View Full Version : U.S.-United Arab Emirates sign nuclear deal

01-16-2009, 06:59 AM
WASHINGTON -- The United States signed an agreement Thursday on civil nuclear cooperation with the United Arab Emirates -- the first such pact with a Middle Eastern country. Calling the agreement "a powerful and timely model for the world and the region," Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice signed the deal, along with UAE Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed.

Congress has to ratify the agreement before it can take effect, and congressional critics fear it could spark an arms race and proliferation in the region. The UAE's ties to Iran also have caused concern. Under the "1-2-3 deal," similar to one the United States signed last year with India, Washington would share nuclear technology, expertise and fuel. In exchange, the UAE commits to abide by the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty and the International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards. The small oil-rich Gulf nation promises not to enrich uranium or to reprocess spent nuclear fuel to extract plutonium, which can be used to make nuclear bombs. The deal is part of a major UAE investment in nuclear energy. It has already signed deals to build several nuclear power plants.

The United States has stressed its role in global nonproliferation initiatives and has donated $10 million to establish an International Atomic Energy Agency international fuel bank. Rep. Howard Berman, a Democrat from California, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, called the safeguards in the agreement "encouraging" but voiced concerns that Iran could take advantage of the agreement.

"This could be a significant advance in nonproliferation policy, and a model for future nuclear cooperation agreements," Berman said in a statement. "However, I and many other members of Congress place a very high priority on the international effort to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability and will be analyzing this and any other nuclear cooperation agreement in the context of how it implicates the attainment of that goal." Iran is the largest trading partner of the United Arab Emirates. In the past, the port city of Dubai, one of the UAE's seven emirates, has been used as a transit point for sensitive technology bound for Iran.

Dubai was also one of the major hubs for the nuclear trafficking network run by Pakistani scientist A.Q. Khan. But U.S. officials said the UAE has taken major steps to improve export controls and prevent money laundering. Still, such ties contributed to stiff opposition in Congress to the failed deal for Dubai Ports World to manage U.S. ports. U.S. officials said Washington is working on similar pacts with Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Jordan

Source: CNN (should be on other better sources too)

01-16-2009, 11:57 AM
The UAE isn't dangerous, per se, but we'd only give Iran fuel for their arguments. They'd instantly whine that the UAE has nuclear technology why can't we. Not just that, but the UAE has human rights violations (low paid / almost slave labor), has shady ties with Iran, and still upholds quite a bit of Islamic law (like the punishment for the sex on the beach couple).

Plus, a nuclear plant in the middle of the Middle East is just perfect for a terrorist attack (and they already have the world's tallest building complete). Given their close ties to the west, their luxury buildings, the Burj Dubai (world's tallest building), and now a nuclear power plant...it's only a matter of time until they're hit with a terrorist attack. I'm thinking 9-11 style plane into Burj Dubai or Mumbai-style attack on their "7-star" world's tallest hotel (right on the water, not terribly far from Iran).