PDA

View Full Version : Here's a Good Analogy to the Stimulus



PoliCon
01-16-2009, 06:43 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GSXbgfKFWg

Ringo
01-16-2009, 06:57 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GSXbgfKFWg

Thats more like the 6 billion Bush added to the national debt.

Why are repubs so worried about 800 billion when Bush just raided the Treasury for 6 trillion ?

More hypocrisy and fake outrage. Overnight the repubs became deficit hawks.

PoliCon
01-16-2009, 07:01 PM
Thats more like the 6 billion Bush added to the national debt.

Why are repubs so worried about 800 billion when Bush just raided the Treasury for 6 trillion ?

More hypocrisy and fake outrage. Overnight the repubs became deficit hawks. Find me one quote from a conservative here DEFENDING these stupid fucking stimulus packages. This is NOT DU were we blindly follow and spew only a party line or worse. :rolleyes:

Ringo
01-16-2009, 07:04 PM
Find me one quote from a conservative here DEFENDING these stupid fucking stimulus packages. This is NOT DU were we blindly follow and spew only a party line or worse. :rolleyes:

Thats the point.

The conservatives were silent while Bush piled up 6 TRILLION in debt.

But now they are outraged at 800 billion to save the nation from the collapse the republicans brought on.

Thats the whole point. Fake outrage.

PoliCon
01-16-2009, 07:05 PM
Thats the point.

The conservatives were silent while Bush piled up 6 TRILLION in debt.

But now they are outraged at 800 billion to save the nation from the collapse the republicans brought on.

Thats the whole point. Fake outrage.You ARE a stupid shit stain aren't you. Conservatives were NOT silent. Our lack of silence is the whole reason why your asshole party has the majorities AND the presidency.

Just because we don't RIOT does not mean we sit by silent.

Ringo
01-16-2009, 07:08 PM
You ARE a stupid shit stain aren't you. Conservatives were NOT silent. Our lack of silence is the whole reason why your asshole party has the majorities AND the presidency.

Just because we don't RIOT does not mean we sit by silent.

Show me where ther republican leaders in the house or Senate spoke out against the spending.

Can you back up your claim like I do ?

PoliCon
01-16-2009, 07:12 PM
Show me where ther republican leaders in the house or Senate spoke out against the spending.

Can you back up your claim like I do ?
FUCKWAD - the SENATE AND THE HOUSE ARE THE ONES DOING THE FUCKING SPENDING!!

Ringo
01-16-2009, 07:14 PM
FUCKWAD - the SENATE AND THE HOUSE ARE THE ONES DOING THE FUCKING SPENDING!!

Ya, Bush had nothing to do with it.

Did he ask if he could spend the hundreds of billions he took from S.S. ?

PoliCon
01-16-2009, 07:21 PM
Ya, Bush had nothing to do with it.

Did he ask if he could spend the hundreds of billions he took from S.S. ?Dumbass - he didn't take anything from social security. LBJ is the one who took money from SS. He's the one who along with congress dissolved the Social Security trust and dumped all the money from the SS trust into the general fund so that it could be spent on social programs. But you'd know that if you knew anything about history - politics - or economics.

Constitutionally Speaking
01-16-2009, 08:37 PM
Thats the point.

The conservatives were silent while Bush piled up 6 TRILLION in debt.

But now they are outraged at 800 billion to save the nation from the collapse the republicans brought on.

Thats the whole point. Fake outrage.



Um NO WE WEREN'T.


Did you happen to see his approval ratings??? That is because we conservatives disliked his spending.

What is REALLY stupid of you is to say Republicans are spendthrifts when in EVERY CASE, Democrats have proposed MORE spending and fought dirty whenever a Republican has proposed cutting spending.

Ringo
01-16-2009, 08:42 PM
Um NO WE WEREN'T.


Did you happen to see his approval ratings??? That is because we conservatives disliked his spending.

What is REALLY stupid of you is to say Republicans are spendthrifts when in EVERY CASE, Democrats have proposed MORE spending and fought dirty whenever a Republican has proposed cutting spending.

His approval was around 30%

Thats the base. They never wavered.

PoliCon
01-17-2009, 12:16 AM
His approval was around 30%

Thats the base. They never wavered.:rolleyes: AND STILL - his approval was always higher than that of Congress - you know - the branch of government that actually does the spending . . . .:rolleyes:

Ree
01-17-2009, 01:00 AM
Thats more like the 6 billion Bush added to the national debt.

Why are repubs so worried about 800 billion when Bush just raided the Treasury for 6 trillion ?

More hypocrisy and fake outrage. Overnight the repubs became deficit hawks.
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i310/ReeW/smilies/Crap3.gif

Constitutionally Speaking
01-17-2009, 09:40 AM
His approval was around 30%

Thats the base. They never wavered.


Sorry, but you are wrong - both in the percentage approval and the base.

Conservatives started leaving about the time he let Kennedy write the Education bill. Pretty much ALL conservatives disagreed with him on the bailouts.

Bush did a few things right, tax cuts, the WOT and SCOTUS appointments. That is about it.

PoliCon
01-17-2009, 10:06 AM
Sorry, but you are wrong - both in the percentage approval and the base.

Conservatives started leaving about the time he let Kennedy write the Education bill. Pretty much ALL conservatives disagreed with him on the bailouts.

Bush did a few things right, tax cuts, the WOT and SCOTUS appointments. That is about it.right. he dropped the ball on immigration - on SS - on cutting spending - on cutting red tape - on energy . . . .

jinxmchue
01-17-2009, 10:12 AM
Thats the point.

The conservatives were silent while Bush piled up 6 TRILLION in debt.

But now they are outraged at 800 billion to save the nation from the collapse the republicans brought on.

Thats the whole point. Fake outrage.

Rush was not silent. Malkin was not silent. A whole slew of other conservative pundits were not silent. Being ignored does not equate to being silent.

jinxmchue
01-17-2009, 10:13 AM
His approval was around 30%

Thats the base. They never wavered.

You're assuming that's the base when you actually have no proof for it. Pull your head out of your ass.

Ringo
01-17-2009, 10:39 AM
You're assuming that's the base when you actually have no proof for it. Pull your head out of your ass.

LOL. If Bush is at 30% ...that would be the base holding on.


Do you think these are Democrats ? ...or maybe moderate repubs ? ...that would be absurd.

Mythic
01-17-2009, 01:22 PM
Do you think these are Democrats ? ...or maybe moderate repubs ? ...that would be absurd.
Really? That would be absurd? Obviously Democrats wont like Bush. But Bush has done a lot of liberal things that many conservatives disagree with. I would think that someone who is less conservative (a moderate) would like that he leaned left at times.