PDA

View Full Version : Expanded Americorps has stench of authoritarianism



Odysseus
03-30-2009, 06:06 PM
San Francisco Examiner Editorial 3/26/09

With almost no public attention, both chambers of Congress in the past week advanced an alarming expansion of the Americorps national service plan, with the number of federally funded community-service jobs increasing from 75,000 to 250,000 at a cost of $5.7 billion. Lurking behind the feel-good rhetoric spouted by the measure’s advocates is a bill that upon closer inspection reveals multiple provisions that together create a strong odor of creepy authoritarianism.
The House passed the measure overwhelmingly, while only 14 senators had the sense and courage to vote against it on a key procedural motion. Every legislator who either voted for this bill or didn’t vote at all has some serious explaining to do.

Last summer, then-candidate Barack Obama threw civil liberties to the wind when he proposed “a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the regular military. The expanded Americorps is not quite so disturbing, but a number of provisions in the bill raise serious concerns.

To begin with, the legislation threatens the voluntary nature of Americorps by calling for consideration of “a workable, fair and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people.” It anticipates the possibility of requiring “all individuals in the United States” to perform such service, including elementary school students.

The bill also summons up unsettling memories of World War II-era paramilitary groups by saying the new program should “combine the best practices of civilian service with the best aspects of military service,” while establishing “campuses” that serve as “operational headquarters,” complete with “superintendents” and “uniforms” for all participants. It allows for the elimination of all age restrictions in order to involve Americans at all stages of life. And, it calls for the creation of “a permanent cadre” in a “National Community Civilian Corps.”

But that’s not all. The bill also calls for “youth engagement zones” in which “service learning” is “a mandatory part of the curriculum in all of the secondary schools served by the local educational agency.”

This updated form of voluntary community service is also to be “integrated into the science, technology, engineering and mathematics curricula” at all levels of schooling. Sounds like a government curriculum for government-approved “service learning,” which is nothing less than indoctrination.

Now, ask yourself if Congress members who voted for this monstrosity had a clue what they were voting for. If not, they’re guilty of dereliction of duty. If they did, the implications are truly frightening.


http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/Expanded-Americorps-has-stench-of-authoritarianism-41869152.html
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Okay, volks! Line up der kinder for the Obama Jugend! As one commenter on the site put it, "Chains we can believe in." Seriously, if this is how the ultra-liberal San Francisco Examiner is reacting to this, it's scarier than I thought.

megimoo
03-30-2009, 06:25 PM
San Francisco Examiner Editorial 3/26/09

With almost no public attention, both chambers of Congress in the past week advanced an alarming expansion of the Americorps national service plan, with the number of federally funded community-service jobs increasing from 75,000 to 250,000 at a cost of $5.7 billion. Lurking behind the feel-good rhetoric spouted by the measure’s advocates is a bill that upon closer inspection reveals multiple provisions that together create a strong odor of creepy authoritarianism.
The House passed the measure overwhelmingly, while only 14 senators had the sense and courage to vote against it on a key procedural motion. Every legislator who either voted for this bill or didn’t vote at all has some serious explaining to do.

Last summer, then-candidate Barack Obama threw civil liberties to the wind when he proposed “a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the regular military. The expanded Americorps is not quite so disturbing, but a number of provisions in the bill raise serious concerns.

To begin with, the legislation threatens the voluntary nature of Americorps by calling for consideration of “a workable, fair and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people.” It anticipates the possibility of requiring “all individuals in the United States” to perform such service, including elementary school students.

The bill also summons up unsettling memories of World War II-era paramilitary groups by saying the new program should “combine the best practices of civilian service with the best aspects of military service,” while establishing “campuses” that serve as “operational headquarters,” complete with “superintendents” and “uniforms” for all participants. It allows for the elimination of all age restrictions in order to involve Americans at all stages of life. And, it calls for the creation of “a permanent cadre” in a “National Community Civilian Corps.”

But that’s not all. The bill also calls for “youth engagement zones” in which “service learning” is “a mandatory part of the curriculum in all of the secondary schools served by the local educational agency.”

This updated form of voluntary community service is also to be “integrated into the science, technology, engineering and mathematics curricula” at all levels of schooling. Sounds like a government curriculum for government-approved “service learning,” which is nothing less than indoctrination.

Now, ask yourself if Congress members who voted for this monstrosity had a clue what they were voting for. If not, they’re guilty of dereliction of duty. If they did, the implications are truly frightening.


http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/Expanded-Americorps-has-stench-of-authoritarianism-41869152.html
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Okay, volks! Line up der kinder for the Obama Jugend! As one commenter on the site put it, "Chains we can believe in." Seriously, if this is how the ultra-liberal San Francisco Examiner is reacting to this, it's scarier than I thought.Follow the next logical steps .Organize into brigades,appoint leaders,issue uniforms .Establish 'boot camps' and start para military training with live ammo .

cowbell
03-31-2009, 06:30 PM
americorps members are just like "professional" volunteers. they barely get paid and they work for non profits all across the country and right now its one of the best options for anyone just getting out of school to find anything even remotely close to a job...why is that so threatening?

Gingersnap
03-31-2009, 06:59 PM
americorps members are just like "professional" volunteers. they barely get paid and they work for non profits all across the country and right now its one of the best options for anyone just getting out of school to find anything even remotely close to a job...why is that so threatening?

A "mandatory" involvement will mean that large numbers of people who don't want to be there will corrupt and undermine the system (see the Vietnam draft). Beyond that, it's wrong to coerce civil engagement on any level. We don't have "mandatory voting" for a reason.

Government-sponsored "charity" undercuts real charity. People who would otherwise give money to charity no longer feel responsible when the government takes those efforts over and forces both tax-payers and "volunteers" to participate. This means that more human-based charities die-off and the government has more scope to do its "one-size-fits-all" routine.

Charity work as a job on a resume is wildly overrated outside of Christian jobs and Ivy League universities. It has no actual impact on your resume for a real, paying job.