PDA

View Full Version : "The American Press Mainstream Treachery."



megimoo
05-24-2009, 10:49 PM
Americans no longer trust the free press to be their eyes and ears

Honest unbiased reporting in the American news room has been so absent for so long that most Americans now seek information elsewhere. Americans no longer trust the free press to be their eyes and ears, to keep them abreast of the facts needed to make intelligent decisions about daily life or politics. Sadly, at this moment in history, even Russia has a more reliable free press than America. If Americans don’t read foreign news sources, they have no clue what is going on in their own country, much less the world.

“The American people continue to remain, for the most part, blissfully unaware of catastrophe looming before them and continue to believe the litany of Orwellian lies being poured upon them by their propaganda media organs, never once raising any objection to trillions of dollars that have been stolen from them and which continues to flow the pockets of their political and corporate overlords intent upon destroying, forever, their once great Nation and which the US Federal Reserve Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman stated brazenly before the US Congress that she has “no idea” where $9 Trillion of US taxpayer has gone, or who got it.” - Bilderberg Group orders destruction of US Dollar?—A pretty important story for U.S. readers I’d say, but it remains unreported by the U.S. press!

As a result of horrific news reporting, talk radio and the Internet have largely replaced the daily newspaper, and that’s why leftists currently running Washington DC are very focused on “bailing out” their friendly propaganda rags, while gaining editorial control over talk radio and the Internet.

Thanks to the Internet, one can access news reports from all over the globe, like this story also unreported by the American press, Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation—which reads like a Hitler social engineering horror story.

From the story, “The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.”

This story is not about the billionaire Bilderberg meeting in Europe, but a similar meeting of anti-American billionaires which took place in America during the same time frame, attended by none other than America’s biggest leftist heroes, Bill Gates, David Rockefeller, Jr., Warren Buffett, George Soros, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, and media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey. The Times UK reported it, but what American press room ran with the frightening headline?

Something VERY evil this way comes, and nobody in the American press wants to investigate or report a single word of it!

Beyond the No. 1-ranked Fox News Channel, few bother watching an overtly leftist mass propaganda system which has become little more than an outlet for leftist talking points. From every alphabet network news desk to every network morning show, and now even the late night comedy hours, TV media is full-tilt off the charts and hard left in their presentation. They have taken a side in the social engineering of America, indeed the world, and everything they produce today is designed to push an anti-American agenda for tomorrow.

Fox is the only news outlet in the entire country that is accused of being a mouthpiece of “the right.” This charge is leveled on the basis that Fox is the only electronic news outlet that even makes an attempt to offer both sides of every story, in a nation where all other electronic media outlets offer only left-wing talking points.

But even Fox News must now be questioned about its integrity as an honest and unbiased outlet for news. The biggest stories in modern political history remains completely unreported in the American mainstream press, including at Fox.


The Ticking Time Bomb
Every American journalist knows the constitutional qualifications for the Oval Office that have existed for more than 200 years. Every journalist knows that Barack Obama has spent nearly $1 million dollars keeping proof that he meets those requirements under lock and key. Every journalist knows that Barack Obama may or may not have been born a natural citizen of the United States, that he certainly was adopted as a citizen of Indonesia in his youth, which at the time did not allow dual citizenship, that he traveled under an Indonesian passport during his college years, and may have even received foreign aid as a foreign student while at Occidental, Columbia or Harvard.

Not one of the mainstream journalists, including at “right-wing” Fox News Network, has taken up an investigative journalist interest to get to the bottom of what is slowly but surely becoming the most explosive story in recent political history.

Alphabet journalists rush to scoop the latest on Lindsay Lohan, American Idol, CIA interrogation procedures, Gore’s Global Warming Swindle, and a laundry list of nonessential tabloid stories. But not one has accepted the challenge of breaking what promises to be a political story that could make Watergate look like a story on the joys of watching paint dry.

This is nothing new… When Bill Clinton accepted $300,000 in illegal Red Chinese campaign money, bagman Johnny Chung became a household name and eventually went to prison for illegal campaign contributions, which coincidentally resulted in the US sharing of nuclear technology and permanent favored nation trade status with Communist China.

But the press never asked the first question about the people who benefited from those illegal campaign contributions, the Clintons. The press was systematically MIA on every story of Clinton corruption, except the sexy stained blue dress story of course, which provided a much-needed distraction from the more important headlines gone missing during the period.


No Place to Run This Time
But the issue of Obama’s constitutional eligibility is such a huge powder keg, the idea of someone tricking congress, the Supreme Court, the news media and the American people into electing someone completely and fundamentally ineligible for office, leaves the press room no place to hide from such an overt act of treachery.

A man whose résumé is limited to a laundry list of ill-advised associations, a missing birth certificate and sealed college records, with no background of leadership anywhere, is the current president of the United States and not one single mainstream journalist has any interest in how this was possible.

However, in the end, there will be no place to run and no place to hide from the truth. Sooner or later, the truth will be known.

A Complicit Press—an uncommon Treachery
Americans have come to expect crime and corruption from their politicians. But they once expected their free press to hold the guilty accountable for their actions.

Today, the press is a complicit party to that crime and corruption. The press is overtly engaged in treachery. They are not ignoring the biggest story in US political history; they are actively working to keep it under cover.

Obama ran a 2-year campaign for leftist power and not one American journalist broke the story about how the man who would become president was in no way qualified for the position.

More than six months after the election, still not one American journalist has investigated the growing charges that Obama fails the constitutional requirements for the Oval Office.

Their answer to public inquiry?—They checked it out at Snopes or FactCheck.org, both of which are propaganda tools owned and operated by the pro-Obama left, for benefit of the anti-American take over of the greatest free nation ever known to mankind, and they are satisfied.

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/11315

AmPat
05-25-2009, 12:00 AM
Obama ran a 2-year campaign for leftist power and not one American journalist broke the story about how the man who would become president was in no way qualified for the position.

More than six months after the election, still not one American journalist has investigated the growing charges that Obama fails the constitutional requirements for the Oval Office.

Their answer to public inquiry?—They checked it out at Snopes or FactCheck.org, both of which are propaganda tools owned and operated by the pro-Obama left, for benefit of the anti-American take over of the greatest free nation ever known to mankind, and they are satisfied.

What is possibly the worst part of this story is that DIMocRATS don't care about the Constitution. The love of power trumps our Constitution as evidenced by the complete silence from their party.

Were this a Republican, we wouldn't need the Press or the other party to demand action. We would clean house. This truly illegally sitting President was never vetted or worse was, and the DIMS completely disregarded the Constitutional requirements for the presidency and further covered up the evidence.

Where is the investigation? Where is the outrage? Don't expect it from the DIMS. They would rather have the issue perpetually unresolved than to uncover the damning truth. They would rather violate our Constitution than lose their precious (power).

Don't expect outrage from the Press. Their favorite Liberal is in power. Outrage from the Press is reserved for Republicans and/or Conservatives. Guilt doesn't matter, only political mileage. Who cares that the Constitution has been violated? Who cares that we have an illegally sitting President? The ends justify the means. DIMocRATS control the government and that is the real story.

Camaraderie
05-25-2009, 06:00 AM
Americans no longer trust the free press to be their eyes and ears

Honest unbiased reporting in the American news room has been so absent for so long that most Americans now seek information elsewhere. Americans no longer trust the free press to be their eyes and ears, to keep them abreast of the facts needed to make intelligent decisions about daily life or politics...

Consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some editors or commentators are slavishly pro-Israel in their every utterance, while others seem nearly neutral. No one, however, dares to take an opposing or controversial view. Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion, from pro-Israel to nearly neutral, is established.

Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the msm -- and no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it.

Even the conservatives who complains about 'managed news' fall into the trap of thinking that because they are presented with a narrow spectrum of opinion they can escape the msm influence by believing the editor or commentator of their choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation.

Another example is the media treatment of hate crime and hate speech in the United States. Some commentators seem dispassionate in reporting news of hate crime and hate speech, while others are emotionally partisan. All of the media spokesmen without exception, however, take the position that "hate crime" laws and "hate speech" codes are here to stay, and that they are a good thing. Rarely is a dissenting viewpoint permitted.

FlaGator
05-25-2009, 09:20 AM
The news media has long ago crossed a line from reporting news to reporting news laced with opinion. The direction that the news media is heading is to have all new stories to be, basically, opinion pieces that reflect the values and political leanings of the owners of the new source in question. Half truths and selective facts are and will be included in new stories to give them the hint of being straight reporting but the bottom line is that people will align themselves with those news organizations who best reflect the beliefs of the news consumers. I don't think that this can be stopped.

What is needed is a truly unbiased news source that simply relates the events and facts of the events that are being reported and leave up to the consumer to fit these things in to their world view. The problem is that most consumers are lazy. It started with the news organizations opting to analyze the news they reported so news consumers got use to that being done for them Then the news organizations took analyzing the news one step further and started telling people how these events effected their lives. Again consumers got use to this. News sources used the argument that they were making the news understandable to consumers when in fact they were deciding for news consumers what was important and what wasn't. When people gave up the right verify that the news was accurate by determining for themselves how it affected them, then they set themselves up to be lied to and to have no way to verify the validity of the news. The current and future states of news reporting are now almost inevitable and it doesn't bode well for a society that wants to be self-determining.

Rockntractor
05-25-2009, 09:36 AM
Consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some editors or commentators are slavishly pro-Israel in their every utterance, while others seem nearly neutral. No one, however, dares to take an opposing or controversial view. Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion, from pro-Israel to nearly neutral, is established.

Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the msm -- and no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it.

Even the conservatives who complains about 'managed news' fall into the trap of thinking that because they are presented with a narrow spectrum of opinion they can escape the msm influence by believing the editor or commentator of their choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation.

Another example is the media treatment of hate crime and hate speech in the United States. Some commentators seem dispassionate in reporting news of hate crime and hate speech, while others are emotionally partisan. All of the media spokesmen without exception, however, take the position that "hate crime" laws and "hate speech" codes are here to stay, and that they are a good thing. Rarely is a dissenting viewpoint permitted.
This quote you took word for word from The fame of a dead man’s deeds…An up close portrait of white nationalist William Pierce by Robert S. Griffin

What kind of comrades do you have?


Consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some editors or commentators are slavishly pro-Israel in their every utterance, while others seem nearly neutral. No one, however, dares to take an opposing or controversial view. Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion, from pro-Israel to nearly neutral, is established.

AHeneen
05-25-2009, 12:29 PM
This is exactly why my homepages are Fox News and BBC News. How 'bout this BBC story:

Scientology on trial in France
The Church of Scientology has gone on trial in the French capital, Paris, accused of organised fraud.
The case centres on a complaint by a woman who says she was pressured into paying large sums of money after being offered a free personality test.
The church, which is fighting the charges, denies that any mental manipulation took place.
France regards Scientology as a sect, not a religion, and the organisation could be banned if it loses the case.
It will be the first time the church has appeared as a defendant in a fraud case in France. Previous court cases have involved individual Scientologists.
Continued... (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8066743.stm)

Camaraderie
05-25-2009, 03:56 PM
This quote you took word for word from The fame of a dead man’s deeds…An up close portrait of white nationalist William Pierce by Robert S. Griffin


Holy mother of God!!!!

Danger Will Robinson!!!!!!!!

-- Robby the Robot

http://uncivilsociety.org/_b9-b.jpg