PDA

View Full Version : Court rules for white firefighters over promotions



Gingersnap
06-29-2009, 10:52 AM
Court rules for white firefighters over promotions

By MARK SHERMAN
The Associated Press
Monday, June 29, 2009 10:44 AM

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court has ruled that white firefighters in New Haven, Conn., were unfairly denied promotions because of their race, reversing a decision that high court nominee Sonia Sotomayor endorsed as an appeals court judge.

New Haven was wrong to scrap a promotion exam because no African-Americans and only two Hispanic firefighters were likely to be made lieutenants or captains based on the results, the court said Monday in a 5-4 decision. The city said that it had acted to avoid a lawsuit from minorities.

The ruling could alter employment practices nationwide, potentially limiting the circumstances in which employers can be held liable for decisions when there is no evidence of intentional discrimination against minorities.

"Fear of litigation alone cannot justify an employer's reliance on race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examinations and qualified for promotions," Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his opinion for the court. He was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.

In dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the white firefighters "understandably attract this court's sympathy. But they had no vested right to promotion. Nor have other persons received promotions in preference to them."

Justices Stephen Breyer, David Souter and John Paul Stevens signed onto Ginsburg's dissent, which she read aloud in court Monday.

Kennedy's opinion made only passing reference to the work of Sotomayor and the other two judges on the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals who upheld a lower court ruling in favor of New Haven.

But the appellate judges have been criticized for producing a cursory opinion that failed to deal with "indisputably complex and far from well-settled" questions, in the words of another appeals court judge, Sotomayor mentor Jose Cabranes.

"This perfunctory disposition rests uneasily with the weighty issues presented by this appeal," Cabranes said, in a dissent from the full 2nd Circuit's decision not to hear the case.

WaPo (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/29/AR2009062901608_pf.html)

Celestron
06-29-2009, 10:58 AM
Proves Obama has nominated a complete idiot as next Supreme Court Justice.

lacarnut
06-29-2009, 11:10 AM
Proves Obama has nominated a complete idiot as next Supreme Court Justice.

At least he is replacing a left wing idiot, Ginsburg, with another one which will not change the make up of the court.

FlaGator
06-29-2009, 11:12 AM
Proves Obama has nominated a complete idiot as next Supreme Court Justice.

Actually it proves nothing, most appeals court judges are overturned by the Supreme Court on a regular basis. All this shows is the disconnect between most appeals court judges and the Supreme Court.

satanica
06-29-2009, 11:21 AM
Proves Obama has nominated a complete idiot as next Supreme Court Justice.

So, when a Supreme Court Justice sits on the court, and casts a vote that goes against the rest of the SC ...it "proves they are a idiot" ?

I am sure every SCJ was in the minority at one time or another.

Rebel Yell
06-29-2009, 11:46 AM
So, when a Supreme Court Justice sits on the court, and casts a vote that goes against the rest of the SC ...it "proves they are a idiot" ?

I am sure every SCJ was in the minority at one time or another.

You're right it doesn't. That's why we have nine justices.

My question is, was the appeals court, and Sotomeyer in particular (because of past remarks), impartial in their decision? If the races were reversed in this case, would they have ruled the same?

Perilloux
06-29-2009, 12:33 PM
High Court Rules for White Firefighters in Discrimination Suit
Ruling Reverses High-Profile Decision by Supreme Court Nominee Sonia Sotomayor


By Robert Barnes
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, June 29, 2009; 12:07 PM

The Supreme Court today narrowly ruled in favor of white firefighters in New Haven, Conn., who said they were denied promotions because of their race, reversing a decision by Judge Sonia Sotomayor and others that had come to play a large role in the consideration of her nomination for the high court.

The city had thrown out the results of a promotion test because no African Americans and only two Hispanics would have qualified for promotions. It said it feared a lawsuit from minorities under federal laws that said such "disparate impacts" on test results could be used to show discrimination.

In effect, the court was deciding when avoiding potential discrimination against one group amounted to actual discrimination against another. The court's conservative majority said in a 5 to 4 vote that is what happened in New Haven. "Fear of litigation alone cannot justify an employer's reliance on race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examinations and qualified for promotions," wrote Justice Anthony M. Kennedy.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the liberals on the court and said the decision knocks the pegs from Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. She read her dissent from the bench for emphasis. "Congress endeavored to promote equal opportunity in fact, and not simply in form," she said. "The damage today's decision does to that objective is untold."

megimoo
06-29-2009, 12:49 PM
High Court Rules for White Firefighters in Discrimination Suit
Ruling Reverses High-Profile Decision by Supreme Court Nominee Sonia Sotomayor


By Robert Barnes
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, June 29, 2009; 12:07 PM

The Supreme Court today narrowly ruled in favor of white firefighters in New Haven, Conn., who said they were denied promotions because of their race, reversing a decision by Judge Sonia Sotomayor and others that had come to play a large role in the consideration of her nomination for the high court.

The city had thrown out the results of a promotion test because no African Americans and only two Hispanics would have qualified for promotions. It said it feared a lawsuit from minorities under federal laws that said such "disparate impacts" on test results could be used to show discrimination.

In effect, the court was deciding when avoiding potential discrimination against one group amounted to actual discrimination against another. The court's conservative majority said in a 5 to 4 vote that is what happened in New Haven. "Fear of litigation alone cannot justify an employer's reliance on race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examinations and qualified for promotions," wrote Justice Anthony M. Kennedy.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the liberals on the court and said the decision knocks the pegs from Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. She read her dissent from the bench for emphasis. "Congress endeavored to promote equal opportunity in fact, and not simply in form," she said. "The damage today's decision does to that objective is untold."
The liberal mind is a thing to behold.Of course the Fact that Ginsburg came from the ACLU has no bearing on the case ?She is one of those who advocate ignoring the American constitution that she took an oath to uphold .Who needs equal of opertunity when we can have Government dictating who gets hired by the local fire department !

AlmostThere
06-29-2009, 01:16 PM
At least he is replacing a left wing idiot, Ginsburg, with another one which will not change the make up of the court.

It seems that virtually every case comes down 5-4. While this woman won't affect the court immediately, she is young and will cement that chair in the liberal's column for the next 25+ years.