PDA

View Full Version : Sarah says Hillary shouldn't whine about media



satanica
07-05-2009, 09:13 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nC-tOzXQOsk

Total Hypocrite.

djones520
07-05-2009, 09:15 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nC-tOzXQOsk

Total Hypocrite.

Says the guy who calls someone a pussy for not responding to his post, then runs away when he's responded to.

Rockntractor
07-05-2009, 09:28 AM
Says the guy who calls someone a pussy for not responding to his post, then runs away when he's responded to.
jappy must be home.

satanica
07-05-2009, 09:34 AM
The fact remains.

She is a hypocrite. She just told us that she quite because the media isn't fair.

djones520
07-05-2009, 09:40 AM
The fact remains.

She is a hypocrite. She just told us that she quite because the media isn't fair.

The fact remains, you're a hypocrite.

lacarnut
07-05-2009, 09:42 AM
We have had a bunch of dumb shits here but you take the prize. The video was in MARCH of 2008. Gov Palin was giving advise to Hillary as a woman and as a politician to disregard the sexist and racial attacks against her and her husband. You would not last 2 seconds as a candidate for dogcatcher cause you are a retard.

satanica
07-05-2009, 09:51 AM
We have had a bunch of dumb shits here but you take the prize. The video was in MARCH of 2008. Gov Palin was giving advise to Hillary as a woman and as a politician to disregard the sexist and racial attacks against her and her husband. You would not last 2 seconds as a candidate for dogcatcher cause you are a retard.


Attacks from who ? Putty in Russia ?

I believe the attacks were coming from the MEDIA.

And ...who is now looking at sueing an Alaskan blogger ...why it's Sarah Palin.

Total hypocrite.

satanica
07-05-2009, 09:52 AM
The fact remains, you're a hypocrite.

How so ?

lacarnut
07-05-2009, 10:01 AM
Attacks from who ? Putty in Russia ?

I believe the attacks were coming from the MEDIA.

And ...who is now looking at sueing an Alaskan blogger ...why it's Sarah Palin.

Total hypocrite.

I can not help it if you are too stupid to view and comprehend her remarks on the video. You are one dumb ass. There is not an "e" in suing.

She has warned this blogger and others that she will sue anyone that LIBELS her or her family. Sounds like to me anyone with a brain would do. That must leave you out then.

djones520
07-05-2009, 10:02 AM
How so ?

You're exhibiting that reading comprehension problem again. Let me illustrate.

Here you are calling Ralph out for not responding to you in what you believe is a timely manner.
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151801&postcount=7
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151809&postcount=10
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151815&postcount=13
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151818&postcount=15
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151845&postcount=21
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151871&postcount=30
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151872&postcount=31

7 Posts where you fellate yourself.

Then he gets back to respond.

http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151919&postcount=43

He clearly answers your question there. But then we have your reading comprehension problem.

http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151946&postcount=48

Apon which, he shows you your error.

http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151950&postcount=50

So as soon as he responds to you, you cut and run. After you make 7 posts calling him a pussy to busy fucking his dog, you flee the moment he returns to answer you.

So yes, the fact remains that YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE.

satanica
07-05-2009, 10:11 AM
You're exhibiting that reading comprehension problem again. Let me illustrate.

Here you are calling Ralph out for not responding to you in what you believe is a timely manner.
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151801&postcount=7
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151809&postcount=10
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151815&postcount=13
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151818&postcount=15
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151845&postcount=21
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151871&postcount=30
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151872&postcount=31

7 Posts where you fellate yourself.

Then he gets back to respond.

http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151919&postcount=43

He clearly answers your question there. But then we have your reading comprehension problem.

http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151946&postcount=48

Apon which, he shows you your error.

http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=151950&postcount=50

So as soon as he responds to you, you cut and run. After you make 7 posts calling him a pussy to busy fucking his dog, you flee the moment he returns to answer you.

So yes, the fact remains that YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE.

Where is the hypocrisy ? ...post a quote buddy.

djones520
07-05-2009, 10:12 AM
Where is the hypocrisy ? ...post a quote buddy.

Click the fuckin links dipshit. Their direct links to every post from the Thunderdome thread made by you and Ralph Wiggum.

satanica
07-05-2009, 10:29 AM
Thats what In thought. All you need to do is post a simple quote that shows my hypocrisy.

You fail again.

djones520
07-05-2009, 10:31 AM
Thats what In thought. All you need to do is post a simple quote that shows my hypocrisy.

You fail again.

I fail because you're to lazy to move your finger less then one milimeter? Ok. :rolleyes:

satanica
07-05-2009, 10:33 AM
I fail because you're to lazy to move your finger less then one milimeter? Ok. :rolleyes:

Dude, you took the time to copy and paste 10 fucking links ...and want me to dig through them looking for what you think is hypocrisy ?

But won't take the effort to post one simple quote that shows my hypocrisy ?

Checkmate ....again.

djones520
07-05-2009, 10:36 AM
Dude, you took the time to copy and paste 10 fucking links ...and want me to dig through them looking for what you think is hypocrisy ?

But won't take the effort to post one simple quote that shows my hypocrisy ?

Checkmate ....again.

The links are direct links to your posts, and Ralphs posts. No one else. Just humor me, and click on one.

Or would you rather I make a single post thats got over a thousand words in it? :rolleyes:

satanica
07-05-2009, 10:45 AM
The links are direct links to your posts, and Ralphs posts. No one else. Just humor me, and click on one.

Or would you rather I make a single post thats got over a thousand words in it? :rolleyes:

Still posting ?

And still failing to post my quote ?

Why keep posting if you unwilling to post my quote ?

djones520
07-05-2009, 10:46 AM
Still posting ?

And still failing to post my quote ?

Why keep posting if you unwilling to post my quote ?

I'm wondering why I'm bothering myself. :rolleyes:

satanica
07-05-2009, 11:18 AM
I'm wondering why I'm bothering myself. :rolleyes:

So...

Sarah said Hillary should suck it up and deal with the media.

Then Palin quits because the media isn't fair.

And you guys don't see any hypocrisy there ?

Lars1701a
07-05-2009, 12:26 PM
Still posting ?

And still failing to post my quote ?

Why keep posting if you unwilling to post my quote ?

JUST ANSWER THE DAMN QUESTION you trolling douche bag.

Zafod
07-05-2009, 05:26 PM
The fact remains.

She is a hypocrite. She just told us that she quite because the media isn't fair.


http://www.ratemyeverything.net/image/5529/0/STFU_and_GTFO.ashx

MrsSmith
07-05-2009, 06:51 PM
So...

Sarah said Hillary should suck it up and deal with the media.

Then Palin quits because the media isn't fair.

And you guys don't see any hypocrisy there ?

You've got to get your facts straight before claiming hypocrisy. :rolleyes:


Every one – all 15 of the ethics complaints have been dismissed (http://www.gov.state.ak.us/exec-column.php). We’ve won! But it hasn't been cheap - the State has wasted THOUSANDS of hours of YOUR time and shelled out some two million of YOUR dollars to respond to “opposition research” – that’s money NOT going to fund teachers or troopers – or safer roads. And this political absurdity, the “politics of personal destruction” … Todd and I are looking at more than half a million dollars in legal bills in order to set the record straight. And what about the people who offer up these silly accusations? It doesn’t cost them a dime so they’re not going to stop draining public resources – spending other peoples’ money in their game.


She quit to save Alaska from spending millions more proving that she's done nothing wrong. You'd think the liberals would have more sense than to waste so much money when the country is in a recession. :mad:

hazlnut
07-05-2009, 06:57 PM
You've got to get your facts straight before claiming hypocrisy. :rolleyes:




She quit to save Alaska from spending millions more proving that she's done nothing wrong. You'd think the liberals would have more sense than to waste so much money when the country is in a recession. :mad:

You mean, she died for our sins??

St. Sarah.:rolleyes:

Shannon
07-05-2009, 06:59 PM
You'd think the liberals would have more sense than to waste so much money when the country is in a recession. :mad:

I wouldn't think they ever have sense much less when it comes to spending money.

hazlnut
07-05-2009, 07:05 PM
I wouldn't think they ever have sense much less when it comes to spending money.

By 'they' I hope you mean politicians in general.

Shannon
07-05-2009, 07:17 PM
By 'they' I hope you mean politicians in general.

I was referring to liberals in this particular instance.

MrsSmith
07-05-2009, 07:33 PM
You mean, she died for our sins??

St. Sarah.:rolleyes::rolleyes: Does your foot taste good?

I mean, as I said, that Sarah is tired of Alaska spending millions of dollars on bogus complaints that will find no ethical violations. She can't do the job when her staff is constantly busy searching for proof that she is innocent.

The burden of proof AND the cost should be on the shoulders of those filing the bogus claims, but it isn't. Of course, like all "good" libs, those that hate Sarah are doing it on the taxpayer dollar.

If the political parties were reversed, the media wouldn't be reporting the claims in the ethical complaints, they'd be reporting the amount of money wasted for no reason.

They would also be screaming "innocent until proven guilty," a phrase that seems to apply only to Dims.

hazlnut
07-05-2009, 07:38 PM
I was referring to liberals in this particular instance.

Because conservative politicians have such a great track record in recent years???:rolleyes:

Shannon
07-05-2009, 07:43 PM
Because conservative politicians have such a great track record in recent years???:rolleyes:

Don't roll your eyes at me. I'm not stupid. You asked a question. I even added "in this particular instance" so you would know better than to say what you just said. And yet you did anyhow.

MrsSmith
07-05-2009, 07:44 PM
By 'they' I hope you mean politicians in general.

You do realize that the liberals blowing the taxpayer money filing bogus complaints are mostly not politicians.

hazlnut
07-05-2009, 07:52 PM
:rolleyes: Does your foot taste good?

I mean, as I said, that Sarah is tired of Alaska spending millions of dollars on bogus complaints that will find no ethical violations. She can't do the job when her staff is constantly busy searching for proof that she is innocent.

I thought she paid for those out of her own pocket?




The burden of proof AND the cost should be on the shoulders of those filing the bogus claims, but it isn't. Of course, like all "good" libs, those that hate Sarah are doing it on the taxpayer dollar.

If the political parties were reversed, the media wouldn't be reporting the claims in the ethical complaints, they'd be reporting the amount of money wasted for no reason.

They would also be screaming "innocent until proven guilty," a phrase that seems to apply only to Dims.

Sorry, not buying it. In fact, I agree with George Will on Palin's 'reasons' (if you can call them that):


"The one that rings most hollow is, she doesn't want to put Alaska through the terror of [her] being a lame-duck governor," Will said. "If she is just weary of it, one can understand that. Still, she made a contract with [voters] to serve out her term. And she said, in her own words, she now is a quitter."

Frankly, MrsSmith, if you got all that from Palin's somewhat rambling and incoherent statement on Friday, then you are smarter than most conservative politicians and pundits including Karl Rove--because they don't have a clue as to what she's up to:

Conservatives taken aback by Palin's decision to resign (http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/05/palin.reaction/)


By contrast, those on the political right acknowledged that they didn't know what to make of it.

Karl Rove, the "architect" of George W. Bush's successful presidential campaigns, said the resignation left many of Palin's fellow Republicans "a little perplexed."

"It's a risky strategy," Rove told "Fox News Sunday."

"Astounding," was the pronouncement by Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, and conservative columnist George Will said Palin was declaring herself a quitter.

Also, you don't appear to fully comprehend the expression to put one's foot in one's mouth.:o;)

MrsSmith
07-05-2009, 08:02 PM
I thought she paid for those out of her own pocket?

She is paying half a million in legal fees. The remaining millions are staff salaries and government expenses required to handle the government side of every bogus complaint.






Sorry, not buying it. In fact, I agree with George Will on Palin's 'reasons' (if you can call them that):



Frankly, MrsSmith, if you got all that from Palin's somewhat rambling and incoherent statement on Friday, then you are smarter than most conservative politicians and pundits including Karl Rove--because they don't have a clue as to what she's up to:

Conservatives taken aback by Palin's decision to resign (http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/05/palin.reaction/)


Word for word. Perhaps you need to brush up your reading and comprehension skills.



Also, you don't appear to fully comprehend the expression to put one's foot in one's mouth.:o;)

It means that you've either said something really stupid, which you did, or you've said something to embarrass another person, which you also did. In fact, most of your posts are embarassing.

hazlnut
07-05-2009, 08:33 PM
It means that you've either said something really stupid, which you did, or you've said something to embarrass another person, which you also did. In fact, most of your posts are embarassing.

Likewise, I find many of your posts idiotic and thin on logic and reason.

I don't agree with your take on Palin's recent statement--why is that embarrassing? Do you see yourself as some brilliant political thinker we should all bow down to?

How you even formed your take on her speech is almost as mysterious as the speech itself. Perhaps you're better at translating Sarah-speak than the rest of us. You're so big on facts--would you mind posting a few??-- Because conservative politicos are not hearing what you're hearing.

Maybe Karl Rove and George Will are not privy to the same 'facts' that you are. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

IMO--she owes the State of Alaska to serve out her term.

BTW - Calling someone's point of view 'stupid' is not much of a counter-argument.

I don't know you personally, I'm sure you're nice person. We may even get on swimmingly under other circumstances.;)

Zafod
07-05-2009, 11:25 PM
I am a dickhead Dave....










....

hazlnut
07-05-2009, 11:59 PM
On to deep throat hags










.....

Zafod
07-06-2009, 01:23 AM
.....

yeah that was clever......:rolleyes:

hazlnut
07-06-2009, 09:36 AM
yeah that was clever......:rolleyes:

Actually, I thought you had come up with some sort of anagram based on my signature quote... then I realized you weren't that smart.:p;)

BTW--are you mr. smith? Then why do you care. Or why didn't you respond intelligently to my post responding to her??

Zafod
07-06-2009, 09:10 PM
Actually, I thought you had come up with some sort of anagram based on my signature quote... then I realized you weren't that smart.:p;)

BTW--are you mr. smith? Then why do you care. Or why didn't you respond intelligently to my post responding to her??

what ever HAL