PDA

View Full Version : Medical Care Confusion



patriot45
07-21-2009, 10:21 AM
This post is mainly for satty! Dr. Sowell (http://townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2009/07/21/medical_care_confusion?page=full&comments=true) explains it so even an idiot of sattys stature will understand.



Is there a coherent argument for government-controlled medical care or are slogans and hysteria considered sufficient?

We hear endlessly about how many Americans don't have health insurance. But, if we stop and think-- which politicians hope we never do-- that raises the question as to why that calls for government-controlled medical care.

A bigger question is whether medical care will be better or worse after the government takes it over. There are many available facts relevant to those crucial questions but remarkably little interest in those facts.



There are facts about the massive government-run medical programs already in existence in the United States-- Medicare, Medicaid and veterans' hospitals-- as well as government-run medical systems in other countries.

None of the people who are trying to rush government-run medical care through Congress before we have time to think about it are pointing to Medicare, Medicaid or veterans' hospitals as shining examples of how wonderful we can expect government medical care to be when it becomes "universal."

As for those uninsured Americans we keep hearing about, there is remarkably little interest in why they don't have insurance. It cannot be poverty, for the poor can automatically get Medicaid.

In fact, we already know that there are people with substantial incomes who choose to spend those incomes on other things, especially if they are young and in good health. If necessary, they can always go to a hospital emergency room and receive treatment there, whether or not they have insurance.

Here, the advocates of government-run medical care say that we all end up paying, one way or another, for the free medical care that hospitals are forced by law to provide in their emergency rooms. But unless you think that any situation you don't like is a reason to give politicians a blank check for "change," the relevant question becomes whether the alternative is either less expensive or of better quality. Nothing is cheaper just because part of the price is paid in higher taxes.

Such questions seldom get asked, much less answered. We are like someone being rushed by a used car dealer to sign on the dotted line. But getting stuck with a car that is a lemon is nothing compared to signing away your right to decide what medical care you or your loved ones will get in life and death situations.

Keep reading satty (http://townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2009/07/21/medical_care_confusion?page=2)

satanica
07-21-2009, 10:23 AM
In your last thead on Heathcare you said the healthcare would be 100% free to everyone in the US.

LOL. I see the crazy train is still rolling down the tracks.

marv
07-21-2009, 01:19 PM
Everbody should talk to THIS GUY (http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Alcoholic-22-Dies-After-Being-Refused-Life-Saving-Liver-Transplant/Article/200907315342299?lpos=UK_News_Carousel_Region_0&lid=ARTICLE_15342299_Alcoholic%2C_22%2C_Dies_After _Being_Refused_Life-Saving_Liver_Transplant) first before making up their mind on government run health care...:D

lacarnut
07-21-2009, 01:36 PM
In your last thead on Heathcare you said the healthcare would be 100% free to everyone in the US.

LOL. I see the crazy train is still rolling down the tracks.

Yeah, for a freeloading lazy bum like you.