At what point does a liberal become a Stalinist?

[megimoo]

The first adjective that comes to mind for "liberal" may be "touchy-feely." The best adjective for a Stalinist might be "murderous." That's a pretty big difference.
.................................
As Alinsky wrote this in his Rules for Radicals:
"What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be.

The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals s written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away."
..............................................

I would never want to mistake a well-meaning liberal for a nasty Stalinist. At the same time, I hope we don't fail to spot any Stalinists who might be looking for mischief and pretending to be liberals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koestler

Certainly the mainstream media aren't interested in the difference.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Book_of_Communism


http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/at_what_point_does_a_liberal_become_a_stalinist.ht ml

[PALEOCON]

obviously when they (which includes those who call themselves 'conservatives' for the most part) start down the Bush/Obama road.

[Sonnabend]

obviously when they (which includes those who call themselves 'conservatives' for the most part) start down the Bush/Obama road.

Of the two, Obama is head and shoulders the epitome of a socialist, a stalinist and a fascist.

Scratch a lefty...find a dictator....always prepared to stamp on any dissent.

Every single time.