View Full Version : Blacks in N.C. Town Canít Get Elected Without Democratic Party Label

10-21-2009, 09:49 AM
Justice Department Says Blacks in N.C. Town Can’t Get Elected Without Democratic Party Label

The U.S. Department of Justice is refusing to allow the town of Kinston, N.C., to hold nonpartisan local elections on the grounds that African Americans cannot win election without being listed as Democrats on the ballot.

In a letter sent Saturday by to Kinston City Attorney James P. Cauley III, the Justice Department stated: “Removing the partisan cue in municipal elections will, in all likelihood, eliminate the single factor that allows black candidates to be elected to office.”

The department Tuesday also refused to answer questions from CNSNews.com about the letter.

Kinston voters last year approved changing city council elections to a nonpartisan basis, similar to thousands of other towns in the U.S. – without mention of party affiliation.

The letter, written by Acting Assistant Attorney General Loretta King, flatly asserts that the decision was made on the assumption that the town’s citizens use race as the primary consideration in voting.

“In Kinston elections,” King wrote, “voters base their choice more on the race of a candidate rather than his or her political affiliation, and without either the appeal to party loyalty or the ability to vote a straight ticket, the limited remaining support from white voters for a black Democratic candidate will diminish even more.”

The Justice Department analysis was based partly on the opinions of local officials in Kinston, the letter said.

“Numerous elected municipal and county officials confirm the results of our statistical analysis,” she wrote, “that a majority of white Democrats support white Republicans over black Democrats in Kinston city elections. At the same time, they also acknowledged that a small group of white Democrats maintain strong party allegiance and vote along party lines, regardless of the race of the candidate.”

However, King asserted that even whites who currently vote for black candidates would abandon them in nonpartisan elections.

“Many of these white crossover voters are simply using straight-ticket voting. As a result, while the racial identity of the candidate greatly diminishes the supportive effect of the partisan cue, it does not totally eliminate it. It follows, therefore, that the elimination of party affiliation on the ballot will likely reduce the ability of blacks to elect candidates of choice,” King concluded.

The letter incensed one congressman, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), who condemned it as “unconstitutional” and “racist.”

“This policy of the Department of Justice that prohibits them from removing the partisan label on a local candidate’s name is done for reasons purely of race and the policy is, on it’s face, racist,” Rep. King – no relation to the asst. attorney general – claimed.

“It’s outrageously offensive,” said the congressman, “and it should be offensive to, especially, African Americans to be pandered to in that way, and to have the Department of Justice tell them that they don’t have the ability to discern who to vote for by name, that they can only discern that if it’s party – and it presumes that all African Americans are Democrats.”

Also, here is a video of a woman who voted for BO yet has realized he is a real fraud and has a message for ObamaZombies:
(Language warning)


10-21-2009, 10:26 AM
I'm not surprised.
But don't dare expose it or you are a racist. :rolleyes:

10-21-2009, 10:53 AM
It's the same in Detroit. Any challenge to Conyers or Kwame's mommy has to come from within the democratic party-neither district has enough GOP voters to overcome the Detroit numbers. Conyers has some of the downriver suburbs in his district, and Kwame's mommy has Harper Woods and the Grosse Points.

Keith Butler served on the city council in the early 90s as a republican. His church/cult was still located in Detroit at that time, now it's in Southfield. I would have voted for a GOP mayoral primary candidate in the 2001 primaries if I had still lived in the city at the time-I think his name is Bill Brooks, and he is a former GM executive. He was the only one who was honest about the amount of poverty in Detroit-you can't help fix what you pretend isn't there.

10-21-2009, 11:41 AM
I've read about this story in 3 different articles and still don't understand why this judge ruled this way.

The town is 2/3 black. If blacks only vote for blacks (as implied) then the fact that a few whites won't vote for a nonpartisan black is irrelevant.

What am I missing here? :confused:

10-21-2009, 12:13 PM
I've read about this story in 3 different articles and still don't understand why this judge ruled this way.

The town is 2/3 black. If blacks only vote for blacks (as implied) then the fact that a few whites won't vote for a nonpartisan black is irrelevant.

What am I missing here? :confused:It's the principle of the thing !Blacks always belong to the Democrats dontchaknow ?

10-21-2009, 12:42 PM
This is what this tells me:

"Black voters, we think you're too stupid to be able to vote in an open election and we fear that you might vote for the wrong person so we're going to make sure you know which candidate you're supposed to vote for."

If I were black and lived in this town I'd be livid and insulted.

10-21-2009, 01:21 PM
All the evidence I have seen supports the assumption that Blacks vote along racial and party lines. This means that all reason, intellect, and common sense is a non-issue with Blacks. One deserves what one supports.;)