View Full Version : Among Other Problems, Obama's Safe School Czar has Ties to "NAMBLA"

12-05-2009, 04:52 PM
Reason to be grateful Obama appointed gay porn-purveyor Jennings as Safe Schools Czar

No, my post title does not mean I’ve gone off my rocker and started supporting Kevin Jennings in his role as Safe Schools Czar. Thanks to Terresa Monroe’s hard work, I’ve known for months exactly what kind of person Kevin Jennings, the “Safe School Czar” is.

He’s a career gay man who is devoted to ensuring that children as young as five or six are exposed to a steady stream of sexual information that may help them get in contact with their homosexual side.

Nor is this merely an academic interest. As Zombie documented, Jennings has very close ties to NAMBLA, an organization that actively works to legalize pedophilia (see here, here and here for the results of Zombie’s working tying Jennings to NAMBLA and its leaders).

The latest hit against Jennings is a report at Gateway Pundit. This report details the way in which Jennings’ gay/education/political activism group, GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network), actively pushes schools to include in their reading lists extremely sexually explicit books aimed at kids in the 7th through 12th grades.

And when I say sexually explicit, I’m not talking about coy allusions to hand-holding, kissing and warm fuzzy feelings.
It is graphic. No child — gay, straight, confused, whatever — should be reading this kind of material. The listed books include pornographic pictures, descriptions of sado-masochistic acts, graphic descriptions of sexual acts, etc.
Nor is Jennings’ relationship to this group tenuous: as Gateway Pundit says:

GLSEN started essentially as Jennings’ personal project and grew to become the culmination of his life’s work. And he was chosen by President Obama to be the nation’s Safe Schools Czar primarily because he had founded and led GLSEN (scroll for bio).

Given what a foul swamp Jennings crawled out of to join the Obama administration, why in the world am I saying that I’m grateful to Obama for his appointment? Easy. Before Jennings hit the big time, we — meaning parents and concerned citizens — didn’t have any idea what was going on.

We thought that the politically correct aspects of the gay rights movement, insofar as they intersected with education, simply meant assuring that gay kids don’t get abused or bullied at school.

That’s a goal that I think all civilized people believe to be good. Sure, there were the books about gay penguins and two mommies, and we weren’t thrilled about them, but even those were painted in warm, fuzzy pastels, aimed at assuring us that it was all about making sure that gay children weren’t ostracized and abused in the “lord of the flies” atmosphere that prevails in so many schools.

Jennings’ appointment, however, has exposed us to the fact that there is a loud, active subset of gay activists who are not concerned simply with ensuring that young boys and girls are safe, but that instead genuinely wants to expose all children to explicit gay sexual activity.

Certainly that’s what the GLSEN reading list indicates to be the case. The existence of this material leads to the next question, which is why these activists want children to be primed as fully sexualized gay actors?

Well, Jennings’ involvement with NAMBLA, and NAMBLA activists leads to the logical answer: pedophiles are using our school system to groom children as their sexual partners.

Without Obama’s idiotic decision to appoint a grooming pedophile as his Safe Schools Czar, all of this stuff would have continued to work under the radar.

It takes the type of prominence Obama gave Jennings to expose the rot in our educational system. And that’s why we should be very grateful to Obama for appointing Jennings as the czar. Had he not done so, it’s entirely reasonable to believe that no one — and certainly not a critical mass of parents and observers — would have cared about or noticed what was going on.

To take myself as an example, I know that I don’t have the time to vet every single book on my children’s reading lists. There are dozens, even hundreds, of them. I can only hope that the common sense and morality I’ve already inculcated into my children helps armor them against these intellectual and psychic insults.

In a bizarre way, Obama is working out well as a president.

Yes, he’s the first leader in the history of the world intentionally to denigrate and degrade his own nation’s standing.

Yes, he may be the scourge of the military and national security.
And yes, he may be trying to bankrupt our economy.

But he’s also doing something incredibly important: he’s ripping the smiley-faced mask the left has worn since the Civil Rights movement.

In the 40 odd years since the Left coopted the Civil Rights movement, it has managed to convince Americans that conservatives are evil, narrow-minded, racist, sexist, homophobic crucifix-clutching, oppressors, intent on reinstating a repressive, sharia-like world.

Leftists have simultaneously presented themselves as the good guys, concerned only for the well-being of every oppressed person in the world.

What we’re seeing, though, now that the mask is going, going, gone, is the fact that some people deserve to be oppressed:

pedophiles; radical Islamists who hate women, gays, Jews and Christians;

grievance mongers who want to keep blacks permanently latched to the government teat;

socialists who would rather see everyone suffer under a bad medical system, than allow anyone to benefit under a good one.

And the lists goes on. Without any restraints, Obama’s hubris, and the hubris of those who surround him, has exposed the noxious cancer lying at the heart of Leftism:

it advances totalitarian deviance at the expense of the decent, free norm.

(Usual disclaimer here: I am not homophobic. I am opposed, however, to a gay political agenda,

exemplified by Kevin Jennings’ career, that seeks to sexualize our youth, and to make private bedroom behavior an overarching social and political concern that strikes at the central pillars of a stable culture.)


12-05-2009, 05:30 PM
Broad brush coming.

DIMocRATS are for deviant, anti-american, in-your-face radicalism. They are for changing forever the best of our culture for a continuous yet sickening gay rights-gay pride parades. Franky and Johnny swapping spit in public, Fanny and Franny will be diddling each other openly. We "responsible" adults will have to explain the spectacle to our children while the Leftists beam at their handiwork.:mad:

12-05-2009, 06:12 PM
I frankly thought that Obama would be smarter than to blatantly appoint such outrageous and unqualified czars. It's easy to see why he's going the czar route; his appointees would never make it by vetting and confirmation by any sane group of politicians. Wait, the Dims probably would be cheering them on. :rolleyes:

12-05-2009, 07:04 PM
Safe Schools Czar. Putting a pedophile in as the highest authority regarding our kid's education. Yeah, that is safe.

12-05-2009, 09:30 PM
Safe Schools Czar. Putting a pedophile in as the highest authority regarding our kid's education. Yeah, that is safe.

More of that superior judgement that O Blah Blah has demonstrated so often.:rolleyes:

12-05-2009, 10:15 PM
Can we please learn the definition of pedophilia and start using it properly? Someone might want to look up the term Hebephilia and find out what it means.

12-07-2009, 01:22 PM
Okay, there is nothing in that article or any of the links that proves that Jennings himself is a member of NAMBLA nor that he is a pedophile (or a hebophile). It proves he said something nice a few times about a man who is/was a member of NAMBLA. I'm not defending NAMBLA, but Jennings made a comment about one man (Harry Hay), who was one of the early leaders for gay rights, and also a member of NAMBLA.

That doesn't make Jennings a member of NAMBLA. It doesn't make him a pedophile. His failure to condemn Harry Hay at the demands of an on-line columnist does not make him into a pedophile.

GLSEN's agenda is a separate matter. Arguments can be made for or against it without preying on people's worse fears by using conjecture and supposition to connect a man with something he's not connected with in any way beyond a comment he made about someone who was.

12-07-2009, 01:57 PM
What is so wrong about being affiliated with the National Association of Marlon Brando Look Alikes? Have we fallen this low as a people? Remember it is Christmas time.

12-07-2009, 06:36 PM
Where have you all been. This was old news this summer.