View Full Version : "Wiki Is a liar:Climategate at Wikipedia."

12-27-2009, 07:13 PM
Lawrence Solomon: Climategate at Wikipedia (Wiki is a liar)

Since my Saturday column described how Wikipedia editors have been feverishly rewriting climate history over much of the decade, fair-minded Wikipedians have been doing their best to correct the record.

No sooner than they remove gross distortions, however, than the distortions are replaced. William Connolley, a Climategate member and Wikipedia’s chief climate change propagandist, remains as active as ever. How does Wikipedia work and how does Connolley and his co-conspirators exercise control?

How does Wikipedia work and how does Connolley and his co-conspirators exercise control? Take Wikipedia’s page for Medieval Warm Period, as an example. In the three days following my column’s appearance, this page alone was changed some 50 times in battles between Connolley’s crew and those who want a fair presentation of history.
With the hockey stick graphs so thoroughly discredited, you’d think they would become a footnote to a discussion of the Medieval Warm Period, or an object of amusement and curiosity. But no, on the Wikipedia page for the Medieval Warm Period, the hockey stick graph appears prominently at the top, as if it is settled science.
Because the hockey stick graph has become an icon of deceit and in no way an authority worthy of being cited, fair-minded Wikipedians tried to remove the graph from the page, as can be seen here. Exactly two minutes later, one of Connelley’s associates replaced the graph, restoring the page to Connelley’s original version, as seen here.

Battles like this occurred on numerous fronts, until just after midnight on Dec 22, when Connolley reimposed his version of events and, for good measure, froze the page to prevent others from making changes -- and to prevent the public, even in two-minute windows, from realizing that today’s temperatures look modest in comparison to those in the past. In the World of Wikipedia, seen as here, the hockey stick graph, and Connolley’s version of history, still rules.


12-27-2009, 07:27 PM
How can this be? Wiki is Wilbur's bible.:confused:

12-28-2009, 03:05 PM
How can this be? Wiki is Wilbur's bible.:confused:

Wilbur, is your answer right there :eek::p

12-29-2009, 02:59 AM
What makes anyone think those skeptic editors are in the right, claiming that temperature reconstructions are "a deception"? Why are they automatically trustworthy?

12-29-2009, 03:03 AM
Wilbur, you may be (well let's face it, you are) a total knob-end on the AGW issue, but I'm glad you're back on CU.