PDA

View Full Version : Martha Coakley Is Going Down!



megimoo
01-17-2010, 07:18 PM
Martha Coakley Is Going Down!

Go Scott Brown!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BDoh_NkqvQ
....................
It's Time We Take Back The People's Seat! (Boston Video)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnbrbZrqeT4

Nubs
01-18-2010, 08:09 AM
Here is the problem:

Brown's win will only give enough votes to stop the Dems plans but not enough votes to pass anything. So the Dems will spend the next 2 years proposing the same marxist crap, the repubs will stop it, things will get worse, through no fault of the repubs. The Dems will then blame it on the "party of no."

Space Gravy
01-18-2010, 10:02 AM
Here is the problem:

Brown's win will only give enough votes to stop the Dems plans but not enough votes to pass anything. So the Dems will spend the next 2 years proposing the same marxist crap, the repubs will stop it, things will get worse, through no fault of the repubs. The Dems will then blame it on the "party of no."

I think that scenario is still better than their plan actually happening.

lacarnut
01-18-2010, 11:56 AM
Here is the problem:

Brown's win will only give enough votes to stop the Dems plans but not enough votes to pass anything. So the Dems will spend the next 2 years proposing the same marxist crap, the repubs will stop it, things will get worse, through no fault of the repubs. The Dems will then blame it on the "party of no."

The Tea Party folks are the party of no not the Repubs. They have brought their opposition to the forefront. Had it not been for them, in all probably a couple of RINO's would have voted for the health care bill. No health care, no cap and trade, no immigration bill, no new taxes, etc. etc. is a good thing. No bill is better than a bad bill.

If the Repubs take over the House, which I think they will in 2010, the Democrats will only have till the end of this year to pass socialistic legislation rather than 2 years. Anything that gets passed while the Democraps have a majority in both houses and the Presidency will be almost impossible to overturn. So I am not worried about who, what or where blame is placed.

AlmostThere
01-18-2010, 01:22 PM
This is a tough call, a really tough call. Patrick Kennedy was campaigning for Coakley. Kennedy repeatedly referred to her as Marcia, but her name is Martha. Secondly, he tells Massachusetts citizens they have to vote for MARCIA Coakley to solve the problems Bush caused.

Now here is my dilemma. I can't decide which of these two scenarios best describes Kennedy as the frikking idiot he is or the frikking idiots he thinks the citizens of Massachusetts are. This is a tough one but don't worry, I will figure it out. :rolleyes:

megimoo
01-18-2010, 01:47 PM
This is a tough call, a really tough call. Patrick Kennedy was campaigning for Coakley. Kennedy repeatedly referred to her as Marcia, but her name is Martha. Secondly, he tells Massachusetts citizens they have to vote for MARCIA Coakley to solve the problems Bush caused.

Now here is my dilemma. I can't decide which of these two scenarios best describes Kennedy as the frikking idiot he is or the frikking idiots he thinks the citizens of Massachusetts are. This is a tough one but don't worry, I will figure it out. :rolleyes:Kennedy is a 'light weight' political idiot who only holds his seat in the Congress because of his late fathers influence.He is totally unqualified for the job but then again that goes for most of those critters.
Hopefully he is the last of that bunch of 'hangmen' !

coach
01-18-2010, 02:23 PM
Here is the problem:

Brown's win will only give enough votes to stop the Dems plans but not enough votes to pass anything. So the Dems will spend the next 2 years proposing the same marxist crap, the repubs will stop it, things will get worse, through no fault of the repubs. The Dems will then blame it on the "party of no."


the American people are the ones saying no. the donkeys are refusing to listen.

linda22003
01-18-2010, 03:55 PM
This is a tough call, a really tough call. Patrick Kennedy was campaigning for Coakley. Kennedy repeatedly referred to her as Marcia, but her name is Martha. Secondly, he tells Massachusetts citizens they have to vote for MARCIA Coakley to solve the problems Bush caused.

Now here is my dilemma. I can't decide which of these two scenarios best describes Kennedy as the frikking idiot he is or the frikking idiots he thinks the citizens of Massachusetts are. This is a tough one but don't worry, I will figure it out. :rolleyes:

That makes him an idiot? Hmmmm, that's what lacarnut was calling her too, on the other thread, Marcia..... :p Are you saying he's an idiot too?
"The Democrats are in deep shit even if Marcia wins."
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showthread.php?p=228238#post228238

obx
01-18-2010, 03:58 PM
That the Kennedys are idiots goes without saying.
________
HY-DRIVE (http://www.dodge-wiki.com/wiki/Hy-Drive)

AmPat
01-18-2010, 04:01 PM
That makes him an idiot? Hmmmm, that's what lacarnut was calling her too, on the other thread, Marcia..... :p Are you saying he's an idiot too?
"The Democrats are in deep shit even if Marcia wins."
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showthread.php?p=228238#post228238

No Linda, he is an idiot because of his Libertardism. He cannot help what idiotic nonsense comes out of his mouth. :cool:

lacarnut
01-18-2010, 04:07 PM
That makes him an idiot? Hmmmm, that's what lacarnut was calling her too, on the other thread, Marcia..... :p Are you saying he's an idiot too?
"The Democrats are in deep shit even if Marcia wins."
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showthread.php?p=228238#post228238

I am mocking Kennedy. Got it. However, it is nice of you to take up for another boozer like Patrick. Kinda runs in the family. Plus, anyone that over indulges in booze or drugs does idiotic things. Don't you think?

linda22003
01-18-2010, 04:11 PM
I didn't "take up" for anyone. Patrick Kennedy is of no interest to me whatever. I naturally assumed you got it wrong. :p

lacarnut
01-18-2010, 04:38 PM
I didn't "take up" for anyone. Patrick Kennedy is of no interest to me whatever. I naturally assumed you got it wrong. :p

Well, I naturally assumed you were taking up for Kennedy since you are so connected with the DC scene. However, I and others were spot on about Patrick's idiocy with his booze and drug problems. You can chalk that one up.