PDA

View Full Version : Cornyn has 29 co-sponsors to his Military Voting Protection Act, all of them Republic



megimoo
08-02-2008, 02:36 PM
Senate Bill Aimed at Making Absentee Ballots from Overseas Count

WASHINGTON Although roughly 6 million U.S. citizens are eligible to vote oversees using absentee ballots many of whom are serving in the military only a fraction of their ballots are being counted.

The bipartisan Election Assistance Commission found that of the nearly 1 million absentee ballots sent out for the 2006 election, only 300,000 actually were counted. Some estimate the low return of absentee ballots meant 400,000 service members' votes overseas weren't counted.

The problem seems to be the mail. It takes 18 days for the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail to Iraq and 18 days for it to be returned.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, has introduced legislation that would allow absentee ballots to be sent via Federal Express to those serving in the military, although there reportedly is resistance from the postal union.

"It should be a national scandal that, here, our men and women in uniform who are protecting our freedom who are exposing themselves to harm are being denied the most basic civil right, and that is the right to vote," Cornyn said.

Cornyn has 29 co-sponsors to his Military Voting Protection Act, all of them Republican.

"I think its really a lack of focus and attention by the federal government," Cornyn said. "And, I think, the Department of Defense bares a special responsibility and my legislation's designed to see them discharge it to make sure that those votes count. ...

"This is something that if most Americans knew existed, the current dismal state of actual opportunity to see your vote count for our men and women in uniform, they would be up in arms."

But Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he didn't realize there was a problem.

"I think we have a significant responsibility to encourage our men and women in uniform to vote and to enable them to vote. And so this is a high priority, and your question prompts me to go find out if things are on track ... as I have been told they are in terms of making sure that we have the ballots and things available for our for our troops,"

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,396343,00.html

Zathras
08-03-2008, 02:22 AM
Gee, what a surprise that no Dems support this. After all, it's letting votes from people that, in large numbers, vote for the opposition party. :rolleyes:

NonConformist
08-03-2008, 08:24 AM
Gee, what a surprise that no Dems support this. After all, it's letting votes from people that, in large numbers, vote for the opposition party. :rolleyes:

Well thats just not fair! That means we could lose

Odysseus
08-03-2008, 12:24 PM
Gee, what a surprise that no Dems support this. After all, it's letting votes from people that, in large numbers, vote for the opposition party. :rolleyes:

So much for letting every vote count. This is no surprise. Remember when they sent lawyers to FL with a memo that detailed how to get military ballots disqualified? They know who their constituencies are, and who they aren't. McCain should use this issue to slam Obama.

BTW, the Army has a secure system, Army Knowledge Online, that requires CAC Card access for certain functions (password reset, for example), as does the Navy and Air Force (I believe that the Marines are on the Navy system). There's no reason why they can't set up an AKO site to send out ballots with a digital signature, except for the law, which usually requires a manual signature (it varies from state to state). A federal mandate that, in the case of overseas military personnel, a digital signature would be the legal equivalent of a manual one (which it already is on military documents, in fact, it's the preferred method for anything that requires multiple signatures, like an OER) would pave the way for AKO voting. Democrats claim that they are in favor of internet voting, this is a workable system that would require very little in the way of modification, and it's a lot more secure than the ID requirements in a lot of states. I can't wait for them to explain why they're against it.

megimoo
08-03-2008, 12:43 PM
Gee, what a surprise that no Dems support this. After all, it's letting votes from people that, in large numbers, vote for the opposition party. :rolleyes:They know that no self respecting American Troop would vote for a slimy traitorous Liberal Democrat Rat !