PDA

View Full Version : dems Threatened



namvet
03-24-2010, 05:03 PM
well guess if you piss off the entire country you should expect it. no doubt the libs will blame it on right wing radicals belonging to the Tea party.


More than 10 lawmakers have complained they've received threats since the run-up to Sunday's House vote on a health insurance overhaul, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said Wednesday, and law enforcement officials are taking the allegations seriously.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/24/fbi-investigates-possible-threats-directed-house-democrats/

FlaGator
03-24-2010, 05:07 PM
I am in no way advocating the people should threaten our elected officials but they really should have known that there would be a reaction like this. I'm sure that they looked at the polls and knew that a majority of the people weren't behind this. Piss of enough people at once and your bound to get the attention of some of the loose canons.

Apocalypse
03-24-2010, 06:05 PM
Here's some thing to think about.

What if the GOP killed the bill?

Do any of you think that the left would have been saying or doing any of this?

And what do you think the reaction of the Media, and the majority of the left leadership would be?

namvet
03-24-2010, 06:27 PM
Here's some thing to think about.

What if the GOP killed the bill?

Do any of you think that the left would have been saying or doing any of this?

And what do you think the reaction of the Media, and the majority of the left leadership would be?

damned tea party. their all killers

Freeman_Shadwell
03-24-2010, 08:31 PM
I'm having a difficult time mustering any sympathy for those being threatened.

Nubs
03-24-2010, 08:31 PM
This is how they will marginalize conservatives. Agitate to the point of reaction then feign indignance.

It's like a game of hockey. One player agitates the opposing player with borderline and some illegal actions when the refs aren't looking. Once the agrieved player is fed up and retaliates, the ref is looking. The instigator acts like "WTF was that???" (i.e. Sydney Crosby) and the agrieved player is in the box for 2 minutes.

We need to hit back hard but legally.

patriot45
03-24-2010, 08:38 PM
This is how they will marginalize conservatives. Agitate to the point of reaction then feign indignance.

It's like a game of hockey. One player agitates the opposing player with borderline and some illegal actions when the refs aren't looking. Once the agrieved player is fed up and retaliates, the ref is looking. The instigator acts like "WTF was that???" (i.e. Sydney Crosby) and the agrieved player is in the box for 2 minutes.

We need to hit back hard but legally.

Ha, can't you wait till the Nov. elections when the smarmy libtards will be telling people that the big bad Reps want to take your God given health care rights away!! They have no shame!

sgrooms
03-24-2010, 09:41 PM
Our guns are next.

You hide and watch.

THE RESISTANCE
03-25-2010, 03:35 PM
After a hundred plus years of bombings, beatings, and riots, cars burning in the streets... the destruction...the destruction...the destruction!!!! by the liberal-socialist in this nation..but wait the right starts reading, using, and applying things of the liberal-socialist playbook and now they become all whiney???

Whaaa! Whaaaa!! Whaaaaa!!!

noonwitch
03-25-2010, 03:38 PM
This is how they will marginalize conservatives. Agitate to the point of reaction then feign indignance.

It's like a game of hockey. One player agitates the opposing player with borderline and some illegal actions when the refs aren't looking. Once the agrieved player is fed up and retaliates, the ref is looking. The instigator acts like "WTF was that???" (i.e. Sydney Crosby) and the agrieved player is in the box for 2 minutes.

We need to hit back hard but legally.



Sydney had a really bad night on Monday at the Joe:D.

Megaguns91
03-25-2010, 03:39 PM
Our guns are next.

You hide and watch.

They day someone comes for my guns is the day I become not so cute anymore. :p

Rockntractor
03-25-2010, 03:55 PM
After a hundred plus years of bombings, beatings, and riots, cars burning in the streets... the destruction...the destruction...the destruction!!!! by the liberal-socialist in this nation..but wait the right starts reading, using, and applying things of the liberal-socialist playbook and now they become all whiney???

Whaaa! Whaaaa!! Whaaaaa!!!
I haven't seen us apply anything from the liberal-socialist playbook.:confused:

THE RESISTANCE
03-25-2010, 05:57 PM
I am posting of the tactics they employ should we copy it is their way.

If I was some of these "loyal' liberal-socialist democrats I would keep an eye on my back.

Brutus might be lurking to take one out. So blame can be placed on those "terrible" tea party members.

It is also the way of the socialist-communist-fascist.

Articulate_Ape
03-25-2010, 06:52 PM
This is how they will marginalize conservatives. Agitate to the point of reaction then feign indignance.


Exactly. It is their chosen tactic to try to change the discussion and is straight out of Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals (http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm). The right must be careful not to give them the opportunity to do this, by staying on message and focusing on the ballot box for paying back these SOBs.

Big Guy
03-25-2010, 07:58 PM
Here's some thing to think about.

What if the GOP killed the bill?

Do any of you think that the left would have been saying or doing any of this?

And what do you think the reaction of the Media, and the majority of the left leadership would be?

I couldn't see the photo, but I imagine;

Riots is the streets of Detroit, Atlanta, Los Angeles, New York City, Baltimore, Memphis and many more.

noonwitch
03-26-2010, 07:39 AM
I couldn't see the photo, but I imagine;

Riots is the streets of Detroit, Atlanta, Los Angeles, New York City, Baltimore, Memphis and many more.


I doubt it, at least as far as Detroit goes. There hasn't been a non-sports related riot here since the one in 1967. I thought there was going to be one after the Malice Green trial, but there wasn't.

NJCardFan
03-26-2010, 10:01 AM
And to think some don't think there is a bias in the media. How many of you have heard this story? I know I didn't:GOP lawmaker now reports threat over healthcare stance (http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/89065-gop-lawmaker-now-reports-threat-over-healthcare-stance)

Or This:Cantor Says Campaign Office Was Shot At, Accuses Dems of Exploiting Threats (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/25/rep-cantors-richmond-campaign-office-shot-overnight/)

Where's the outrage over these attacks?

nightflight
03-26-2010, 12:10 PM
And to think some don't think there is a bias in the media. How many of you have heard this story? I know I didn't:GOP lawmaker now reports threat over healthcare stance (http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/89065-gop-lawmaker-now-reports-threat-over-healthcare-stance)

Or This:Cantor Says Campaign Office Was Shot At, Accuses Dems of Exploiting Threats (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/25/rep-cantors-richmond-campaign-office-shot-overnight/)

Where's the outrage over these attacks?

But its okay if they do it.

AmPat
03-26-2010, 12:19 PM
"DIMS threatened?" Did somebody start the rumor that they will have to go to work?:eek: Did a manly conservative glare at one of the effeminate little sissies?:rolleyes: Threatened my butt.:cool:

Lanie
03-26-2010, 06:36 PM
I agree that the congressmen and congresswomen should have expected some threats to some.

It still doesn't make things right and that actually hurts the cause of those against the bill. You think we didn't feel threatened during the Bush years? We did. Threats wouldn't have been justified though and they're not justified now.

namvet
03-26-2010, 06:46 PM
I agree that the congressmen and congresswomen should have expected some threats to some.

It still doesn't make things right and that actually hurts the cause of those against the bill. You think we didn't feel threatened during the Bush years? We did. Threats wouldn't have been justified though and they're not justified now.

for every action there's a reaction

Lanie
03-26-2010, 09:53 PM
for every action there's a reaction

I agree. Just remember that threats are actions.

Rockntractor
03-26-2010, 09:55 PM
I agree. Just remember that threats are actions.
I'm afraid not toots!

AmPat
03-27-2010, 09:32 AM
I agree that the congressmen and congresswomen should have expected some threats to some.

It still doesn't make things right and that actually hurts the cause of those against the bill. You think we didn't feel threatened during the Bush years? We did. Threats wouldn't have been justified though and they're not justified now.

Threatened over what? Were liberals that scared of having the gov't titty forcibly pulled out of your widdle entitled mouths?:rolleyes:

NJCardFan
03-27-2010, 10:49 AM
Let's be real here. There are kooks on both sides. The difference is that conservatives understand that when a leftist kook says or goes something, it's just that singular individual leftist kook. When to liberals, when a right wing kook does or says something, it's representative of the entire group. This is because conservatives accept people as individuals and liberals do by what group they are in. Except when it comes to Islamic terrorism.

Hansel
03-27-2010, 11:00 AM
Let's be real here. There are kooks on both sides. The difference is that conservatives understand that when a leftist kook says or goes something, it's just that singular individual leftist kook. When to liberals, when a right wing kook does or says something, it's representative of the entire group. This is because conservatives accept people as individuals and liberals do by what group they are in. Except when it comes to Islamic terrorism.

Liberals are big fans of collectivism so no wonder the acts of one are construed to be the acts of all.

NJCardFan
03-27-2010, 11:18 AM
Liberals are big fans of collectivism so no wonder the acts of one are construed to be the acts of all.

Except when it comes to Islamic terrorism. Then it's just a few kooks to them and not a majority of the group.

Speedy
03-27-2010, 11:28 AM
It finally dawned on them that to campaign, they actually have to face their constituents. The constituents they held in open and obvious contempt.

Wei Wu Wei
03-27-2010, 12:36 PM
And to think some don't think there is a bias in the media. How many of you have heard this story? I know I didn't:GOP lawmaker now reports threat over healthcare stance (http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/89065-gop-lawmaker-now-reports-threat-over-healthcare-stance)

Or This:Cantor Says Campaign Office Was Shot At, Accuses Dems of Exploiting Threats (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/25/rep-cantors-richmond-campaign-office-shot-overnight/)

Where's the outrage over these attacks?

i heard these several times on Fox News and CNN and they already discovered that the Cantor bullet was just a random stray that someone shot in the air, it wasn't intentional.

Hansel
03-27-2010, 12:47 PM
It finally dawned on them that to campaign, they actually have to face their constituents. The constituents they held in open and obvious contempt.
I think the rabid dogs that vote Democratic are eating it up and are waiting for the next biggee to greae their palms.

Chuck58
03-27-2010, 01:03 PM
Regarding the shot at Cantor's office, I heard the explanation. A random bullet 'grazed' his campaign office window? GRAZED the window?

As for the others, people emailed, called, sent letters, protested in the streets, confronted the drones face to face, and were ignored even when the dirtbags knew the majority of their constituents opposed obamacare. Now, we're supposed to keep calling, keep emailing, etc, etc because violence is not a part of American politics.

Since when? Since those in power did it in the 1960s and '70s? Now, it's bad form, huh?

Those People pushed and pushed. Now, they've got a people who are pushed against the wall, and November is still a long way off. The people are angry, frustrated and I don't think they're going to be pushed any more.

Wei Wu Wei
03-27-2010, 02:01 PM
from Fox News

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/26/bullet-struck-cantors-office-appears-randomly-fired/


Later Thursday, however, Richmond police said in a news release that the bullet had been fired into the air around 1 a.m. Tuesday. It finished its arc back to earth at a sharp downward trajectory, breaking a window pane on the bottom floor of the two-story brick building where Cantor's campaign leases the top floor.

The spent bullet hit the floor about one foot inside the shattered pane. No one was in the building at the time. A police investigation has yielded no suspects.

AmPat
03-27-2010, 02:55 PM
i heard these several times on Fox News and CNN and they already discovered that the Cantor bullet was just a random stray that someone shot in the air, it wasn't intentional.

I'll remember that comment when a "random" bullet strays into a liberal pols window. Then I'll see how your sentiments shift.:rolleyes:

How about those "random" made up comments of racist nature? Still no evidence. I'm waiting,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.:rolleyes: