PDA

View Full Version : Woody Allen: “It Would Be Good If Obama Could Be a Dictator for a Few Years”



Trance
05-17-2010, 10:52 AM
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com...r-a-few-years/


Woody Allen wants Barack Obama to be dictator for for a few years so that he can completely socialize America. The article published today, May 15, 2010, did not make it into any English-language paper.
The article quotes Allen as saying [first in Spanish, then in English from a trusted reader] –

“Estoy encantado con Obama, creo que es genial. El Partido Republicano debería quitarse de su camino y dejar de intentar herirle.”

Translated to:

“I am pleased with Obama. I think he’s brilliant. The Republican Party should get out of his way and stop trying to hurt him.”

And, the money quote:

“…sería bueno…si pudiera ser un dictador durante algunos años, porque podría hacer un montón de cosas buenas rápidamente.”

The translated quote:

“…it would be good…if he could be a dictator for a few years because he could do a lot of good things quickly.”

Of course, this comes as a complete shock.
What is it with these leftist loons and their passion for socialist dictators

FlaGator
05-17-2010, 10:55 AM
The problem is that Woody in no longer sane.

Trance
05-17-2010, 11:13 AM
The problem is that Woody in no longer sane.

Was he ever?

Gingersnap
05-17-2010, 11:15 AM
Freaking unbelievable. Woody and all his Manhattan buddies would be on the short-list for wealth confiscation and "re-education" under a dictatorship.

I've never yet heard of a dictatorship that didn't crack down, and crack down hard, on the pastimes of the intelligentsia: drugs, sex, free speech, and artistic license.

PoliCon
05-17-2010, 11:53 AM
Freaking unbelievable. Woody and all his Manhattan buddies would be on the short-list for wealth confiscation and "re-education" under a dictatorship.

I've never yet heard of a dictatorship that didn't crack down, and crack down hard, on the pastimes of the intelligentsia: drugs, sex, free speech, and artistic license.

Which goes to show exactly how out of touch the leftist elites really are.

Dan D. Doty
05-18-2010, 03:37 AM
The problem is Woody Allen has never been in touch with America.

He, and his trust fund friends have always believed that the USA stops at the Hudson, and those living between the river and Hollywood are bunch of inbreed, unschooled, back woods barbarians who need the Woody Allens of the world to run their lives for them.

They see the fly-over country as the forbidden zone from THE PLANET OF THE APES, and those living there as the underground mutants.

In other words, a bunch of stuck up rich jerkazoids from Manhatten don't listen to anyone outside of New York, New York, nor do they like anyone outside that city ( refeer back to the barbarian passage).

Woody's happy bunch see themselves as the new nobles, and we, as the stupids serfs that need to put back in our place.

And P.S, , all of Woody's movies after SLEEPER sucked ass.

Thank you.

Apocalypse
05-18-2010, 10:22 AM
We are talking about a guy, that is loved by the French, is better known for being a pervert, and hasn't had a real film in years that people have wanted to go see. He's become a joke.

Odysseus
05-18-2010, 10:40 AM
Wait a minute, I thought Obama was our dictator for a few years. He certainly seems to think that he is.

marinejcksn
05-18-2010, 11:59 AM
Woody Allen says President Obama should be granted dictatorial powers

In an interview published by Spanish language newspaper La Vanguardia (that we translated), Allen says “I am pleased with Obama. I think he’s brilliant. The Republican Party should get out of his way and stop trying to hurt him.”

The director said "it would be good…if he could be a dictator for a few years because he could do a lot of good things quickly."

http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2010/05/director_woody_allen_says_it_w.html

marinejcksn
05-18-2010, 12:01 PM
Another nut joins the ranks of Sean Penn, Tim Robbins and Danny Glover. :rolleyes:

Rational people are really interested in what this neurotic pedophile thinks. Your movies suck ass too, Woody. Douche.

noonwitch
05-18-2010, 12:06 PM
I never thought Woody Allen was funny. One of my friends who is 12 years older than me loves his movies, especially Manhattan and the one with Diane Keaton. I always figured it was a generational thing, that the boomers love him or something.

Then the whole thing came out about his relationship with his stepdaughter, and I realized I didn't like his movies because he is a jerk.

lacarnut
05-18-2010, 12:42 PM
Put him in a cell with his buddy R.P.

PoliCon
05-18-2010, 10:39 PM
Isn't Woody the perve who was screwing his underaged addopted daughter? :rolleyes: Need anything more be said?

NJCardFan
05-19-2010, 12:35 AM
Isn't Woody the perve who was screwing his underaged addopted daughter? :rolleyes: Need anything more be said?

He married her. That's even worse. But it's funny how another millionaire wants socialism in America. Tell you what, you all line up first and give up your wealth and then we'll talk. If not, shut the fuck up and go back to your Smirnoff Ice and caviar and leave the country to the grown ups.

obx
05-19-2010, 08:47 AM
Put him in a cell with his buddy R.P.

Woody just came out with a statement in favor of R.P. Can Charley Manson be far behind? Woody should stick to giving Tiger Woods tips for a happy marriage.
________
SILVER SURFER REVIEWS (http://vaporizers.net/silver-surfer-vaporizer)

PoliCon
05-19-2010, 09:07 AM
He married her. That's even worse. But it's funny how another millionaire wants socialism in America. Tell you what, you all line up first and give up your wealth and then we'll talk. If not, shut the fuck up and go back to your Smirnoff Ice and caviar and leave the country to the grown ups.

True. Exceedingly generous with other peoples money our democrat friends are . . . .

Trance
05-19-2010, 10:55 AM
True. Exceedingly generous with other peoples money our democrat friends are . . . .

That's Liberalism in a nut-shell. They want us to give up our wealth while they live high on the hog.

PoliCon
05-19-2010, 11:03 AM
That's Liberalism in a nut-shell. They want us to give up our wealth while they live high on the hog.

Liberalism? No. Leftism? yes. reality is - there are no liberals on the left. They are progressives who have misappropriated the term liberal and we need to stop using that term to describe them.

MountainMan
05-23-2010, 03:43 PM
Freaking unbelievable. Woody and all his Manhattan buddies would be on the short-list for wealth confiscation and "re-education" under a dictatorship.

I've never yet heard of a dictatorship that didn't crack down, and crack down hard, on the pastimes of the intelligentsia: drugs, sex, free speech, and artistic license.

Not sure any sane person could keep a straight face while discussing Woody Allen and using the phrase "artistic license".....just saying.

Elspeth
05-23-2010, 08:23 PM
Woody Allen says President Obama should be granted dictatorial powers

In an interview published by Spanish language newspaper La Vanguardia (that we translated), Allen says “I am pleased with Obama. I think he’s brilliant. The Republican Party should get out of his way and stop trying to hurt him.”

The director said "it would be good…if he could be a dictator for a few years because he could do a lot of good things quickly."

http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2010/05/director_woody_allen_says_it_w.html

Has he forgotten Hitler?:confused:

Odysseus
05-24-2010, 09:42 AM
Has he forgotten Hitler?:confused:

Of course not. Woody's seen Raiders of the Lost Ark, so he knows that the Nazis were bad guys. :D

Liberals know that Hitler was bad, but they believe that he was bad because they've been told it repeatedly by the media and what little education they have had about the Nazis and totalitarian movements, but most liberals can't really explain much more about Nazism than that they were racist murderers. They think that there are "good" dictators (on the left) and "bad" dicators (on the right, or what they have been told is the right, since many of their bete noirs were actually leftists, such as Mussolini, Peron and good old Adolph). As a result of these ideological blinkers, they think that they "know" that Franco was bad, as were Mussolini, Pinochet, Somoza and Battista, but they don't understand that Lenin, Mao, Castro, Allende, Ortega, Chavez and Che were far more vicious and destructive, and when one of their icons does become discredited as a monster, such as Stalin or Pol Pot, they simply ignore their leftist credentials or excuse them as having "deviated" from the path of "true socialism." If, instead of trying to keep score between the left and the right, they examined the differences between liberty and the various strains of tyrrany in the world, they'd see that some of their chosen villains actually advanced freedom (Pinochet, for example), while most of their heroes were simply thugs with good press.