PDA

View Full Version : Cancelled: There Will Be No Congressional Budget This Year



PoliCon
06-22-2010, 12:31 PM
gopleader.gov

Boehner
Contact:


Cancelled: There Will Be No Congressional Budget This Year
***The Following Is An Important Fiscal Health Announcement***


Washington, Jun 22 -

In light of House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer’s (D-MD) announcement this morning that House Democrats will not pass a budget this year – failing to fulfill what he has called “the most basic responsibility” of governing – the following important fiscal health warning has been issued:

THE BUDGET HAS BEEN



CANCELLED



WE REGRET TO INFORM YOU THAT



THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET



PLANNED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 HAS BEEN CANCELLED DUE TO WASHINGTON DEMOCRATS’ OUT-OF-CONTROL SPENDING SPREE.



AN APOLOGY FOR THIS BETRAYAL OF AMERICAN TAXPAYERS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE FORTHCOMING AT THIS TIME.



BE ADVISED THAT THE FOLLOWING SERVICES WILL BE INTERRUPTED:



Imposing the fiscal discipline economists say is needed to create jobs and boost our economy



Reining in the out-of-control spending spree that is killing American jobs



Carrying out the “most basic responsibility of governing”

Stopping middle-class tax hikes that will sock family budgets at the worst possible time

Providing the leadership on jobs and the economy that Americans say is sorely lacking

Protecting our kids and grandkids from the enormous debt burden Washington has placed on them


We reserve the right to notify you of additional consequences that may arise in light of this budget failure, which is unprecedented in the modern era. In the interim, please brace for more spending, more debt, more tax hikes, more broken promises.



For families and small businesses looking for a government that listens to the people it serves and respects their hard-earned money, House Republicans are offering better solutions to cut spending now and help small businesses put people back to work.

http://gopleader.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=191653

PoliCon
06-22-2010, 01:19 PM
If You Can't Budget, You Can't Govern
A Commentary By Debra J. Saunders
Tuesday, June 22, 2010

"If you can't budget, you can't govern," Rep. John Spratt Jr., D-S.C., proclaimed in 2006 when the House GOP leadership chose to dispense with passing a budget resolution.

Now that the Dems run the House, Spratt is chairman of its Budget Committee and the April 15 deadline for passing a budget resolution is a niggling detail, easily ignored. House Democrats have decided to not even try to pass a budget resolution before this fiscal year expires on Sept. 30 -- and may well delay passage until after the November elections.

As the congressional newspaper The Hill reported Monday, Spratt announced that in lieu of a 2011 budget resolution, the House is likely to pass a "functional equivalent" measure that leaves out inconvenient budget numbers -- most notably an annual operating deficit averaging around $1 trillion over the next five to 10 years.

In April, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had assured reporters that her House would pass a real budget resolution. But the far left wants to spend more, while the center left wants modest cuts in spending -- or at least not to be tied to the far left's bills that further increase the national debt.

When in doubt, the default position in Washington -- for either party -- has been to spend more of other people's money.

The Budget Impoundment and Control Act of 1974 created the April 15 deadline, although it has not been unusual for Capitol Hill to pass said legislation late. Four times since, Congress baldly failed to approve budget resolutions -- all four times, the GOP controlled the House.

Now the Democrats are about to join the rule-flouting club, but with their own unique contribution. Under Pelosi, the House didn't even propose a budget resolution. House Democrats aren't even faking at faking it.

President Obama has said that he wants to reduce discretionary spending. Toward that end, the president named a deficit commission. Earlier this month, White House Budget Director Peter Orszag asked federal agencies not involved in national security to list savings in their shops that could cut spending by 5 percent next year.

But this year, Democrats won't pass a budget resolution -- which means there will be no limit on spending in next year's 12 spending authorization bills. Democratic proposals to cut budgets by 2 percent won't see a floor vote.

As the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget noted last month, "The very reasonable push to reduce some discretionary spending has left the House unable to agree on a plan." In short, D.C. lawmakers cannot curb the growth in government spending to save their own necks.

As the Weekly Standard's Stephen F. Hayes wrote, "(T)hey're deliberately refusing to offer a budget until after the November elections. They're simply choosing to ignore the law."

The House Democrats must figure that they have a better chance of hanging onto their offices by doing nothing -- and they may be right. As Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., told the Los Angeles Times, "Name one person who won or lost an election because they didn't get a budget resolution passed."

Come November, with any luck, voters will be able to name more than one.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/political_commentary/commentary_by_debra_j_saunders/if_you_can_t_budget_you_can_t_govern

Rebel Yell
06-22-2010, 01:34 PM
Now that the Dems run the House, Spratt is chairman of its Budget Committee and the April 15 deadline for passing a budget resolution is a niggling detail

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e217/felixdragonhart/Animated/thats_racist.gif

fettpett
06-22-2010, 02:44 PM
surprise, nothing like double talk hypocracy

Right-Wing Conspirator
06-22-2010, 03:15 PM
Do these blind, stupid sonsofbitches not understand that people have reached their limit with this type of behavior? Do they REALLY think this will help them?

What kid of bizzaro world do they live in?

PoliCon
06-22-2010, 03:19 PM
Do these blind, stupid sonsofbitches not understand that people have reached their limit with this type of behavior? Do they REALLY think this will help them?

What kid of bizzaro world do they live in?

with no budget and no MSM coverage of it - a large percentage of Americans will remain ignorant.

warpig
06-22-2010, 08:09 PM
Don't play with my emotions................

Odysseus
06-23-2010, 11:04 AM
with no budget and no MSM coverage of it - a large percentage of Americans will remain ignorant.

That's the amazing thing to me, that the media hasn't covered this at all. This is a massive news story and the media is ignoring it. The difference between the NY Times and Pravda under Stalin is that the editors of Pravda knew that Stalin would kill them and their families if they didn't toe the line. The Times has no excuse.

PoliCon
06-23-2010, 12:13 PM
That's the amazing thing to me, that the media hasn't covered this at all. This is a massive news story and the media is ignoring it. The difference between the NY Times and Pravda under Stalin is that the editors of Pravda knew that Stalin would kill them and their families if they didn't toe the line. The Times has no excuse.

Sure they do. They're 1000% in bed with the agenda of the current administration. You know as well as I do - with progressives the ends justify the means. They don't care how it happens as long as they get their way. So there is no way that they are going to willingly cover a story that does not fit their narrative.

Apocalypse
06-23-2010, 12:47 PM
As I pointed out in another thread. They won't be dont a budget this year instead they will do this.


House Dems prepare alternative to budget that would avoid deficit vote

By Walter Alarkon – 06/20/10

House Democrats are readying an alternative budget measure that would set next year’s spending levels without requiring a vote on deficits.

House Budget Committee Chairman John Spratt (D-S.C.) said the alternative would be the “functional equivalent” of a full-fledged budget. But because it won’t be a traditional budget resolution, it will be silent on future deficits, which are expected to average nearly $1 trillion for the next decade.

Democrats have expressed concern about voting for a document showing lots of red ink in an election year.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/10...d-deficit-vote

PoliCon
06-23-2010, 02:47 PM
As I pointed out in another thread. They won't be dont a budget this year instead they will do this.

exactly.

Odysseus
06-23-2010, 07:03 PM
Sure they do. They're 1000% in bed with the agenda of the current administration. You know as well as I do - with progressives the ends justify the means. They don't care how it happens as long as they get their way. So there is no way that they are going to willingly cover a story that does not fit their narrative.

That's their reason for doing it, not their excuse.


Democrats have expressed concern about voting for a document showing lots of red ink in an election year.
Which should make them think about not doing it, rather than simply rewriting the budget process. I wonder if this is even legal. Not that it matters. It's just more of the Chicago way.