PDA

View Full Version : What Do Dems Have Against Women?



warpig
10-11-2010, 11:58 PM
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-10-08/jerry-brown-and-the-women-hating-liberal-women/?cid=hp:beastoriginalsL2


What about saying that she’s a whore?”

No, I wasn’t eavesdropping on a Duke fraternity meeting. This was the suggestion of an aide to Democrat Jerry Brown on how to deal with his GOP rival for the California governorship, Meg Whitman.

Once a tape of the conversation was leaked, the Brown campaign apologized.

While we, sadly, are all too familiar with the casual misogynistic comment, what perhaps is more surprising is where these slurs lately have been coming from—progressive bastions like the Brown camp, and liberal women.

Last month, liberal talk show host Stephanie Miller laughed uproariously when a female guest on her show said that if she ever met Michelle Malkin, “I would kick [her] right in the nuts,” and warned, “Wear a cup, lady.”

Charming.

Or how about this: “You have to lift their skirts to find out if they are women. You sure can’t find out by how they vote.” This is what Democratic Rep. Janis Baird Sontany of Nashville said earlier this year of her female GOP colleagues.

Or this: “Sarah Palin may be a lady, but she ain't no woman,” as Cinta Wilson wrote during the tsunami of anti-Palin hysteria in 2008. In her Salon piece, Wilson went on to refer to the Alaska governor as a “Christian Stepford wife in a ‘sexy librarian’ costume” and the GOP’s “hardcore pornographic centerfold spread.”

Who needs misogynist men when liberal women will do the job for you, often sounding that shopworn theme that women GOP candidates are somehow inauthentic women?

Palin, of course, has been the target of many such smears. She was derided as, “Bush in a skirt” on Huffington Post, and at The Washington Post, Wendy Doniger blogged of then-VP candidate Palin: “Her greatest hypocrisy is in her pretense that she is a woman.”

Not that liberal men are much better.

Ann Coulter is often referred to as “Mann-coulter” on political blogs in an effort to de-feminize her. And MSNBC’s Keith Olberman once referred to Malkin as a “mashed-up bag of meat with lipstick.”

Gingersnap
10-12-2010, 09:51 AM
Charming. I'm not surprised. More than once, I've heard true blue liberals who champion equality and diversity say the most vile things about women who disagree with them politically. It's as if they more angered when a woman follows her own mind than when a man does. It's the worst kind of sexism because it doesn't just objectify women - it actually dehumanizes them. :(

FlaGator
10-12-2010, 10:12 AM
Charming. I'm not surprised. More than once, I've heard true blue liberals who champion equality and diversity say the most vile things about women who disagree with them politically. It's as if they more angered when a woman follows her own mind than when a man does. It's the worst kind of sexism because it doesn't just objectify women - it actually dehumanizes them. :(

Liberals do this to all those who disagree with them. Minorities who vote conservative are "Uncle Toms" or what every the ethnic equivilent is and women have their femininity questioned. It is amusing that it is the feminists themself who are most vicious in their attacts on women who are politically successful, if those women are conservatives. Those under attack exemplify everything the feminist movement likes to hold up as positive female role models except for their political allegiences. For this they are trashed and objectified in much the same manner as the porn industry objectifies women. There is no universal sisterhood once politics becomes involved.

NJCardFan
10-12-2010, 11:16 AM
It's like when Carrie Prejean made her comment and was roasted over a spit, women's groups actually agreed with her being roasted over a spit. This is because like race, women's movements are more about ideology than equality.

warpig
10-12-2010, 06:45 PM
I even remember the liberals trashing Lewinsky and the other chicks that Clinton fooled around with. They went after their looks in a big way to a point one of them wouldn't do interviews or something.

xavierob82
10-18-2010, 06:39 PM
Michelle Bachman, Sarah Palin, and Christine ODonnel are nutters.

What do Repubs have against sanity?

Rockntractor
10-18-2010, 06:41 PM
Michelle Bachman, Sarah Palin, and Christine ODonnel are nutters.

What do Repubs have against sanity?

http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showthread.php?p=325420#post325420

FlaGator
10-18-2010, 06:44 PM
Michelle Bachman, Sarah Palin, and Christine ODonnel are nutters.

What do Repubs have against sanity?

I don't know, but seeing that you and sanity have parted company... perhaps you could babble out a semi coherent answer?

Calypso Jones
10-18-2010, 07:03 PM
liberal men don't have anything against women. They love them for sex or for getting whatever it is that the liberal guy needs...money, power and of course the first...sex. They realize how useful women are. They don't think they are for any thing other than the liberal guy's satisfaction of his desire. You want your women to think like you do...sex on demand, anytime, anywhere. You want your woman to bring home the bacon so to speak. You want her parroting the way YOU want her to think and live so that it is to your advantage. You want her to be Jezebel to your King Ahab.

now a palin or o'donnell or angle...those women are too independent. Libs don't like that.

warpig
10-18-2010, 09:04 PM
liberal men don't have anything against women. They love them for sex or for getting whatever it is that the liberal guy needs...money, power and of course the first...sex. They realize how useful women are. They don't think they are for any thing other than the liberal guy's satisfaction of his desire. You want your women to think like you do...sex on demand, anytime, anywhere. You want your woman to bring home the bacon so to speak. You want her parroting the way YOU want her to think and live so that it is to your advantage. You want her to be Jezebel to your King Ahab.

now a palin or o'donnell or angle...those women are too independent. Libs don't like that.

I'll take a small different view. That liberal women are revered for taking the "women are masters of their own body/sexuality" stance. I will agree on the liberal man needs, but I believe it cuts both ways with both genders, and those who do not parrot the liberal mantra for women are the ones outcast and set upon.

Calypso Jones
10-18-2010, 11:09 PM
I'll take a small different view. That liberal women are revered for taking the "women are masters of their own body/sexuality" stance. I will agree on the liberal man needs, but I believe it cuts both ways with both genders, and those who do not parrot the liberal mantra for women are the ones outcast and set upon.

absolutely. And THIS stance benefits the liberal guy..most guys for that matter. it benefits them because the woman sets herself up for being used...and if she conceives then she is alone and responsible for her own predicament, AND should not seek any support in any form from the guy.

warpig
10-18-2010, 11:23 PM
absolutely. And THIS stance benefits the liberal guy..most guys for that matter. it benefits them because the woman sets herself up for being used...and if she conceives then she is alone and responsible for her own predicament, AND should not seek any support in any form from the guy.

agreed.

CueSi
10-19-2010, 01:34 AM
Michelle Bachman, Sarah Palin, and Christine ODonnel are nutters.

What do Repubs have against sanity?

What the fuck has to do with anything... quit misdirecting.

If the Dems care so much about women, why the hell are they acting like misogynistic assholes?

~QC

Gingersnap
10-19-2010, 12:53 PM
I think it's the same old thing: nanny-ism. The Democrats don't see people, they see members of various oppressed and dependent groups. Blacks, kids, old people, women, etc. are all groups that require 24/7 hands-on management to protect their interests. Without a lot of grooming and management, they'd just revert back to being people who have individual agendas and the Democrats don't want that.

Whenever a woman, black, kid, or old person wanders off the reservation, they get hit and hit hard as an example to the others.

Not that the Republicans don't do some grooming of their own but it doesn't seem nearly as much of a personal affront when it's ineffective.

Wei Wu Wei
10-19-2010, 08:15 PM
liberal men don't have anything against women. They love them for sex or for getting whatever it is that the liberal guy needs...money, power and of course the first...sex. They realize how useful women are. They don't think they are for any thing other than the liberal guy's satisfaction of his desire. You want your women to think like you do...sex on demand, anytime, anywhere. You want your woman to bring home the bacon so to speak. You want her parroting the way YOU want her to think and live so that it is to your advantage. You want her to be Jezebel to your King Ahab.

now a palin or o'donnell or angle...those women are too independent. Libs don't like that.

AHHHHHAHAHAH

this is perfect you sweet genius.


Also, for the record, this is one of many reasons people don't like o'donnell:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9SW0ZWzC8s

Lager
10-19-2010, 09:44 PM
Do you ask all your friends questions about Supreme Court decisions before you decide to see them again? Your comment, along with the fact that there are bozos going around with quiz show gotchas to try and trip up female conservative candidates is one of the reasons people don't like contemporary liberals.

Rockntractor
10-19-2010, 09:48 PM
Do you ask all your friends questions about Supreme Court decisions before you decide to see them again? Your comment, along with the fact that there are bozos going around with quiz show gotchas to try and trip up female conservative candidates is one of the reasons people don't like contemporary liberals.

Wei Wei needs to be online election night so we can rub his sorry ass nose in it every time we win a race!

Wei Wu Wei
10-20-2010, 12:42 AM
lol he wants so bad to believe I'm a blue-blooded Democrat.

Calypso Jones
10-20-2010, 12:45 AM
Gotcha moment that the media used on Palin too. And they are lobbing those soft balls at their partners in crime the DAMocrats. We need a CHANGE

Rockntractor
10-20-2010, 12:54 AM
lol he wants so bad to believe I'm a blue-blooded Democrat.

I don't give you credit for being that smart, you are about two levels lower, but you will settle for what your fweible little mind thinks is the lesser of two evils, democrats.

Zathras
10-20-2010, 03:30 AM
lol he wants so bad to believe I'm a blue-blooded Democrat.

Don't really care if you're a brain dead democrat. We do know that you're a brain dead liberal though and any win by a Republican is a loss for you. Prepare to have your nose rubbed raw on November 2nd you waste of skin.

Wei Wu Wei
10-20-2010, 12:25 PM
Don't really care if you're a brain dead democrat. We do know that you're a brain dead liberal though and any win by a Republican is a loss for you. Prepare to have your nose rubbed raw on November 2nd you waste of skin.

Yes I'm the boogy man and the way to scare away the boogyman is to vote for Team R. You got it. Hook line and sinker.