djones520
11-29-2010, 12:53 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9646363
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:06 PM
Original message
What some tip a valet to park their car($20) would have fed 10 people on Thanksgiving Day...
Advertisements [?]Some of our local shelters were asking for contributions of $2 to feed one person on Thanksgiving Day.
And some of our wealthiest citizens waste 10 times that amount to have their cars parked for them. But they insist on receiving tax cuts they don't need and won't spend. And they refuse to help those unemployed, many homeless, and lots with children.
What is wrong with this picture?
I just don't understand how there could be such a lack of compassion.
Drale (983 posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. We can never understand
I don't know about you guys but when I see someone suffering it hurts me, but they feel no such pain. In fact I suspect that more then a few of them would laugh at another's pain. That is one of the big differences between us and them.
sweetapogee (154 posts) Sun Nov-28-10 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. about
10 years ago my niece by hit by a car in upstate NY. She spent 3 weeks in intensive care then was transferred to Shriner's in Phili. where she spent 3 months. Three surgeries, doctor flown in each time from Germany. No cost, no bills to my brother and his wife. In the lobby of the hospital there are plaque's representing individual million dollar donations, some are 5 and even 10 million. My point, some people that have money do good with it.
I bet the alert button got slammed on this freeper troll.
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Waste? Valets aren't exactly top wage-earners either. nt
GKirk (155 posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That was pretty much
what I thought when I read the original post. It kept a couple of valets out of the unemployment line for a little bit.
flvegan (1000+ posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Some of our non-wealthiest "waste" that much on going to the movies.
I see the point you're making, it just doesn't resonate well with me. 20 bucks is 20 bucks. An individual making $200k/year isn't remotely close to "our wealthiest citizens" but are rather just doing a bit better than most of us (depending on where they live).
That said, I agree that it is a shame that more folks with means aren't more charitable. I know a good number are, but a good number aren't.
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. people making $200K a year aren't "just doing a bit better than most of us".
they're the top 5%.
median personal income in 2005 for workers (excluding people on social programs) was about $28K.
so an individual making $200K is doing SEVEN TIMES BETTER or more than every individual from the middle on down.
they're not "our wealthiest," but they're the top of the upper middle class or the bottom of the "wealthiest".
flvegan (1000+ posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. ...and you skim over the "depending on where they live" as usual.
Not that I'm terribly shocked, considering.
JVS (1000+ posts) Sun Nov-28-10 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. $200k is doing fine anywhere.
flvegan (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-29-10 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Define "doing fine" please.
Be articulate.
Lots of stupid.
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:06 PM
Original message
What some tip a valet to park their car($20) would have fed 10 people on Thanksgiving Day...
Advertisements [?]Some of our local shelters were asking for contributions of $2 to feed one person on Thanksgiving Day.
And some of our wealthiest citizens waste 10 times that amount to have their cars parked for them. But they insist on receiving tax cuts they don't need and won't spend. And they refuse to help those unemployed, many homeless, and lots with children.
What is wrong with this picture?
I just don't understand how there could be such a lack of compassion.
Drale (983 posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. We can never understand
I don't know about you guys but when I see someone suffering it hurts me, but they feel no such pain. In fact I suspect that more then a few of them would laugh at another's pain. That is one of the big differences between us and them.
sweetapogee (154 posts) Sun Nov-28-10 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. about
10 years ago my niece by hit by a car in upstate NY. She spent 3 weeks in intensive care then was transferred to Shriner's in Phili. where she spent 3 months. Three surgeries, doctor flown in each time from Germany. No cost, no bills to my brother and his wife. In the lobby of the hospital there are plaque's representing individual million dollar donations, some are 5 and even 10 million. My point, some people that have money do good with it.
I bet the alert button got slammed on this freeper troll.
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Waste? Valets aren't exactly top wage-earners either. nt
GKirk (155 posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That was pretty much
what I thought when I read the original post. It kept a couple of valets out of the unemployment line for a little bit.
flvegan (1000+ posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Some of our non-wealthiest "waste" that much on going to the movies.
I see the point you're making, it just doesn't resonate well with me. 20 bucks is 20 bucks. An individual making $200k/year isn't remotely close to "our wealthiest citizens" but are rather just doing a bit better than most of us (depending on where they live).
That said, I agree that it is a shame that more folks with means aren't more charitable. I know a good number are, but a good number aren't.
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. people making $200K a year aren't "just doing a bit better than most of us".
they're the top 5%.
median personal income in 2005 for workers (excluding people on social programs) was about $28K.
so an individual making $200K is doing SEVEN TIMES BETTER or more than every individual from the middle on down.
they're not "our wealthiest," but they're the top of the upper middle class or the bottom of the "wealthiest".
flvegan (1000+ posts) Sun Nov-28-10 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. ...and you skim over the "depending on where they live" as usual.
Not that I'm terribly shocked, considering.
JVS (1000+ posts) Sun Nov-28-10 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. $200k is doing fine anywhere.
flvegan (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-29-10 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Define "doing fine" please.
Be articulate.
Lots of stupid.