PDA

View Full Version : UN mulls internet regulation options



Rockntractor
12-17-2010, 09:17 PM
By John Hilvert on Dec 17, 2010
WikiLeaks sparks push for tighter controls.

The United Nations is considering whether to set up an inter-governmental working group to harmonise global efforts by policy makers to regulate the internet.

Establishment of such a group has the backing of several countries, spearheaded by Brazil.

At a meeting in New York on Wednesday, representatives from Brazil called for an international body made up of Government representatives that would attempt to create global standards for policing the internet - specifically in reaction to challenges such as WikiLeaks.

The Brazilian delegate stressed, however, that this should not be seen as a call for a "takeover" of the internet.

India, South Africa, China and Saudi Arabia appeared to favour a new possible over-arching inter-government body.

However, Australia, US, UK, Belgium and Canada and attending business and community representatives argued there were risks in forming yet another working group that might isolate itself from the industry, community users and the general public.

"My concern is that if we were to make a move to form a governmental-only body then that would send a very strong signal to civil society that their valuable contribution was not required or was not being looked for," an un-named Australian representative told the meeting.

Debate on the creation of a new inter-governmental body stemmed from a UN Economic and Social Council resolution 2010/2 of 19 July.

The resolution invited the UN Secretary-General "to convene open and inclusive consultations involving all Member States and all other stakeholders with a view to assisting the process towards enhanced cooperation in order to enable Governments on an equal footing to carry out their roles and responsibilities in respect of international public policy issues pertaining to the Internet but not of the day-to-day technical and operational matters that do not impact upon those issues."

Much debate concerned the meaning of "enhanced cooperation" and whether a new inter-governmental body was required. Participants also debated the roles of existing organisations - such as the Internet Governance Forum, ICANN and the ITU.

The IGF - an organisation that informs the UN but makes no decisions - is running close to the end of a five-year mandate, due to expire at the end of the year.

The likes of ISOC, ICANN and more recently the World Information Technology and Services Alliance (WITSA) have recently expressed concerns [PDF] that a working panel to decide on the future of the IGF has been limited to representatives from member-states.

"Australia is a very strong supporter of the Internet Governance Forum," the unidentified Australian UN representative said at the New York meeting this week. "That is very much due to the multi-stake-holder approach of the IGF. It is an inclusive process."

Australia's Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy said that Australian Government welcomed the resolution of the Second Committee of the United Nation General Assembly (UNGA) to extend the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) for a further five years.

The DBCDE said it would like to see the organisation retain an open and participatory membership.

"Australia has always supported the participation of civil society and the private sector in the IGF and regards their participation as being integral to the IGF's success," a spokesman told iTnews.

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/242051,un-mulls-internet-regulation-options.aspx

m00
12-18-2010, 01:15 AM
The internet works fine. Don't fuck with it.

Apache
12-18-2010, 08:22 AM
The internet works fine. Don't fuck with it.

We could get a few servers to act menancing when the UN gets around, they would run the other way...;)

Kay
12-18-2010, 08:27 AM
The internet works fine. Don't fuck with it.

Nowadays the internet is about the only thing that does work.
They don't need to jack with it.

m00
12-18-2010, 01:18 PM
Nowadays the internet is about the only thing that does work.
They don't need to jack with it.

Well, the government's problem is that so many Americans are enjoying something which the government doesn't regulate. Can't have that.

Apache
12-18-2010, 01:28 PM
Well, the government's problem is that so many Americans are enjoying something which the government doesn't regulate. Can't have that.

I don't think so. It may be the vast amount of information that is out on the web that's got them thinking this. The multitude of news and information sites that give differing points of view is what has them in knots...




My two cent.