PDA

View Full Version : Muslim Students Association Pledge of Allegiance: "I will die to establish Islam"



megimoo
03-21-2011, 07:46 AM
Muslim Students Association Pledge of Allegiance: "I will die to establish Islam"

Tell me again how the Muslim Brotherhood-linked Muslim Students Association is not a subversive organization...video

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/03/msa-pledge-of-allegiance-i-will-die-to-establish-islam.html

Comments:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FwIC7agtqE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYnyueBB2A8&NR=1&feature=fvwp

........................
Would you settle for what another conservative thought of Islam?

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.

No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”

Sir Winston Churchill; (Source: The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50 London )

His “the greatest retrograde force exists in the world” is sufficient description of Islam to justify - ISLAM DELENDA EST.... ISLAM must be destroyed"
..............................

AmPat
03-21-2011, 07:31 PM
Muslim Students Association Pledge of Allegiance: "I will die to establish Islam"
I'd like to assist them.:cool:

ABC in Georgia
03-21-2011, 07:55 PM
I'd like to assist them.:cool:

Me too! Gladly, whole-heartedly, and with bells on!

Uh ... make that *bacon-wrapped" bells on!

~ ABC

Odysseus
03-22-2011, 01:41 PM
You need to watch the second video for an example of just how stupid college kids today can get. The speaker, after an interminable series of adolescent interjections ("like...", "you know...") gets to her point, which is that Hamas and the American founders are no different because both fought in civilian clothing and fought from schools, churches and other protected buildings. This is patently false. First, the Continental Army conducted itself as an army. They were organized along European lines and did not fight from the cover of hiding behind civilians. They exclusively engaged British and allied troops. To pretend that a Hamas terrorist who straps on a bomb and walks into a pizza place is the moral equivalent of George Washington is despicable libel or apalling ignorance.

This is what comes from letting the likes of Wei into a classroom.

Articulate_Ape
03-22-2011, 02:27 PM
You need to watch the second video for an example of just how stupid college kids today can get. The speaker, after an interminable series of adolescent interjections ("like...", "you know...") gets to her point, which is that Hamas and the American founders are no different because both fought in civilian clothing and fought from schools, churches and other protected buildings. This is patently false. First, the Continental Army conducted itself as an army. They were organized along European lines and did not fight from the cover of hiding behind civilians. They exclusively engaged British and allied troops. To pretend that a Hamas terrorist who straps on a bomb and walks into a pizza place is the moral equivalent of George Washington is despicable libel or apalling ignorance.

This is what comes from letting the likes of Wei into a classroom.


Hear, hear!

fettpett
03-22-2011, 04:29 PM
You need to watch the second video for an example of just how stupid college kids today can get. The speaker, after an interminable series of adolescent interjections ("like...", "you know...") gets to her point, which is that Hamas and the American founders are no different because both fought in civilian clothing and fought from schools, churches and other protected buildings. This is patently false. First, the Continental Army conducted itself as an army. They were organized along European lines and did not fight from the cover of hiding behind civilians. They exclusively engaged British and allied troops. To pretend that a Hamas terrorist who straps on a bomb and walks into a pizza place is the moral equivalent of George Washington is despicable libel or apalling ignorance.

This is what comes from letting the likes of Wei into a classroom.

they get this bullshit from libel shitty ass teachers in their so called "history" classes and from networks like the "History Channel" that keeps promoting this idiot concept.

Yes, they did a few things that were unconventional like targeting officers with snipers, and the militia's fought, at first, more of a guerrilla warfare, but thats not how the majority of the fighting took place.

Odysseus
03-22-2011, 04:53 PM
they get this bullshit from libel shitty ass teachers in their so called "history" classes and from networks like the "History Channel" that keeps promoting this idiot concept.

Yes, they did a few things that were unconventional like targeting officers with snipers, and the militia's fought, at first, more of a guerrilla warfare, but thats not how the majority of the fighting took place.

Unconventional doesn't equal terrorist. Sniping goes back to the days of the first bows and arrows. The Mongols were loathed by the European knights because they were horse archers, rather than swordsmen, and guerilla warfare has been documented throughout history as well. For a great account of one, read Flavius Josephus' The Jewish War, which described a guerilla campaign against the Roman legions in Judea.

The fact is that most guerrilla campaigns fail because it takes conventional troops to consolidate and advance from the gains of irregular forces, and those organizations that never develop that capacity end up fighting longterm wars of attrition or lose outright, depending on what the other side is willing to do.

fettpett
03-22-2011, 05:07 PM
Unconventional doesn't equal terrorist. Sniping goes back to the days of the first bows and arrows. The Mongols were loathed by the European knights because they were horse archers, rather than swordsmen, and guerilla warfare has been documented throughout history as well. For a great account of one, read Flavius Josephus' The Jewish War, which described a guerilla campaign against the Roman legions in Judea.

The fact is that most guerrilla campaigns fail because it takes conventional troops to consolidate and advance from the gains of irregular forces, and those organizations that never develop that capacity end up fighting longterm wars of attrition or lose outright, depending on what the other side is willing to do.

Doesn't surprise me in the lest. I'm just saying that these are the reasons why these asshats think that equating the two is the same.

Odysseus
03-22-2011, 05:43 PM
Doesn't surprise me in the lest. I'm just saying that these are the reasons why these asshats think that equating the two is the same.

Nah. That's too easy. The reason that they think that they can equate the two is because their profs have taught them that no matter what some bad guys in the world do, it's okay, because America has done things that were just as bad, or almost as bad, or not nearly as bad, but who cares, because it's all about moral equivalence and propaganda. Horowitz missed the point, unfortunately, when he didn't school her in the tactics of the Revolutionary War and the differences between how our founders fought and how Hamas fights. She'll walk out of there knowing no more than when she went in, which pretty much describes her college career.

megimoo
03-22-2011, 06:04 PM
Nah. That's too easy. The reason that they think that they can equate the two is because their profs have taught them that no matter what some bad guys in the world do, it's okay, because America has done things that were just as bad, or almost as bad, or not nearly as bad, but who cares, because it's all about moral equivalence and propaganda. Horowitz missed the point, unfortunately, when he didn't school her in the tactics of the Revolutionary War and the differences between how our founders fought and how Hamas fights. She'll walk out of there knowing no more than when she went in, which pretty much describes her college career.
As you well know there are many reasons for going to college and education has become the lesser .Socially.. it is required in some circles.Politically.. it is an expedient for a career path to the cult of power.Family.. if your parents are college graduates it's expected of you.Foreigner,especially Orientals,value an American education as a path to higher social standing . Arab Jihadist..as a way to further infiltrate America !

Females ...as a way of meeting young men with high earning potentials. ..that one should draw female fire ?

Odysseus
03-23-2011, 10:17 AM
As you well know there are many reasons for going to college and education has become the lesser .Socially.. it is required in some circles.Politically.. it is an expedient for a career path to the cult of power.Family.. if your parents are college graduates it's expected of you.Foreigner,especially Orientals,value an American education as a path to higher social standing . Arab Jihadist..as a way to further infiltrate America !

Females ...as a way of meeting young men with high earning potentials. ..that one should draw female fire ?

And, for increasing their own earning potentials, since our culture is reapidly diminishing the value of family and children, many women will never marry and will have to make their own way. It's a sad, lonely world that the feminists have made.