PDA

View Full Version : Supreme Court Justice Kagan to be investigated??



Constitutionally Speaking
07-03-2011, 11:09 AM
Citing Evidence They Call 'Contradictory' to Kagan's Confirmation Testimony, 49 Lawmakers Call for Judiciary Committee Investigation
Friday, July 01, 2011
By Terence P. Jeffrey

http://www.cnsnews.com/sites/default/files/images/65572.jpg?1273506494

(CNSNews.com) - Forty-nine members of the U.S. House of Representatives--including the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, the chairman of the Republican Policy Committee and two presidential candidates--are pointing to evidence they say is "contradictory" to Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan's confirmation testimony and calling for the House Judiciary Committee to investigate the matter.

The lawmakers also say they believe that evidence already made public shows that Kagan must recuse herself from any court cases involving the health care bill signed into law by President Barack Obama while she was serving as Obama's solicitor general.





http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/breaking-49-house-members-call-investiga

djones520
07-03-2011, 11:21 AM
This could prove interesting.

Novaheart
07-03-2011, 12:00 PM
This could prove interesting.

Probably doesn't have anything to do with the call to impeach Clarence Thomas.

fettpett
07-03-2011, 12:35 PM
Probably doesn't have anything to do with the call to impeach Clarence Thomas.

Thomas' was unfounded and stupid and it was his wife's issue, pretty stupid and them just wanting to get rid of him

if they found evidence that she lied to Congress, while under oath, she can probably be removed, talk about a nail in the coffin for Obama leading into 2012

Bailey
07-03-2011, 12:48 PM
Thomas' was unfounded and stupid and it was his wife's issue, pretty stupid and them just wanting to get rid of him

if they found evidence that she lied to Congress, while under oath, she can probably be removed, talk about a nail in the coffin for Obama leading into 2012

You really think the MSM will allow her to be ousted?

fettpett
07-03-2011, 12:53 PM
You really think the MSM will allow her to be ousted?

fuck the MSM, they can try and spin it however they want, but the facts are the facts and if she's found guilty of perjury she should be removed.

There hasn't been a SCOTUS member impeached since Samuel Chase, doesn't mean there can't be another one

Apocalypse
07-03-2011, 02:45 PM
Thomas' was unfounded and stupid and it was his wife's issue, pretty stupid and them just wanting to get rid of him

if they found evidence that she lied to Congress, while under oath, she can probably be removed, talk about a nail in the coffin for Obama leading into 2012
Even if they can't remove her from the bench for this. The dems will do their damnedest to keep her there. She could be forced to sit out any court hearings on the Healthcare bill its self. And that alone is a major blow.


But at this point, who is heading up the investigations? If it comes down to the DOJ, any one think Holder will call for any thing against her?

fettpett
07-03-2011, 03:27 PM
Even if they can't remove her from the bench for this. The dems will do their damnedest to keep her there. She could be forced to sit out any court hearings on the Healthcare bill its self. And that alone is a major blow.


But at this point, who is heading up the investigations? If it comes down to the DOJ, any one think Holder will call for any thing against her?

I don't believe that this is the DOJ's jurisdiction, it'll be the House with a special investigator, just as with the Clinton Impeachment

SaintLouieWoman
07-03-2011, 04:01 PM
Even if they can't remove her from the bench for this. The dems will do their damnedest to keep her there. She could be forced to sit out any court hearings on the Healthcare bill its self. And that alone is a major blow.


But at this point, who is heading up the investigations? If it comes down to the DOJ, any one think Holder will call for any thing against her?

Good point. That will probably be the only way that they can affect anything. Holder won't do anything, will sit on his hands and stall.

txradioguy
07-09-2011, 04:04 AM
fuck the MSM, they can try and spin it however they want, but the facts are the facts and if she's found guilty of perjury she should be removed.

There hasn't been a SCOTUS member impeached since Samuel Chase, doesn't mean there can't be another one

QFT

AmPat
07-09-2011, 11:13 AM
If Holder were involved, nothing will come of this. If it goes to a majority House, nothing will come of this. Boener has no courage to do the right thing and will cave to political pressure.:mad:

Molon Labe
07-09-2011, 12:24 PM
awesome find CS. CNS news is a pretty good site.

Novaheart
07-09-2011, 12:52 PM
awesome find CS. CNS news is a pretty good site.

They have become more respectable in the last ten years. It used to be more similar to World Net Daily. Brent Bozell is still a parrot.

txradioguy
07-09-2011, 01:54 PM
They have become more respectable in the last ten years. It used to be more similar to World Net Daily. Brent Bozell is still a parrot.

:rolleyes:

He's forgotten more about journalism than most of the MSM mouth breathers ever learned.

Molon Labe
07-09-2011, 01:59 PM
They have become more respectable in the last ten years. It used to be more similar to World Net Daily. Brent Bozell is still a parrot.

Hell....Anyplace that presents alternative news is closer to the "truth" than what the MSM sells.

txradioguy
07-09-2011, 02:16 PM
Hell....Anyplace that presents alternative news is closer to the "truth" than what the MSM sells.

QFT

Novaheart
07-09-2011, 04:49 PM
Hell....Anyplace that presents alternative news is closer to the "truth" than what the MSM sells.

You mean like NPR, Democracy Now, Russia Today, Al jazeera, Real News, and Young Turks?

AmPat
07-11-2011, 10:17 AM
You mean like NPR, Democracy Now, Russia Today, Al jazeera, Real News, and Young Turks?

Those sites are either Parrots or feeder sites for MSNBC. No serious yet sane person watches that news porn site called MSNBC.:cool: