PDA

View Full Version : Queer Preacher Takes on Mike Adams Phd his Letter In Attempt To Have Dr.Adams Fired :



megimoo
09-08-2008, 09:41 AM
The Gaystapo,Mike S. Adams

Queer Preacher Takes on Mike Adams Phd his Letter In Attempt To Have Dr.Adams Fired :

“Mike Adams’ hate speech insults UNC”:
I trust you are aware of the egregiously misinformed hate speech of Mike S. Adams, a UNC faculty member in Criminology. Is this the sort of university representative you take pride in? I hope this dinosaur hasn't got tenure--it's a shame he's teaching at all.

Christopher B. Stewart, PhD Christopher.Stewart@mail.wvu.edu
The bi-sexual reverend from West Virginia at 304.293.2941, x2319


Last Thursday, at 1:58 p.m. EST, I received an email message from a bi-sexual reverend from West Virginia. snip

Your recent "Fat Lesbians on Crack" piece is an example of grossly irresponsible rhetoric that serves ideology, not mental health. It is appalling to me that someone with your lack of intelligence and indifference to professional consensus is actively employed in a teaching role.

I am always delighted when I get moral advice – especially on human sexual relationships - from people who reside in West Virginia. As a native of Mississippi, I find it best to climb up the moral latter one rung at a time. If I move up too quickly my fear of heights could be enough to make me forget all about my fear of queer preachers from West Virginia.

(Author’s Note: When I called the bi-sexual reverend from West Virginia at 304.293.2941, x2319, he said he was not gay but “queer” – specifically a bi-sexual who rejects “essentialist notions of gayness.”)

And I’m also glad whenever I’m lectured about “professional consensus” by queer preachers from West Virginia. Those who actually read my “Fat Lesbians on Crack” piece remember that it was about a counselor who was fired from her job because of her objections to homosexuality.

That is exactly how this “consensus” that homosexuality is not a mental illness is emerging in the counseling profession.

Radical homosexual activists are simply having all the people who hold a contrary view fired.

Read the next line of the queer preacher’s email for a good example:

A counselor who objects to homosexuality per se is an unqualified counselor, one dominated by irrational biases and certain to cause greater harm.

So, what did the queer preacher mean when he said it is “appalling” that one with such “indifference to professional consensus” is “actively employed in a teaching role”? He meant that after the gays fire all of the counselors who do not agree with homosexuality they should commence to fire all the teachers who do not recognize as legitimate the “consensus” they created by firing people.

Of course, before signing off, Reverend Dr. Stewart had a few words to say about theology as well:

Sounds more like the intrusion of false religion--an intrusion whose graver consequence is the substitution of textual authoritarianism for authentic spiritual experience. It is irresponsible in either a clinical or pastoral context.

(Rev) Christopher B. Stewart, PhD Christopher.Stewart@mail.wvu.edu

When the queer preacher warns against substituting “textual authoritarianism” for “authentic spiritual experience” here is what he is saying: It is fun to take out the parts of the Bible you don’t like and substitute your own personal feelings.

Obviously, what queer preachers like the Reverend Dr. Stewart really want is to play the role of God. And when the queer preacher speaks of the irresponsibility of “textual authoritarianism” in the “pastoral context” you know this is precisely what he means: After we fire all of the counselors and teachers who disagree with us, we will target the preachers who disagree with us, too.

Of course, the queer preacher from West Virginia was not going to confine himself to just writing me one nasty little missive. He had to write all of the professors in my department as well as everyone in the Office of the Dean of Arts and Sciences to suggest that I should be fired from UNCW. Here’s the full text of his email – written under the subject line “Mike Adams’ hate speech insults UNC”:

I trust you are aware of the egregiously misinformed hate speech of Mike S. Adams, a UNC faculty member in Criminology. Is this the sort of university representative you take pride in? I hope this dinosaur hasn't got tenure--it's a shame he's teaching at all.

Christopher B. Stewart, PhD Christopher.Stewart@mail.wvu.edu

There is no mention of how I was “misinformed” about the Alliance Defense Fund lawsuit that was the subject of the now infamous “Fat Lesbians on Crack” article. Nor is there any attempt to explain how my defense of a black woman who has lost her job at the hands of the Gaystapo constitutes “hate speech.” I guess it just means he hates to hear me speak.

Of course, this tenured dinosaur from North Carolina is not going to be intimidated by a queer preacher from West Virginia. In fact, I plan to write him this afternoon to tell him where to insert his textual authoritarianism. And I hope you’ll join me in writing the queer preacher to let him know that Americans are getting sick and tired of the Gaystapo and its Nazi tactics.

After I’m done writing I plan to make a donation to the Boy Scouts of America. Then I’ll roast a weenie in Christopher Stewart’s honor.

http://townhall.com/columnists/MikeSAdams/2008/09/08/the_gaystapo?page=full&comments=true

Gingersnap
09-08-2008, 09:59 AM
Gaystapo - totally priceless! :D

PoliCon
09-08-2008, 10:01 AM
please - everyone on the left has been trying for years to get Adams fired. Why does this preacher think he's any better than any of the others?

FlaGator
09-08-2008, 10:31 AM
please - everyone on the left has been trying for years to get Adams fired. Why does this preacher think he's any better than any of the others?

Because he's gay and gay's can do anything when they are not complaining about how culturally down trodden they are. It's always amused me how they tell the world about "Gay Power" and why it's wonderful to be a homosexual while at the same time referencing how stereotyped and discrimiatated against they are and that no one takes them seriously.

megimoo
09-08-2008, 10:58 AM
Because he's gay and gay's can do anything when they are not complaining about how culturally down trodden they are. It's always amused me how they tell the world about "Gay Power" and why it's wonderful to be a homosexual while at the same time referencing how stereotyped and discrimiatated against they are and that no one takes them seriously.Can you imagine going to his church and watching during his sermon and thinking about of him having sex with another man !

FlaGator
09-08-2008, 11:57 AM
Can you imagine going to his church and watching during his sermon and thinking about of him having sex with another man !

I don't think I want to... brrrrr

LibraryLady
09-08-2008, 12:02 PM
Can you imagine going to his church and watching during his sermon and thinking about of him having sex with another man !


to be honest, I don't watch any minister's sermons and think about them having sex with another man OR woman.

megimoo
09-08-2008, 12:14 PM
to be honest, I don't watch any minister's sermons and think about them having sex with another man OR woman.A Total Vacuum ?

wilbur
09-08-2008, 01:00 PM
Can you imagine going to his church and watching during his sermon and thinking about of him having sex with another man !

Wow.


:confused:

megimoo
09-08-2008, 01:19 PM
Wow.


:confused:Are you confused ?

wilbur
09-08-2008, 01:21 PM
Are you confused ?

Just amazed, really.

Space Gravy
09-08-2008, 01:45 PM
to be honest, I don't watch any minister's sermons and think about them having sex with another man OR woman.

Jim and Tammy Fae Baker..........Ewwwwwww!:eek:

FlaGator
09-08-2008, 03:21 PM
Just amazed, really.

If I could visualizie any male priest or minister having sex with a man, I pretty certain that would classify me as a homosexual or maybe just deeply distrubed.

noonwitch
09-08-2008, 03:25 PM
If I could visualizie any male priest or minister having sex with a man, I pretty certain that would classify me as a homosexual or maybe just deeply distrubed.


It's easy to imagine anything these days, whether it's because of the stuff you see on the internet or because of the stuff you see on tv.

OZ has made it possible for me to visualize men having sex, the way viewing one porno flick has made it possible to visualize women having sex.

wineslob
09-08-2008, 04:56 PM
Professing to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man -- and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator…. For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.

Leviticus 20:13 "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

Pretty much says it all.

Gingersnap
09-08-2008, 05:41 PM
It's easy to imagine anything these days, whether it's because of the stuff you see on the internet or because of the stuff you see on tv.

OZ has made it possible for me to visualize men having sex, the way viewing one porno flick has made it possible to visualize women having sex.

See, this is why I stick with News of the Weird. I may be easily able to visualize a kid with 8 limbs or a goat with two heads or even the Montauk monster but I'm not troubled by intrusive sexual imagery from porn. I've never even heard of OZ in this context. Thankfully.

megimoo
09-08-2008, 07:31 PM
See, this is why I stick with News of the Weird. I may be easily able to visualize a kid with 8 limbs or a goat with two heads or even the Montauk monster but I'm not troubled by intrusive sexual imagery from porn. I've never even heard of OZ in this context. Thankfully.

I thankfully have no trouble with listening to people speaking, male or female ,without stray images popping into my mind.People of reputation like Billie Graham or the Pope speaking about their experiences with GOD are very real and are to be looked up to because of their sterling reputations and their faith .

But if a former female x rated video pron star with a wide circulation that I had seen gave a similar
testimony there would be image problems !

The same is true on meeting a new customer or client I haven't met before and listening to them talk about their needs I tend to form opinions as I listen to them talk,I think that we all do.If they seem to know the technical details of their problems I would grow in admiration of them and their grasp of what is needed to solve their problem.

PoliCon
09-08-2008, 07:39 PM
Wow.


:confused:On this - we agree.

MrsSmith
09-08-2008, 07:42 PM
to be honest, I don't watch any minister's sermons and think about them having sex with another man OR woman.

Yeah, no kidding. Sheesh. :eek: I wouldn't enjoy this man's preaching because he obviously hasn't studied the subject he's teaching, but that would be about it. :rolleyes: I think meg was a little stressed out, or something.

MrsSmith
09-08-2008, 07:44 PM
Originally Posted by wilbur
Wow.



On this - we agree.

I don't know...I have to wonder just how he meant that 'Wow." Was it negative, or positive?? :eek:

wilbur
09-08-2008, 10:02 PM
I don't know...I have to wonder just how he meant that 'Wow." Was it negative, or positive?? :eek:

We'll just have to let Megimoo's imagination run wild with that one....

;)