PDA

View Full Version : Dear right wing lurkers. About that google definition of "santorum"



Carol
01-08-2012, 05:28 PM
link (http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002138582)

OK, stinky, I'll bite. Here's the attention you crave, for yourself, the democrat party, DU, and your fellow liberals.

If anyone had any question about the mentality, stupidity and immaturity of liberals they can no longer question it.

And liberals are proud of it.


Star Member Stinky The Clown (44,306 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

Dear right wing lurkers. About that google definition of "santorum"
It isn't an unfortunate coincidence that predates your boy. It IS your boy. It IS about him.

It started as an intentional Google bomb and may now be one of the most successful in history.

Ha Ha Ha.

In case any of this is unclear, Google up "Santorum" and see what the Number One hit is.

Santorum
spreadingsantorum.com/
Santorum 1. The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex. 2. Senator Rick Santorum.
12,569 people +1'd this


Ha Ha Ha

proud2BlibKansan (89,532 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
1. It's proof Google is liberal!

At least that's what a wingnut told me.

justiceischeap (6,292 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
2. It's proof that education is a good thing.

Conservatives could do this too if they were witty enough.

Response to justiceischeap (Reply #2)

Sun Jan 8, 2012, 01:48 PM

Mira (12,735 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
3. Good point.

Wit and appreciation for art and beauty of any kind seems to be lacking in them. And I say this without malice, it is an observation I have made over the years.

One more thing it does say is that for all their screeching about how homosexuality (anal sex) is "normal", "just another lifestyle" and should be accepted (and celebrated) that it it REALLY ISN'T ANY OF THOSE THINGS if it can be used in an attempt to mock and "shame" another person.

This says more about liberals than it does Santorum or conservatives. They think it "shames" Santorum, but conservatives (probably including Santorum) only see it as reflecting on who liberals are and what they stand for.

It is liberals who should be deeply ashamed about this, but they are too consumed with feeling good about how they can denigrate another person (or at least how they think they can) to see how it reflects back on themselves.

Apache
01-08-2012, 05:43 PM
Bottom-feeders always go for the easy fruit... DU and the occupy movement are all the proof needed. :rolleyes:

txradioguy
01-08-2012, 05:48 PM
Bottom-feeders always go for the easy fruit... DU and the occupy movement are all the proof needed. :rolleyes:

And Stinky The Clown went straight for the horse apples.

Elspeth
01-08-2012, 05:57 PM
Star Member Stinky The Clown (44,306 posts)
....

Santorum
spreadingsantorum.com/
Santorum 1. The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex. 2. Senator Rick Santorum.




justiceischeap (6,292 posts)
2. It's proof that education is a good thing.

Conservatives could do this too if they were witty enough.



Mira (12,735 posts)

Wit and appreciation for art and beauty of any kind seems to be lacking in them. And I say this without malice, it is an observation I have made over the years


In what universe does equating a politician with excrement and bodily fluids qualify as demonstrating either education, wit, or an appreciation of art or beauty?

In what universe did Einstein or Leonardo or Dorothy Parker resort to shit and semen jokes in their professional discourse?

Obviously, the Dummies can't distinguish the rank immaturity of perennial junior high miscreant, Dan Savage, from the theory of relativity, the Mona Lisa, or "A Telephone Call". Savage's immature droppings are nothing to be proud of, and those Dummies that identify with them are saying more about themselves than they realize.

AmPat
01-08-2012, 06:08 PM
The biggest achievement that DUers accomplish is cleaning the bus windows with their tongues. Anything "funny" to a DUer has something to do with perverse sex or potty humor. It gives them enough diversion to allow them to switch the finger in their nostrils.:cool:

DumbAss Tanker
01-08-2012, 07:08 PM
Smeg-heads, the lot of them. Look it up, Stinky.

Rockntractor
01-08-2012, 07:13 PM
Google should be ashamed for having that at the top of their search list and refusing to remove it.

Kay
01-08-2012, 07:17 PM
Google should be ashamed for having that at the top of their search list and refusing to remove it.

You can bet if that had been in reference to Barry it would have been taken down immediately!

JB
01-08-2012, 07:19 PM
Wit and appreciation for art and beauty of any kind seems to be lacking in themRight, because it's DUpukes and OccupyScum that financially contribute to the sustainability of museums, the opera, the ballet and the orchestra.

As far as I'm concerned they can keep on believing we don't have an appreciation for art because I do not want them running in my circles. Except the ballet. They can go there. I don't.

nightflight
01-08-2012, 09:37 PM
One more thing it does say is that for all their screeching about how homosexuality (anal sex) is "normal", "just another lifestyle" and should be accepted (and celebrated) that it it REALLY ISN'T ANY OF THOSE THINGS if it can be used in an attempt to mock and "shame" another person.

Goes for "teabagger" as well.

Elspeth
01-08-2012, 10:09 PM
Anything "funny" to a DUer has something to do with perverse sex or potty humor. It gives them enough diversion to allow them to switch the finger in their nostrils.:cool:


It appears we are gaining some traction in DUmmieland:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002139093



xchrom

“Heterosexuality is not normal, it's just common.” Dorothy Parker
what should be said every time some bigot opens his or her mouth.


Obviously a reference to my post mentioning Dorothy Parker above (http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showpost.php?p=473796&postcount=4), since I have rarely seen a Dummie refer to her. :)

But of course, xchrom and friends miss the point I made about Parker: in the statement xchrom quotes, Parker was not attempting to assassinate the character of a particular person for his lifetime with a crude, Savage-like attack, complete with fecal matter, lube, and bodily fluids. Parker was merely stating her opinion on human sexuality in general. To equate Dan Savage's character assassination with Parker's droll philosophical statement makes not one iota of logical sense. Then again, our friends in DUmmieland have never been known for their stellar brains. :)

So, since they are clearly reading this thread, here is a message to the DUmmies: There is no way to compare a skilled and gifted literary light to the junior high gross-out prank of that man-child, Dan Savage. And to decide that a person is a bigot because he or she disdains corrosive and vulgar pranks that destroy any person's reputation is entirely nonsensical and wrong.

Savage is a monkey throwing feces and thinking he is a wit. Those of you who admire the feces he has splashed on the wall as some kind of educated, witty form of artistic expression need to actually study art and literature.

In general, the left's infatuation with Savage's google bomb is infantile. And the more childish gay activists act, the less likely the adults in the room will think they are ready for the responsibilities of marriage.

AmPat
01-08-2012, 10:31 PM
Star Member WorseBeforeBetter
6. Dorothy Parker would be *lost* on the bigots...

View profile
bless their little hearts. (Geez, six years in the South and I'm finally catching on...)
It obviously escapes this DUmmy that all the evidence of bigotry comes from the left. As for the South, please leave immediately before you pollute God's country with your vile self.

Elspeth
01-08-2012, 11:52 PM
It obviously escapes this DUmmy that all the evidence of bigotry comes from the left. As for the South, please leave immediately before you pollute God's country with your vile self.

WorseBeforeBetter needs to be reminded that it was Southern Democrats that kept Jim Crow alive and kicking.

Carol
01-09-2012, 12:00 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002139171


right on maude... (29 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

View profile

What is all the s******ing about Santorum...
I mean the frothy mix part of things. Okay, I will admit that I have chuckled at Dan Savage's savage attempt at payback for Ricky's seemingly anti-gay crusade, but consider this:

If gay man-sex should not be looked upon with disgust, why does Dan create such a nasty image of the by-product of said action?


Star Member justiceischeap (6,317 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
7. Dan Savage asked his readers to coin the definition

View profile
Not all of his readers are homosexual, so the definition for Santorum, the frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex, was the chosen winner. The whole reason Savage did this was because of this:

Santorum made his comments in an April 2003 interview with the Associated Press. Discussing a recent United States Supreme Court decision striking down an anti-sodomy law, Santorum said:

If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything… It all comes from, I would argue, this right to privacy that doesn't exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution... You say, well, it's my individual freedom. Yes, but it destroys the basic unit of our society because it condones behavior that's antithetical to strong healthy families... In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be. It is one thing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_for_%22santorum%22_neologism

So, in a way it could be argued that associating Santorum with something that most would associate with gay sex is the intent because Santorum is so staunchly against homosexuality, is irony and not humor.

right on maude... (29 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
8. I don't know if it's ironic but it seems pretty contradictory.

I read his column every week because he's a bright, funny individual (plus the freaky stuff people are into). But I always go away with this feeling that describing sex acts in such crude terms and advocating for anything (as long as both people are into it) really treats sex in an animalistic fashion. If we are evolved beings, shouldn't we act in a more enlightened way?It just goes to prove that many liberals are NOT enlightened, but are at the emotional and developmental level as a 9 year old.

Star Member Dreamer Tatum (6,024 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
4. +1 if anal sexual congress, especially between men, is supposed be as dignified

View profile
as any other sexual practice, that attitude is totally at odds with the shame many are trying to attach to Santorum.

But as I have said, pee pee and poo poo and gay jokes seem to be perfectly appropriate for people who consider themselves
more evolved than those they ridicule. "Consider themselves" is the operative words here.

JoePhilly (10,151 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
28. Very simple ... Which by product of "man-sex" (your term) upset "Frothy Santorum" and ...

View profile
his supporters most?

To Santorum, and many in the GOP, to be called "gay" ... or "sissy" ... or "girly man" ... as an attack intended to diminish the opponent.

And so, the response here is to call Frothy Santorum" that which he would use to diminish others.

Those who don't "get that" ... might hust have issues similar to "Frothy's".Smearing someone else because that is what you THINK that person would say to diminish others.

No, it simply reflects back on the person trying to smear Santorum. And on homosexuality.

Carol
01-09-2012, 12:06 AM
Star Member jberryhill (21,062 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
13. You might want to look at the posting history of our new friend

View profile

Last edited Sun Jan 8, 2012, 04:24 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Incidentally, the point of the OP, posted by this now-tombstoned troll, was to get "s******ing" in a headline.


If gay man-sex should not be looked upon with disgust, why does Dan create such a nasty image of the by-product of said action?

So the gay presence, and liberal PC influence on DU is enough to get someone tombstoned for asking this question?

Elspeth
01-09-2012, 12:13 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002139171

It just goes to prove that many liberals are NOT enlightened, but are at the emotional and developmental level as a 9 year old.


They're enjoying this the same way that they enjoy making farts with their armpits.

txradioguy
01-09-2012, 04:43 AM
In what universe does equating a politician with excrement and bodily fluids qualify as demonstrating either education, wit, or an appreciation of art or beauty?



The same universe that thinks "Piss Christ" is art.

noonwitch
01-09-2012, 02:08 PM
I'm not justifying Dan Savage and his fans' use of Santorum to describe what they are using it to describe.

Savage was responding to Rick's comparison of homosexuality to "man on dog action" (Rick's words). It is an insult to gays to compare them to those who abuse animals.

txradioguy
01-09-2012, 03:09 PM
I'm not justifying Dan Savage and his fans' use of Santorum to describe what they are using it to describe.

And yet...


Savage was responding to Rick's comparison of homosexuality to "man on dog action" (Rick's words). It is an insult to gays to compare them to those who abuse animals.

Not only do you in the next breath justify it you defend it.

You have to be quite a contortionist these days to be a Libtard.



right on maude... (29 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore


as any other sexual practice, that attitude is totally at odds with the shame many are trying to attach to Santorum.

You mean like calling TEA Party members tea baggers?

:rolleyes:

Elspeth
01-09-2012, 06:43 PM
I'm not justifying Dan Savage and his fans' use of Santorum to describe what they are using it to describe.

Savage was responding to Rick's comparison of homosexuality to "man on dog action" (Rick's words). It is an insult to gays to compare them to those who abuse animals.

The degree to which Savage escalated his "shitty" prank went above and beyond anything remotely necessary. In 2003 (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/05/rick-santorum-homosexuality-man-on-dog_n_1187103.html), Rick Santorum made a derogatory comment heard by, at most, a single-digit percentage of the American people, most of whom didn't know or care who Santorum was. The man-on-dog comment would have evaporated after its millisecond of fame with CSPAN viewers and other political junkies, and no one would have remembered it afterwards.

What Savage did was create an everlasting Google character assassination that could never be removed. Aided and abetted by his friends on MSNBC (Maddow, O'Donnell), Current TV (Olbermann), HBO (Bill Maher) and Comedy Central (Stewart, Colbert), Savage spread the Google bomb far and wide, with exhortations for young, tech savvy gays and liberals to "Google Santorum."

And Savage has never stopped. The comment was made in 2003--2003! Think about that. 2003 was the beginning of the Iraq War, the SARS outbreak, Hurricane Isabel, the space shuttle Columbia, the very first Pirates of the Carribean movie, Kelly Clarkson's first big hit, and no Lady Gaga in sight.

Isn't there a point where Savage's lethally bitchy need for revenge is sated?

Or is Google now the way for the temporarily personally aggrieved to destroy people's reputations forever?

txradioguy
01-10-2012, 04:35 AM
Isn't there a point where Savage's lethally bitchy need for revenge is sated?

Not when it's a Liberal skewering a Republican on one of their pet issues.


Or is Google now the way for the temporarily personally aggrieved to destroy people's reputations forever?

As long as that person is not Liberal...the answer is yes.

And lets not forget too one of the higherups in Google now works in the Obama administration.

BadCat
01-10-2012, 09:21 AM
Just wait until later this year and the moonbats google anyting with "obama" in it.

noonwitch
01-10-2012, 09:38 AM
And yet...



Not only do you in the next breath justify it you defend it.

You have to be quite a contortionist these days to be a Libtard.



:rolleyes:


Where did I justify Savage's actions? His response was childish and gross, and it undermined any point he might have been making about Santorum's words.

I find Santorum's comparison of gays to dog f@&$%^s to be as offensive as Savage's campaign to use Santorum's name in such an icky way.

Odysseus
01-10-2012, 10:30 AM
In what universe does equating a politician with excrement and bodily fluids qualify as demonstrating either education, wit, or an appreciation of art or beauty?

In what universe did Einstein or Leonardo or Dorothy Parker resort to shit and semen jokes in their professional discourse?
None, but that was back in the day when there were standards. As Tx pointed out, in a world where Robert Mapplethorpe's porn photos, Karen Finley's scatological stripper act and Piss Christ are considered art, the DUmpsters are aesthetically sophisticated solons. In the real world, of course, they're infantile dolts.


Just wait until later this year and the moonbats google anyting with "obama" in it.

Uh oh... Cat, did you do something, shall we say, less than honorable to Google?

BadCat
01-10-2012, 12:24 PM
Well Ody, the libbats seem to think that their side is the only side with any techie savvy. (as they think themselves the center of the world and all). They are very mistaken. Our side has lots of tech savvy, only it's a lot more "dark".

NJCardFan
01-10-2012, 12:52 PM
None, but that was back in the day when there were standards. As Tx pointed out, in a world where Robert Mapplethorpe's porn photos, Karen Finley's scatological stripper act and Piss Christ are considered art, the DUmpsters are aesthetically sophisticated solons. In the real world, of course, they're infantile dolts.



Uh oh... Cat, did you do something, shall we say, less than honorable to Google?

Don't forget putting sweet potatoes up one's bum, defecating them out, and someone eating them. Yes, this is considered art. Worse yet, it was paid for by the National Endowment for the Arts. In other words, your tax dollars.

Elspeth
01-10-2012, 05:18 PM
Don't forget putting sweet potatoes up one's bum, defecating them out, and someone eating them. Yes, this is considered art. Worse yet, it was paid for by the National Endowment for the Arts. In other words, your tax dollars.

And the government destroys culture.

Like it destroyed education.

:mad: