PDA

View Full Version : MO, MN, and CO tonight



djones520
02-07-2012, 10:39 PM
Results are starting to come in. Looks like Santorum might have Missouri locked up. 27% in, and he's dominating so far. Minnesota will most likely go to him as well. He's also holding a lead early on in Colorado. This could be a HUAGE night for Santorum if things continue as they are.

djones520
02-07-2012, 10:57 PM
Fox declares Santorum as the winner of Missouri. Still holding a solid lead in the other two states.

mike128
02-07-2012, 11:38 PM
Results are starting to come in. Looks like Santorum might have Missouri locked up. 27% in, and he's dominating so far. Minnesota will most likely go to him as well. He's also holding a lead early on in Colorado. This could be a HUAGE night for Santorum if things continue as they are.
HOORAY!!
:party:

djones520
02-07-2012, 11:39 PM
Fox just gave Minnesota to Santorum. No new numbers have come in for Colorado in a while so no updates there.

Odysseus
02-07-2012, 11:43 PM
I guess that it's Santorum's turn to be not-Romney. I'll certainly take him over Romney, although I wish that he had a bit more executive experience, but he is a solid conservative who will repeal Obamacare.

djones520
02-07-2012, 11:55 PM
I guess that it's Santorum's turn to be not-Romney. I'll certainly take him over Romney, although I wish that he had a bit more executive experience, but he is a solid conservative who will repeal Obamacare.

Yeah, I've paid no attention to him so far this season, but I just read up on him, and I can support him without any qualms.

Chuck58
02-08-2012, 12:14 AM
Missouri was something else. Take one of the other candidates out (Newt in this case) and Romney got his butt handed to him.

I'm not figuring in Ron Paul, since he's running in some alternate universe of his own.

djones520
02-08-2012, 12:24 AM
Colorado is coming in now. CNN has it at 26% reporting in with Santorum again leading in a land slide.

djones520
02-08-2012, 12:24 AM
It's a shame all three were non-binding tonight. I think we'd have had a clear front runner after this one.

Chuck58
02-08-2012, 12:51 AM
I guess that it's Santorum's turn to be not-Romney. I'll certainly take him over Romney, although I wish that he had a bit more executive experience, but he is a solid conservative who will repeal Obamacare.

And watch the Romney people, GOP, media and Washington elite start hammering Santorum.

Romney is who they all want, maybe to include the obamachine.

Hawkgirl
02-08-2012, 02:13 AM
what does non-binding mean??:confused:

djones520
02-08-2012, 02:27 AM
what does non-binding mean??:confused:

The delegates aren't required to vote for the candidate who won. Thats what I gather at least.

djones520
02-08-2012, 02:38 AM
http://projects.wsj.com/campaign2012/delegates

Click on the note for each state. It says how the delegates get handled.

EazyMack
02-08-2012, 03:51 AM
Should I get my hopes up yet?

I'll take either Newt or Santorum. I'd love to see Newt debate Obama, but Santorum has shown to be pretty feisty in a debate himself. Santorum's values line right up with what I'd love to see for this country, too.

fettpett
02-08-2012, 09:22 AM
MO didn't have any delegates and was non-binding, but CO and MN caucuses were as far as I can tell. He's jumped up ahead of Dr. Nutz

fettpett
02-08-2012, 09:22 AM
http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/scorecard/statebystate/r

Madisonian
02-08-2012, 06:57 PM
Minnesota also elected Jesse "The Body" Ventura and Al Franken.
Not necessarily a ringing endorsement.

Also have to wonder how many D's either registered as R's or voted for Santorum thinking he may be easier to beat than Mittster. We may doubt the intellect of most liberals, but a reverse "Operation Chaos" does not take a rocket surgeon to pull it off.