PDA

View Full Version : You Might Be A Liberal If...



NJCardFan
03-31-2012, 02:59 AM
I don't go to Free Republic but googled "you might be a liberal" and found this(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1523568/posts):

You are against the War on Terror, but are only too happy to make millions of dollars by making movies about it.

You preach about the evils of Capitalism from the comfort of your Beverly Hills estate

You cry about "profiterring corporations", but still demand your weekly paycheck.

You think "rich people" are evil, but are willing to over-look the fact that Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, George Soros, Michael Moore, and Al Franken are "rich", as well.

You scream and shout when innocent civilians are accidentally caught in the cross-fire, but remain silent when terrorists kill them on purpose

You think OJ Simpson is really looking for the "real killers"

You think claim a higher moral ground in opposing the death penalty, but celebrate killing of innocent un-born babies

You think America deserved 9/11

You think the troops are "war criminals", but a thug who killed somebody in cold blood is just a "victim of society"

You think you can give a dollar to somebody, without first having to take it from somebody elsed

You want to ban and outlaw legal gun ownership, yet the same time, you want to be allowed to have armed guards at your beck-and-call

You think Ted Kennedy knows how to manage your money, better than you do.

You think Saddam, Kim Jong Il, and Castro were fairly elected, but President Bush was not

You fail to see the connection between Lenin and Lennon

You think "tolerance" is reserved for those who share your opinions, views, and ideals

You think the name of God/Jesus should be banned and censored, except when spoken in profanity

You think it was wrong for Bush to use images of 9/11 in political ads, but saw nothing wrong with Kerry using flag-draped caskets in his ads.

You refuse to allow a child to carry a Bible to school, but demand that schools make special provisions to accommodate a non-Christian's religious beliefs.

You whine about religious leaders involvment in politics, but only when the Reverend's name is Robertson...not Jackson or Sharpton

You support radical Judges who interpret what they "think" the Constitution means, instead of what it actually says.

You think the meaning and definition of the Constitution should change, based on your own feelings or opinions.

You constantly cry about defense spending, but scream when bases in your areas are closed.

You think Greenpeace and the Earth Liberation Front burning down SUV dealerships or torching chemical plants "help" the enviroment.

You support low-income housing, until they start to build in your neighborhood.

You think the term "illegal alien" is a bad word

You think Michael Moore's films are "historically accurate"

You believe the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of federal funding

You believe that there was no art before Federal funding

You think the only thing wrong with the forged Rather Memo, was people refused to believe it.

You think girls should be allowed to go to an all-boy school, but not the other way around

You support welfare for illegal immigrants who don't pay taxes, anyway

You think Fox News distorts the truth, but Dan Rather reports "honest journalism".

You complain that we never give peace a chance

When asked about your favorite Marx Brother, the first one to come to mind is Karl.

You think NPR is the only really fair and balanced news source

You think race riots are acceptable

You think racial hatred is wrong, but "class hatred" is acceptable

You think that every misbehaving child has ADD and needs to be doped-up on Ritalin.

You think lawsuits that deny any personal responsibility on the part of the plantiff is justified.

You think the best way to deal with terrorist regimes is to please and appease them.

You are opposed to a military presence in Europe, unless it's to bail out France

You would rather defend Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Saddam and Castro before you defend the US

You think violent gun-crime would automatically disappear if honest citizens could not bear arms.

You constantly equate Conservatives to the likes of Hilter as your only defense

You believe 1 + 1 = 2, or 3, or 4...or whatever it takes to protect the child's self-esteem

You think that porn should be federally protected per Freedom of Speech, but public profession of Faith should be outlawed.

You applaud Jimmy Carter for talking about Human Rights, but screamed and shouted when President Bush actually did something about it.

You think we should have given Saddam 12 more years, and then 12 more on top of that, if he didn't comply by then

You think the UN should be the final authority, even in the U.S.

You think if a person makes more than $50,000/year, then he/she is cheating people and ripping them off.

NJCardFan
03-31-2012, 03:00 AM
Con't...

You think being able to play the President on a popular TV drama automatically equates to "political wisdom" in real life.

You scream and shout about Christians ramming their beliefs upon you, but you say nothing when Athiests do the same

You think it was "un-ethical" for Bush to accept campaign donations from the NRA, but not when Clinton accepted campaign donations on behaf of the Communist Chinese government.

You think if somebody disagrees w/what is being said, they are challenging or denying your rights to Free Speech

You think that poverty is caused by the wealthy

You think the ACLU really gives a damn about individual rights

You think the Dixie Chicks and Tim Robbins should say what they want, but O'reilly, Hannity, and Limbaugh should be censored

You protested American intervention in the Middle-East, because we did not have UN approval, but supported American intervention in Haiti, Somalia, and Bosnia, even though we did not have UN approval.

You screamed and shouted when Ah-Nold allegedly groped women, but cheered when Bill Clinton did the same.

You are against sexual harrasment except when committed by a Kennedy or a Clinton

You object to little old ladies wearing fur, but not bikers wearing leather

You believe President Bush is too dumb to be President and Arnold Schwarzenegger is too dumb to be Governor of California, but the Dixie Chicks, Martin Sheen, Alec Baldwin, Barbra Streisand, Eddie Vedder and Jeanine Garofalo are qualified to discourse at length on foreign policy

You think Saddam had WMDs when Clinton was in office, but all of the sudden, didn't have them when Bush was in office.

You think the Middle East crisis can only be solved once Israel is wiped off the map.

You believe the Bible is racist, sexist, and homophobic, but think the Koran should be required reading

You consider the Catholic bishops noble and idealistic when they oppose capital punishment and welfare cuts but dangerous fanatics when trying to promote pro-life

You think a lawyer taking 33% from a settlement for his services is fair, but the Government taking 33% of your paycheck for taxes is "too low"

You find Christianity and anything relating to it potentially harmful to you and your children, but you're completely open-minded to Witchcraft, occult-ism, mysticism, ect

You think having an open-mind means being "pro-Gay", "pro-Abortion", "anti-Christian", "anti-Business", and "anti-Conservative"

You think only white people can be racist

You think that tax cuts hurt poor people and are uncompassionate but taking 30% from their paychecks is compassionate

You believe that posting the "Ten Commandments" in schools will hurt the children, but promoting homosexuality and paganism "helps" the children

You think the answer to ANY crime no matter how henious or serious, is counseling.

You only watch "All in The Family", because Meathead made so much sense

You think Rush Limbaugh and Michael Reagan are mean spirited racists and promote hate crime but Maxine Waters, John Conyers and Louis Farakahn aren't and don't

You think that Doctors should be made into government bureaucrats, but that lawyers should not

You think O.J. is actually innocent, but that Bernard Goetz is not

You would have supported the war in Iraq, if Clinton or Gore was President

You are against censorship unless it's censoring race, Christianity, Conservatism, Western culture, Rush Limbaugh, or Ann Coulter

You make snide remarks about guys who look at women, but champion Clinton's right to do whatever he wants with his interns

You think that the four cops who beat Rodney King should have been thrown in jail forever, but the four thugs who beat Reginald Denny should get just a slap on the wrist

You get mad when rape victims' sexual history is plastered all over the news media, but demand Paula Jones' sexual history "must be made public"

You hear a news report of a man beat nearly to death because he is a minority or gay and you rally about punishing the bigot who committed the terrible act BUT, if you hear a news report of a man beat nearly to death for his money, and you start talking about the poor disadvantaged person who is forced to commit such acts to survive

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are a lot, lot more but are too many to post...unless you want me to.

Janice
03-31-2012, 09:37 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c

"How Modern Liberals Think"

Edit: Long video, but well worth the time.

Wei Wu Wei
04-01-2012, 12:18 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c

"How Modern Liberals Think"

Edit: Long video, but well worth the time.

I think this is a far more accurate analysis of liberal thought and it's shortcomings:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpAMbpQ8J7g

hai
04-01-2012, 02:57 PM
Humor must contain a grain of truth,this is a whooping ,FAIL!

Retread
04-01-2012, 04:30 PM
"How Modern Liberals Think"

Edit: Long video, but well worth the time.

Say it, Sayet - Thanks Jan.

hai
04-01-2012, 05:15 PM
I don't go to Free Republic but googled "you might be a liberal" and found this(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1523568/posts):



You support radical Judges who interpret what they "think" the Constitution means, instead of what it actually says.

This one is bullshit,going by this thinking,the people who made the woman's right to vote,outlawed prohibition in the US Constitution,and made it illegal to discriminate based on gender,and Brown vs board of education were activist judges.

You think the meaning and definition of the Constitution should change, based on your own feelings or opinions.

This one is bullshit,the US Constitution is a living breathing document,stuff like the woman's right to vote was added to it.

You believe the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of federal funding

Well to be able to treat AIDS,you have to fund research and such. Cancer was once thought untreatable,but new research is making it to finally beat cancer.

You believe that there was no art before Federal funding

That is bull


You think that porn should be federally protected per Freedom of Speech, but public profession of Faith should be outlawed.

Well,what part of "Congress shall make no law respecting a establishment of religion" don't you understand



Thanks,i enjoyed it.

Zathras
04-01-2012, 06:50 PM
Humor must contain a grain of truth,this is a whooping ,FAIL!

Heh, and you're the expert on fail judging on what you've posted here since you first came here.

hai
04-01-2012, 06:56 PM
Heh, and you're the expert on fail judging on what you've posted here since you first came here.

I use to be a adventurer such as yourself,till i took arrow to the knee.

Zathras
04-01-2012, 07:01 PM
I use to be a adventurer such as yourself,till i took arrow to the knee.

Translation: I've run out of coherant responses to your posts so I'll reply with a tired and worn out internet meme that has nothing to do with the subject being discussed.

In other words, you're imitating Agent Smith from The Matrix when it comes to dodging questions...

http://www.cmi.ac.in/~arnab/AgentDodgingBullets.jpg

Retread
04-01-2012, 07:07 PM
Thanks,i enjoyed it.

We knew you were full of BS before this ya know.....

hai
04-01-2012, 07:49 PM
We knew you were full of BS before this ya know.....

Dude,what?

Gentleman Pirate
04-01-2012, 08:01 PM
I use to be a adventurer such as yourself,till i took arrow to the knee.

This Skyrim meme is so overplayed.. Jesus..

Apache
04-01-2012, 09:41 PM
Dude,what?

post #7, the one you fucked up with your supposed fisking skills...

before you respond to something, know about the subject you are responding to...

you would've have been the ad contestant on "are you smarter than a 5th grader"...

Apache
04-01-2012, 09:45 PM
This Skyrim meme is so overplayed.. Jesus..

not the best phrase here....:biggrin-new:

NJCardFan
04-01-2012, 11:02 PM
You think that porn should be federally protected per Freedom of Speech, but public profession of Faith should be outlawed.

Well,what part of "Congress shall make no law respecting a establishment of religion" don't you understand

I understand it fine. What part of "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" don't you understand? See like the Bible, you liberals like to cherry pick what you want from the Constitution. Like now, you cherry picked one aspect of the First Amendment while completely ignoring the rest. You idiots do it all the time. You think having idiocy like the OWS protests being broken up is a violation of your right to assemble but you idiots always forget the "peaceably assemble" part of that. Shitting on police cars is not peaceably assembling. Nor is breaking windows and setting fire to cars. Nor is intimidating school children or preventing citizens from going to work. See, conservatives take the entire thing into context, not what we can glean from it. I can find examples where school kids were reprimanded for praying in school. Do you get jazzed about their rights being violated? Something tells me no. So you can take your attempt at snarkiness and rub it on your chest.

hai
04-02-2012, 02:40 PM
Heh, and you're the expert on fail judging on what you've posted here since you first came here.

Of course i find Conservatives to be the most unhappy people there are,they seem so concerned with fitting in , that they can't enjoy life on their own terms. Because IMHO,people should do whatever makes them happy,as long as it doesn't harm anyone.

Odysseus
04-02-2012, 03:53 PM
Of course i find Conservatives to be the most unhappy people there are,they seem so concerned with fitting in , that they can't enjoy life on their own terms. Because IMHO,people should do whatever makes them happy,as long as it doesn't harm anyone.

You are aware that according to a number of studies, conservatives tend to be happier than liberals? No?

Apache
04-02-2012, 06:47 PM
http://www.lolcats.com/images/u/07/32/lolcatsdotcomclu5vrpst727hzii.jpg




we can tell...

hai
04-02-2012, 07:32 PM
originally posted by apache http://catmacros.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/i_dont_even_cat.jpg

We can tell.

Apache
04-02-2012, 09:07 PM
We can tell.

lol...


otay xerox! when you have an original thought, let me know. :cold:

Retread
04-02-2012, 10:17 PM
lol...


okay xerox! when you have an original thought, let me know. :cold:

Since that will never happen, can we expect never to hear from him again?

Apache
04-02-2012, 10:37 PM
Since that will never happen, can we expect never to hear from him again?

yeah i'd say we probably will...:cold:




oh, and retread....http://www.sarcasticmyspace.com/graphics/blakkfrogg/comments121/pics_buckwheat-say-otay.jpg

:biggrin-new::biggrin-new:

NJCardFan
04-02-2012, 11:52 PM
I like the fact that I gave him a Constitutional smackdown and he completely blows it off. Typical liberal. And conservatives are generally unhappy? So I suppose all of those angry idiots in OWS are all conservatives? Who knew.

hai
04-03-2012, 11:47 PM
I like the fact that I gave him a Constitutional smackdown and he completely blows it off. Typical liberal. And conservatives are generally unhappy? So I suppose all of those angry idiots in OWS are all conservatives? Who knew.

Of course i find Liberals to be more accepting of people than Conservatives,because it seems with Conservatives it's like they only care about the status quo. While with Liberals,they seem to be like "whatever makes you happy,as long as it doesn't hurt anyone."

NJCardFan
04-04-2012, 02:09 AM
Of course i find Liberals to be more accepting of people than Conservatives,because it seems with Conservatives it's like they only care about the status quo. While with Liberals,they seem to be like "whatever makes you happy,as long as it doesn't hurt anyone."

I know you have brown eyes. How do I know? Because you're full of shit.

hai
04-04-2012, 02:28 AM
I know you have brown eyes. How do I know? Because you're full of shit.

No U!

Odysseus
04-04-2012, 08:54 AM
Of course i find Liberals to be more accepting of people than Conservatives,because it seems with Conservatives it's like they only care about the status quo. While with Liberals,they seem to be like "whatever makes you happy,as long as it doesn't hurt anyone."

You said that already. Liberals only feel that way about what goes on in the bedroom, but most of life goes on outside of it, and that's where liberals try to impose their will on everybody. Look at all of the things that liberals try to get rid of:


Incandescent light bulbs
Cutting trees on your own property
Nuclear power plants
Guns
SUVs
Coal mining
Oil Drilling
Happy Meals (says it all, doesn't it?)
Plastic bags
DDT
Firecrackers
Competitive sports for kids
Goldfish (San Francisco)


If something provides pleasure outside of the bedroom, security, or economic advantages, liberals hate it and want to regulate it out of existence.



No U!

Wow. You really are not running on all cylinders, are you? Seriously, you may want to consider finding another place to post. You're so far out of your league that you can't even see it.

hai
04-04-2012, 02:54 PM
You said that already. Liberals only feel that way about what goes on in the bedroom, but most of life goes on outside of it, and that's where liberals try to impose their will on everybody. Look at all of the things that liberals try to get rid of:


Incandescent light bulbs
Cutting trees on your own property
Nuclear power plants
Guns
SUVs
Coal mining
Oil Drilling
Happy Meals (says it all, doesn't it?)
Plastic bags
DDT
Firecrackers
Competitive sports for kids
Goldfish (San Francisco)


If something provides pleasure outside of the bedroom, security, or economic advantages, liberals hate it and want to regulate it out of existence.




Wow. You really are not running on all cylinders, are you? Seriously, you may want to consider finding another place to post. You're so far out of your league that you can't even see it.

Well it seems that Conservatives want to impose their morality on others and stuff,and i notice that Conservatives never seem to give to charities to fight diseases like AIDS and such,while Liberals seem to do.

Rockntractor
04-04-2012, 03:03 PM
Insert facepalm here!

Gentleman Pirate
04-04-2012, 03:07 PM
Well it seems that Conservatives want to impose their morality on others and stuff,and i notice that Conservatives never seem to give to charities to fight diseases like AIDS and such,while Liberals seem to do.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0

hai
04-04-2012, 03:07 PM
Insert facepalm here!

o.O

Zathras
04-04-2012, 05:39 PM
Well it seems that Conservatives want to impose their morality on others and stuff,and i notice that Conservatives never seem to give to charities to fight diseases like AIDS and such,while Liberals seem to do.

And when you come out of your drug addled stupor and do some research online you'll find out just how ignorant the above statement really is.

Odysseus
04-04-2012, 06:15 PM
Well it seems that Conservatives want to impose their morality on others and stuff,and i notice that Conservatives never seem to give to charities to fight diseases like AIDS and such,while Liberals seem to do.

Wow, the stupid is strong with you. First off, liberals are far more likely to want to impose their morality on others "and stuff" (Is English your first language?). Conservatives, for the most part, want to be left alone. It's liberals who insist on redefining society to meet their ends, and then accuse conservatives of legislating morality when they object. Look at abortion, for example. Some states had abortion laws that were pretty restrictive, some banned it outright, and some were basically without restrictions, but the people of Texas didn't go to New York and demand that they ban it. Abortion only became a national issue when the Supreme Court decided that the states couldn't govern themselves, and every state had to meet the standard of the most liberal states. It was the same with every other moral issue that has come down the pike.

As for not giving money to charities, the data proves you wrong.


Conservatives More Liberal Givers

By George Will

WASHINGTON -- Residents of Austin, Texas, home of the state's government and flagship university, have very refined social consciences, if they do say so themselves, and they do say so, speaking via bumper stickers. Don R. Willett, a justice of the state Supreme Court, has commuted behind bumpers proclaiming "Better a Bleeding Heart Than None at All," "Practice Random Acts of Kindness and Senseless Beauty," "The Moral High Ground Is Built on Compassion," "Arms Are For Hugging," "Will Work (When the Jobs Come Back From India)," "Jesus Is a Liberal," "God Wants Spiritual Fruits, Not Religious Nuts," "The Road to Hell Is Paved With Republicans," "Republicans Are People Too -- Mean, Selfish, Greedy People" and so on. But Willett thinks Austin subverts a stereotype: "The belief that liberals care more about the poor may scratch a partisan or ideological itch, but the facts are hostile witnesses."

Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at Syracuse University, published "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism." The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than conservatives.

If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:

-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).

-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.

-- Residents of the states that voted for John Kerry in 2004 gave smaller percentages of their incomes to charity than did residents of states that voted for George Bush.

-- Bush carried 24 of the 25 states where charitable giving was above average.

-- In the 10 reddest states, in which Bush got more than 60 percent majorities, the average percentage of personal income donated to charity was 3.5. Residents of the bluest states, which gave Bush less than 40 percent, donated just 1.9 percent.

-- People who reject the idea that "government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality" give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition.

Brooks demonstrates a correlation between charitable behavior and "the values that lie beneath" liberal and conservative labels. Two influences on charitable behavior are religion and attitudes about the proper role of government.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/printpage/?url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html





And, when it comes to charities that fight AIDS, specifically, let the record show that George W. Bush increased AIDS funding for Africa more than all of his predecessors combined.

You can admit that you're wrong any time now.

hai
04-04-2012, 07:19 PM
And when you come out of your drug addled stupor and do some research online you'll find out just how ignorant the above statement really is.

This coming from a person who lives in a state that legalized pot?:rolleyes:

I read that California legalized the drug.

Retread
04-04-2012, 09:08 PM
This coming from a person who lives in a state that legalized pot?:rolleyes:

I read that California legalized the drug.

http://images.kaneva.com/filestore/1290051/1885631/stone-wall.jpg

hai
04-04-2012, 09:10 PM
http://images.kaneva.com/filestore/1290051/1885631/stone-wall.jpg

What is this i don't even

Retread
04-04-2012, 09:21 PM
What is this i don't even

http://bothsides.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/haircut-dilution-285x300.jpg

hai
04-04-2012, 09:26 PM
http://bothsides.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/haircut-dilution-285x300.jpg

Dude,please explain in english what you're saying.

Retread
04-04-2012, 10:53 PM
s/he/it just ain't worth the effort..............

hai
04-04-2012, 11:48 PM
s/he/it just ain't worth the effort..............

What,you totally lost me o.O

Rockntractor
04-05-2012, 12:04 AM
What,you totally lost me o.O

http://i686.photobucket.com/albums/vv230/upyourstruly/oddball.jpg

hai
04-05-2012, 12:21 AM
http://i686.photobucket.com/albums/vv230/upyourstruly/oddball.jpg

My head hurts.

Zathras
04-05-2012, 03:40 AM
This coming from a person who lives in a state that legalized pot?:rolleyes:

I read that California legalized the drug.

Really? Then I should be able to go to the store and buy some right? The only thing they legalised here in California is pot for medicinal use only you dumbass.

Again, when you stop banging your head against the wall because you think it feels good and do some research you'll find out just how stupid you really are.

Odysseus
04-05-2012, 11:42 AM
My head hurts.

We know.

noonwitch
04-05-2012, 01:40 PM
I don't go to Free Republic but googled "you might be a liberal" and found this(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1523568/posts):

You are against the War on Terror, but are only too happy to make millions of dollars by making movies about it.

You preach about the evils of Capitalism from the comfort of your Beverly Hills estate

You cry about "profiterring corporations", but still demand your weekly paycheck.

You think "rich people" are evil, but are willing to over-look the fact that Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, George Soros, Michael Moore, and Al Franken are "rich", as well.

You scream and shout when innocent civilians are accidentally caught in the cross-fire, but remain silent when terrorists kill them on purpose

You think OJ Simpson is really looking for the "real killers"

You think claim a higher moral ground in opposing the death penalty, but celebrate killing of innocent un-born babies

You think America deserved 9/11

You think the troops are "war criminals", but a thug who killed somebody in cold blood is just a "victim of society"

You think you can give a dollar to somebody, without first having to take it from somebody elsed

You want to ban and outlaw legal gun ownership, yet the same time, you want to be allowed to have armed guards at your beck-and-call

You think Ted Kennedy knows how to manage your money, better than you do.

You think Saddam, Kim Jong Il, and Castro were fairly elected, but President Bush was not

You fail to see the connection between Lenin and Lennon

You think "tolerance" is reserved for those who share your opinions, views, and ideals

You think the name of God/Jesus should be banned and censored, except when spoken in profanity

You think it was wrong for Bush to use images of 9/11 in political ads, but saw nothing wrong with Kerry using flag-draped caskets in his ads.

You refuse to allow a child to carry a Bible to school, but demand that schools make special provisions to accommodate a non-Christian's religious beliefs.

You whine about religious leaders involvment in politics, but only when the Reverend's name is Robertson...not Jackson or Sharpton

You support radical Judges who interpret what they "think" the Constitution means, instead of what it actually says.

You think the meaning and definition of the Constitution should change, based on your own feelings or opinions.

You constantly cry about defense spending, but scream when bases in your areas are closed.

You think Greenpeace and the Earth Liberation Front burning down SUV dealerships or torching chemical plants "help" the enviroment.

You support low-income housing, until they start to build in your neighborhood.

You think the term "illegal alien" is a bad word

You think Michael Moore's films are "historically accurate"

You believe the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of federal funding

You believe that there was no art before Federal funding

You think the only thing wrong with the forged Rather Memo, was people refused to believe it.

You think girls should be allowed to go to an all-boy school, but not the other way around

You support welfare for illegal immigrants who don't pay taxes, anyway

You think Fox News distorts the truth, but Dan Rather reports "honest journalism".

You complain that we never give peace a chance

When asked about your favorite Marx Brother, the first one to come to mind is Karl.

You think NPR is the only really fair and balanced news source

You think race riots are acceptable

You think racial hatred is wrong, but "class hatred" is acceptable

You think that every misbehaving child has ADD and needs to be doped-up on Ritalin.

You think lawsuits that deny any personal responsibility on the part of the plantiff is justified.

You think the best way to deal with terrorist regimes is to please and appease them.

You are opposed to a military presence in Europe, unless it's to bail out France

You would rather defend Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Saddam and Castro before you defend the US

You think violent gun-crime would automatically disappear if honest citizens could not bear arms.

You constantly equate Conservatives to the likes of Hilter as your only defense

You believe 1 + 1 = 2, or 3, or 4...or whatever it takes to protect the child's self-esteem

You think that porn should be federally protected per Freedom of Speech, but public profession of Faith should be outlawed.

You applaud Jimmy Carter for talking about Human Rights, but screamed and shouted when President Bush actually did something about it.

You think we should have given Saddam 12 more years, and then 12 more on top of that, if he didn't comply by then

You think the UN should be the final authority, even in the U.S.

You think if a person makes more than $50,000/year, then he/she is cheating people and ripping them off.



As I support capitalism and like everyone else, dream of being rich myself someday, most of the things about money and the rich are not part of my liberal values, other than I do support a slightly higher income tax for those who make over $500,000 a year. If I made that much money, I wouldn't begrudge another 1-2% of my income going for taxes. I know that to a lot of conservatives, this makes me the equal to Marx and Lenin, though.

As far as "liberals believing America deserved 9-11", well, there are probably some stupid DUers who believe that literally, but that statement is just a conservative's analysis of what most liberals believe about the matter. Most of us believe that short-sighted foreign policies in the 80s helped lead to the rise of al-Queda and other radical terrorist groups in the middle east, including those who recieve funds/weapons from Iran, to whom the Reagan administration sold weapons in order to fund drug-dealing, nun-murdering "freedom fighters" in Central America.

I think Girl Scouts should remain girls-only and Boy Scouts should remain boys only, so I have no problem with all girl or all boy schools. I think it's weird that Camp Fire Girls dropped the Girls part and is now coed. I wonder what type of boy wants to join that instead of Boy Scouts. Some of the best catholic schools around Detroit are single gender programs. I do have problems with the "afro centered" schools that teach the "sun people, ice people" bullcrap.
I don't listen to NPR, never listened to Air America when it was on, and don't really watch the news all that much because whether it is liberal-biased or conservative-biased in it's content, it's all biased toward the sensational.

I have no problem with a public school student discussing his religious faith with his fellow students during lunch time or any other free time during the school day, regardless of what religion the child practices, as long as he is not disrupting class or offending other students in a way that equates to personal name-calling. I always thought my school district handled it well, for the most part.

Not all liberals have a lockstep position on each of these issuses-I'm not going to get into each one, I don't have time. The DU has their hive mind and all that, but they don't speak for all liberals.