PDA

View Full Version : John McCain, the 2008 Election, and Civil Unrest



Rockntractor
04-24-2012, 04:24 PM
April 21, 2012 - 6:48 am - by J. Christian Adams
There is an interesting story about the 2008 election coming out of Wikileaks. Memos from Stratfor released by Wikileaks say that widespread voter fraud occurred in Ohio and that “black Dems were caught stuffing the ballot boxes in Philly.” The McCain campaign knew about the fraud but feared taking action because of the “possibility of domestic violence” if they challenged the results in Pennsylvania and Ohio.

The memos say campaign staff urged candidate John McCain to act in court:

“Staff felt they could get a federal injunction to stop the process.”


One of the Wikileaked memos says: “Sen. McCain chose not to fight.” The reason?

The memo states:

“McCain felt the crowds assembled in support of Obama and such would be detrimental to our country and it would do our nation no good for this to drag out like last go around, coupled with the possibility of domestic violence.”

With the blessings of hindsight, we see that fear of mob violence in our country is no longer a hypothetical in the mind of a presidential candidate. The call by the New Black Panther Party in Sanford, Florida, to seize (or kill) a private citizen is no longer the stuff of a senator’s imagination.

Recall Philadelphia was where the entire New Black Panther Party controversy started on election night. Poll watcher Bartle Bull has opined that one purpose of the presence of the New Black Panthers was to intimidate poll watchers, the exact people trained to detect and memorialize polling place misbehavior. That’s another reason why the dismissal of the lawsuit by the Holder Justice Department, even before discovery took place to investigate the events in Philadelphia, was such a blow to the rule of law.

Read More>http://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2012/04/21/john-mccain-the-2008-election-and-civil-unrest/

Starbuck
04-24-2012, 11:52 PM
Interesting stuff.

It is ironic that the election of the first black president will be used by blacks to disenfranchise themselves even further. The actions of the polling place activists, the black panthers, and various spontaneous ad hoc groups will do great damage to us all.

And Obama himself is directly to blame. His selective criticism of anyone who confronts a black person ("Police acting stupidly"; "my son would look like him") has emboldened non-performers and scofflaws who evidently believe they can now "get even", and his front loading of his administration with poorly performing black people such as Eric Holder, Lisa Jackson, Van Jones and Valerie Jarrett has quietly been noticed by the silent majority.

I am very afraid of where this is all heading.

Janice
04-25-2012, 03:30 AM
Nice little summation there Starbuck. :cool:

Arroyo_Doble
04-25-2012, 09:48 AM
Even with Ohio and Pennsylvania, McCain would have lost.

What is the upside to contesting those two states' elections?

Rockntractor
04-25-2012, 09:55 AM
Even with Ohio and Pennsylvania, McCain would have lost.

What is the upside to contesting those two states' elections?

Legitimizing the voters in those states and making who they actually voted for count, protection of their rights according to the law and not mobs.

Arroyo_Doble
04-25-2012, 10:01 AM
Legitimizing the voters in those states and making who they actually voted for count, protection of their rights according to the law and not mobs.

Contest it, then. Never too late.

Rockntractor
04-25-2012, 10:34 AM
Contest it, then. Never too late.

It is now but it wasn't then moron, same goes for Frankenfurter, only a lib like you think laws should not matter.

BreslinBeal1990
04-25-2012, 05:40 PM
Even with Ohio and Pennsylvania, McCain would have lost.

What is the upside to contesting those two states' elections?


If it was happening in those states it's likely it occurred in others

txradioguy
04-26-2012, 06:14 AM
Even with Ohio and Pennsylvania, McCain would have lost.

What is the upside to contesting those two states' elections?

oooo I dunno...maybe making sure that vote fraud didn't go unpunished.

You know...basic stuff like that.

:rolleyes:

txradioguy
04-26-2012, 06:15 AM
If it was happening in those states it's likely it occurred in others

It did. And you'll have to excuse annoyo...he's an Obama fanboi who finds no fault in anything this Administration does.

NJCardFan
04-26-2012, 11:28 AM
oooo I dunno...maybe making sure that vote fraud didn't go unpunished.

You know...basic stuff like that.

:rolleyes:

As long as it's leftists and other assorted statists getting "elected" yo yo is fine with it. However, if a machine made an error and one vote for a Republican was double cast, the Democrat machine would start working double time to get the entire election declared illegitimate even if the election was as lopsided as 1984.

txradioguy
04-27-2012, 02:40 PM
As long as it's leftists and other assorted statists getting "elected" yo yo is fine with it. However, if a machine made an error and one vote for a Republican was double cast, the Democrat machine would start working double time to get the entire election declared illegitimate even if the election was as lopsided as 1984.

QFT