PDA

View Full Version : Half Of Detroit’s Streetlights May Go Out As City Shrinks



Gina
05-24-2012, 05:35 PM
Link (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-24/half-of-detroit-s-streetlights-may-go-out-as-city-shrinks.html)

Detroit, whose 139 square miles contain 60 percent fewer residents than in 1950, will try to nudge them into a smaller living space by eliminating almost half its streetlights.

As it is, 40 percent of the 88,000 streetlights are broken and the city, whose finances are to be overseen by an appointed board, can’t afford to fix them. Mayor Dave Bing’s plan would create an authority to borrow $160 million to upgrade and reduce the number of streetlights to 46,000. Maintenance would be contracted out, saving the city $10 million a year.

Other U.S. cities have gone partially dark to save money, among them Colorado Springs; Santa Rosa, California; and Rockford, Illinois. Detroit’s plan goes further: It would leave sparsely populated swaths unlit in a community of 713,000 that covers more area than Boston, Buffalo and San Francisco combined. Vacant property and parks account for 37 square miles (96 square kilometers), according to city planners.

“You have to identify those neighborhoods where you want to concentrate your population,” said Chris Brown, Detroit’s chief operating officer. “We’re not going to light distressed areas like we light other areas.
I remember going to Detroit to watch the Tigers when I was a kid. I have relatives in Birmingham. Things sure have changed.

Starbuck
05-24-2012, 06:46 PM
This is smart. Pull the plug and call in the bulldozers. Large vacant lots will hide no criminals.

Like Timbuktu, Detroit has been passed over by time. It will never become completely irrelevant the way Timbuktu has, but the principle is the same, I feel.

AmPat
05-24-2012, 07:12 PM
This is smart. Pull the plug and call in the bulldozers. Large vacant lots will hide no criminals.

Like Timbuktu, Detroit has been passed over by time. It will never become completely irrelevant the way Timbuktu has, but the principle is the same, I feel.

I agree. Then the Unions can come and spend the money for the diesel for the bulldozers.