PDA

View Full Version : Chinese official explains forced abortion policy funded by Obama administration



Gina
06-14-2012, 07:49 PM
Link (http://www.lifesitenews.com/blog/chinese-official-explains-forced-abortion-policy-funded-by-obama-administra)

In the video below, a “family planning” official with the government of Changsha City, in the Chinese province of Hunan, explains how she uses her friendly lieutenants to “persuade” women to have abortions when they exceed the country’s one-child limit. The interview with the official was done last Friday by Bob Fu of the Evangelical Protestant organization China Aid.


http://youtu.be/EYlW8rIMXpQ

The case Mr. Fu is calling about is that of Cao Ruyi, 37, and her husband Li Fu. The two already have a six year old daughter, and now Mrs. Cao is being told she must allow doctors to kill her “illegal baby” (yes, those are the words used by the official) or pay a fine equivalent to $24,000 (four years of wages for the couple) in order to spare his life. She is currently imprisoned at a hospital, where she is surrounded at all times by 10-20 men whose job it is to “persuade” her to have a “voluntary” abortion.


Such is China’s ruthless population control program, a program that is aided heavily by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), an agency that the Obama administration is funding to the tune of $50 million per year despite U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell’s statement in 2002 that “UNFPA’s support of, and involvement in, China’s population-planning activities allows the Chinese government to implement more effectively its program of coercive abortion.”

The UNFPA has always supported China’s bloody “one child policy” since its inception, providing millions of dollars in aid for various programs that support the policy and enable its baby-killing bureaucrats to do their dirty work. The agency has repeatedly deceived the public over the decades of its involvement, first by denying that forced abortions were happening, then claiming that it was mitigating the severity of the program through its soothing presence.

After the coercive nature of the one-child policy was firmly established as public knowledge, the UNFPA temporarily abandoned the program in 1994. But four years later it was back, claiming that it had an agreement with the Chinese government that no coercive tactics would be used in
areas of the country where the UNFPA was involved. Investigations by the U.S. State Department and the Population Research Institute in 2002 determined that the UNFPA was again acting deceptively, providing backup support for the one-child-policy and even sharing offices with the same officials who were carrying it out.

In the case of Changsha City, where Cao Ruyi and her husband are currently being “persuaded” to kill their unborn child by family planning officials, UNFPA’s own website confirms that the organization is carrying out joint “family planning” programs with those same officials.

Your tax dollars at work…
:frown-new:

Hubie
06-14-2012, 10:00 PM
Coming soon to America...

Starbuck
06-14-2012, 11:15 PM
Coming soon to America...

Jeez! What is that comment based on!?:rolleyes:

ThinkingBig
06-15-2012, 08:26 AM
Where do you did this shit up?

If you want to criticize Obama, why not just focus on his actual policies.

You know, reality.

This constant posting of b.s. propaganda makes you less credible, like you can't think or read for yourself.

Apache
06-15-2012, 11:59 AM
Where do you did this shit up?

If you want to criticize Obama, why not just focus on his actual policies.

You know, reality.

This constant posting of b.s. propaganda makes you less credible, like you can't think or read for yourself.

Hey! I got an idea! Why don't you post some links to prove that this is bullshit????


Your Leftist snark is really wearing thin... put up, or shut up.

Odysseus
06-15-2012, 02:17 PM
Where do you did this shit up?

If you want to criticize Obama, why not just focus on his actual policies.

You know, reality.

This constant posting of b.s. propaganda makes you less credible, like you can't think or read for yourself.

Okay, let's start by pointing out that Obama restored funding to the United Nations Population Fund Agency (UNPFA), which means that our tax dollars are funding this horror. Here's the documentation: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/24/us/politics/24obama.html

That means that this is his actual policy, since he made a deliberate, conscious descision to reverse the previous policy of not funding this agency.

Your turn.

wasp69
06-15-2012, 02:21 PM
Okay, let's start by pointing out that Obama restored funding to the United Nations Population Fund Agency (UNPFA), which means that our tax dollars are funding this horror. Here's the documentation: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/24/us/politics/24obama.html

That means that this is his actual policy, since he made a deliberate, conscious descision to reverse the previous policy of not funding this agency.

Your turn.

Is it just me, or does "Spicoli" strike anyone else as a relatively intelligent but impulsive, punkass 16 year old boy?

Odysseus
06-15-2012, 11:33 PM
Is it just me, or does "Spicoli" strike anyone else as a relatively intelligent but impulsive, punkass 16 year old boy?

Except for the relatively intelligent part, yes.

Gina
06-16-2012, 10:45 AM
Where do you did this shit up?

If you want to criticize Obama, why not just focus on his actual policies.

You know, reality.

This constant posting of b.s. propaganda makes you less credible, like you can't think or read for yourself.
Right back at you. This IS his policy, or are you incapable of accepting that lord Obama does anything wrong. Kudos on not calling me a racist this time though. That's progress. :rolleyes:

NJCardFan
06-16-2012, 11:54 AM
Except for the relatively intelligent part, yes.

Agreed here.

JB
06-18-2012, 07:42 PM
Okay, let's start by pointing out that Obama restored funding to the United Nations Population Fund Agency (UNPFA), which means that our tax dollars are funding this horror. Here's the documentation: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/24/us/politics/24obama.html

That means that this is his actual policy, since he made a deliberate, conscious descision to reverse the previous policy of not funding this agency.

Your turn.Kick

wasp69
06-18-2012, 09:57 PM
Except for the relatively intelligent part, yes.

Nah, I'll give him that much. He reminds me of my two oldest sons, not sure which one, though.

JB
06-19-2012, 07:56 PM
Okay, let's start by pointing out that Obama restored funding to the United Nations Population Fund Agency (UNPFA), which means that our tax dollars are funding this horror. Here's the documentation: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/24/us/politics/24obama.html

That means that this is his actual policy, since he made a deliberate, conscious descision to reverse the previous policy of not funding this agency.

Your turn.Where are we on this?

Odysseus
06-19-2012, 08:32 PM
Where are we on this?

Still no response from Spicoli.

Gina
06-20-2012, 02:24 AM
I doubt we'll hear from him, I mean the nerve of us asking him to accept Obama's horrible policies.

I don't think he knows how to comment twice on a thread, because he never does.

txradioguy
06-20-2012, 02:48 AM
So this is what America is getting in return for China loaning us money for Obama's slush fund?

:rolleyes:

JB
06-20-2012, 09:01 PM
I doubt we'll hear from him...I know and normally I don't give a crap what these hit and run libpukes think.

When they act like complete asses and don't back it up they need to be reminded of it. So I'll kick the thread for the guy again. He needs to do some 'splaining.

Rockntractor
06-20-2012, 09:14 PM
Looks like we have to do the same with Tinklingbig as we did with Wei, he needs to follow through with his posts.

ThinkingBig
06-20-2012, 09:58 PM
Looks like we have to do the same with Tinklingbig as we did with Wei, he needs to follow through with his posts.


What the fuck does this even mean?


Looks like we have to do the same with Tinklingbig as we did with Wei, he needs to follow through with his posts.

What post exactly didn't I follow through on? I don't have a free hour to go digging through post after post of thread that went full-retard right outta the gate. Arguing with wing nuts is futile.

You don't like my opinion, you don't like my point of view, fine. But you got people posting stories from every extreme right cleaning house conspiracy theory site on the net. If you only want members who agree with THAT point of view and buy into every bit GOP hyper-partisan propaganda, perhaps you should put that on the masthead. T'would save a lot of time.

There's freaking morons on this site who actually believe that because I don't hold the same extreme right positions as them, I'm a "libtard". Way to win over the moderates and independents, boys. With that kind of logic, Romney is a shoe-in!!:cool::roll eyes:


What's the definition of insanity?

Doing the same thing and expecting different results. We've replaced Dems with GOPs before. We gave the GOP the House, the Senate, AND the WH. How'd that work out? Did the "Hammer" fix DC or was it business as usual? W. had eight freaking years!! I'm not convinced Romney has all the answers, he's saying whatever it takes to hold the conservative base and bring in as many others as possible. He's a smart businessman and a moderate conservative, but so was baby Bush and Dicky. The executive branch doesn't write the tax code or allocate spending. How many Conservative Tea Party reps fed at the stimulus tough after voting no?

I'm a throw-ALL-the-bums out guy. You don't like that. Tough shit. The executive branch is not what's ruining our country. It doesn't matter who's in the WH as long as we have a broken congress. Insanity would be blindly replacing one Rep for another or one senator for another based solely on a political label and a commercial.

I've seen Dr. Paul mocked around here. Funny, the 'conservative' underground mocking the most conservative and straightforward honest of the GOP candidates.

Funny insane.

Rockntractor
06-20-2012, 10:11 PM
What the fuck does this even mean?




Okay, we can go that route. Learn some fucking respect, take three days off.

Gina
06-20-2012, 11:26 PM
I've seen Dr. Paul mocked around here. Funny, the 'conservative' underground mocking the most conservative and straightforward honest of the GOP candidates.

Funny insane.

Paul is a hypocrite just like most. He decries Social Security but draws it. Funny insane alright. :rolleyes:

Odysseus
06-21-2012, 02:21 PM
What the fuck does this even mean?

Wei is another leftist poster who throws out inane comments, and then refuses to back them up when they are refuted. He's also an out and out Marxist, by his own admission, so his comments tend to be a combination of Marxist analysis and campus leftism, but like most Marxists (including Marx), he cannot explain exactly how the fantasies of a workers' paradise will come about, so when he gets called on this, he disappears. You may or may not share his politics, but you are using the same tactics. Now, you know what it means.


What post exactly didn't I follow through on? I don't have a free hour to go digging through post after post of thread that went full-retard right outta the gate. Arguing with wing nuts is futile.

Yes, but since you are making the arguments, and are a wing nut, what I do with my time is my business.


You don't like my opinion, you don't like my point of view, fine. But you got people posting stories from every extreme right cleaning house conspiracy theory site on the net. If you only want members who agree with THAT point of view and buy into every bit GOP hyper-partisan propaganda, perhaps you should put that on the masthead. T'would save a lot of time.

There's freaking morons on this site who actually believe that because I don't hold the same extreme right positions as them, I'm a "libtard". Way to win over the moderates and independents, boys. With that kind of logic, Romney is a shoe-in!!:cool::roll eyes:


What's the definition of insanity?

Doing the same thing and expecting different results. We've replaced Dems with GOPs before. We gave the GOP the House, the Senate, AND the WH. How'd that work out? Did the "Hammer" fix DC or was it business as usual? W. had eight freaking years!! I'm not convinced Romney has all the answers, he's saying whatever it takes to hold the conservative base and bring in as many others as possible. He's a smart businessman and a moderate conservative, but so was baby Bush and Dicky. The executive branch doesn't write the tax code or allocate spending. How many Conservative Tea Party reps fed at the stimulus tough after voting no?

I'm a throw-ALL-the-bums out guy. You don't like that. Tough shit. The executive branch is not what's ruining our country. It doesn't matter who's in the WH as long as we have a broken congress. Insanity would be blindly replacing one Rep for another or one senator for another based solely on a political label and a commercial.

I've seen Dr. Paul mocked around here. Funny, the 'conservative' underground mocking the most conservative and straightforward honest of the GOP candidates.

Funny insane.

You claimed that the Chinese one-child policy wasn't a policy of Obama's. I countered this with the documentation that showed that Obama had restored funding to the UN agency that facilitates this policy, which makes it his policy. You disappeared after that refutation. When you are proven wrong, you need to either own up to it or defend your position. You do neither. If you want to argue that Obama doesn't support the policy, then provide proof. If you want to admit that you were wrong, then do so. But either way, you need back up your arguments with more than just profanity-laced tirades and pathetic links to leftist sites.

Gina
06-22-2012, 03:30 AM
Okay, we can go that route. Learn some fucking respect, take three days off.

In case anyone missed it. :love_heart:

Odysseus
06-22-2012, 04:42 PM
In case anyone missed it. :love_heart:

I'm sure that he will lurk during his time out, and I wanted him to know that we aren't letting him off the hook.

Retread
06-22-2012, 10:21 PM
I'm sure that he will lurk during his time out, and I wanted him to know that we aren't letting him off the hook.

If we're lucky he'll just get PO'd and leave.