Should an animal abuser be president?

[Carol]

link (http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002848472)


Fearless (10,457 posts)

Should an animal abuser be president?


*picture of Romney sitting on a horse with the word "neigh" and then the words DogsAgainstRomney.com (horse division) under it.

I guess that Obama and liberals think Obama wins with this issue since Obama ate the dog, therefore the dog doesn't have a say in the matter.

[JB]

I really hope they go down this road.

Liberals are too stupid for their own good.

[Rockntractor]

http://www.smiley-lol.com/smiley/musique/siffleur.gif

[Apache]

http://www.smiley-lol.com/smiley/musique/siffleur.gifHeh!


I know what you mean :friendly_wink:

[Carol]

obliviously (1,437 posts)

3. It depends

I don't think a sitting president should be removed just for eating a dog.


nolabear (8,976 posts)

4. Fasle equivalence.

But you know that. Yep, there's that stunning liberal logic. Putting a dog in a dog carrier and strapping it to the roof of a car.....animal abuser who shouldn't be president.

Eating a dog......A OK, no problem.

[Hubie]

Yep, there's that stunning liberal logic. Putting a dog in a dog carrier and strapping it to the roof of a car.....animal abuser who shouldn't be president.

Eating a dog......A OK, no problem.

Logic fail. How do those people remember to breathe?

[Madisonian]

Logic fail. How do those people remember to breathe?

Air is free and if they remember anything, its free stuff.

[Odysseus]

Yep, there's that stunning liberal logic. Putting a dog in a dog carrier and strapping it to the roof of a car.....animal abuser who shouldn't be president.

Eating a dog......A OK, no problem.

It's a man-eat-dog world.