PDA

View Full Version : Bush's America: 100% Al-Qaeda Free Since 2001



patriot45
06-12-2008, 02:18 PM
Hey, give it up for Ann!!!

Take that! (http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/AnnCoulter/2008/06/11/bushs_america_100_al-qaeda_free_since_2001)


In a conversation recently, I mentioned as an aside what a great president George Bush has been and my friend was surprised. I was surprised that he was surprised.

I generally don't write columns about the manifestly obvious, but, yes, the man responsible for keeping Americans safe from another terrorist attack on American soil for nearly seven years now will go down in history as one of America's greatest presidents.

Produce one person who believed, on Sept. 12, 2001, that there would not be another attack for seven years, and I'll consider downgrading Bush from "Great" to "Really Good."

Merely taking out Saddam Hussein and his winsome sons Uday and Qusay (Hussein family slogan: "We're the Rape Room People!") constitutes a greater humanitarian accomplishment than anything Bill Clinton ever did -- and I'm including remembering Monica's name on the sixth sexual encounter.

But unlike liberals, who are so anxious to send American troops to Rwanda or Darfur, Republicans oppose deploying U.S. troops for purely humanitarian purposes. We invaded Iraq to protect America.

It is unquestionable that Bush has made this country safe by keeping Islamic lunatics pinned down fighting our troops in Iraq. In the past few years, our brave troops have killed more than 20,000 al-Qaida and other Islamic militants in Iraq alone. That's 20,000 terrorists who will never board a plane headed for JFK -- or a landmark building, for that matter.

We are, in fact, fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them at, say, the corner of 72nd and Columbus in Manhattan -- the mere mention of which never fails to enrage liberals, which is why you should say it as often as possible.

The Iraq war has been a stunning success. The Iraqi army is "standing up" (as they say), fat Muqtada al-Sadr --the Dr. Phil of Islamofascist radicalism -- has waddled off in retreat to Iran, and Sadr City and Basra are no longer war zones. Our servicemen must be baffled by the constant nay-saying coming from their own country.

The Iraqis have a democracy -- a miracle on the order of flush toilets in that godforsaken region of the world. Despite its newness, Iraq's democracy appears to be no more dysfunctional than one that would condemn a man who has kept the nation safe for seven years while deifying a man who has accomplished absolutely nothing in his entire life except to give speeches about "change."

(Guess what Bill Clinton's campaign theme was in 1992? You are wrong if you guessed: "bringing dignity back to the White House." It was "change." In January 1992, James Carville told Steve Daley of The Chicago Tribune that it had gotten to the point that the press was complaining about Clinton's "constant talk of change.")

Monthly casualties in Iraq now come in slightly lower than a weekend with Anna Nicole Smith. According to a CNN report last week, for the entire month of May, there were only 19 troop deaths in Iraq. (Last year, five people on average were shot every day in Chicago.) With Iraqi deaths at an all-time low, Iraq is safer than Detroit -- although the Middle Eastern food is still better in Detroit.

noonwitch
06-12-2008, 02:23 PM
Well, I have to admit I agree with Ann about one thing-the greatness of middle eastern food in Detroit!

patriot45
06-12-2008, 02:33 PM
We surely haven't been attacked here at home sine 9/11 either.

Nathan S.
06-12-2008, 02:45 PM
How come I can never say things as succinctly as her? :) She rounds it up pretty good. Of course, I'd get hit a lot more if I said it that way too. Maybe it's worth it?

Molon Labe
06-12-2008, 03:49 PM
I have my doubts that another terror attack hasn't occurred yet because of what the Bush administration has put into place. There were a whole lot of people who weren't "asleep at the wheel" in the intelligence community prior to 9-11, who understood Al Qaeda. But not everyone listens - including the Clinton's and even some in the early days of Bush's administration. I'll give more credit to Bush because he was only in office less than 9 months when the attacks occurred, but there was ample evidence of a threat. But you won't hear much about those dissenting voices in the MSM.

patriot45
06-12-2008, 04:18 PM
Keeping them on the run over there seems like it has stopped another attack here. I, like many people I have talked to, all thought for sure they would not stop after the towers, something has worked.