PDA

View Full Version : Defense Contractor caught bribing Military Officer



marinejcksn
11-07-2008, 11:55 PM
Defense Contractor and a Former Manager Charged in Conspiracy to Bribe a Military Contracting Officer in Iraq (http://http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2008/January/08_at_070.html)

WASHINGTON — A federal grand jury in Oklahoma City returned an indictment against a U.S. Department of Defense contractor and one of its former managers for conspiring to bribe a military contracting officer in Iraq, the Department of Justice announced today. The indictment was returned on Jan. 22, 2008, and was unsealed today against Elie Samir Chidiac, a U.S. citizen, and Raman International Inc. of Cypress, Texas, which does business as Raman Corporation. Chidiac appeared in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma today after having been arrested in Oklahoma City on Friday, Jan. 25, 2008.

Raman is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit bribery, and Chidiac is charged with two counts of conspiracy to commit bribery. Both are charged with participating in a scheme to steer Defense contracts to themselves. Chidiac is also charged with participating in a scheme with a co-conspirator military officer to alter contracting documents to allow Chidiac to fraudulently obtain payment for work not performed, which he then split with the officer.

According to the indictment, Chidiac and Raman Corporation gave money and other things of value, including a Harley Davidson motorcycle, to a military contracting officer in return for the award of U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) contracts worth hundreds of thousands of dollars at Camp Victory, Iraq.

“We will aggressively prosecute those who commit fraud involving goods and services destined for our military service personnel,” said Thomas O. Barnett, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department’s Antitrust Division.

Chidiac is charged in the indictment with conspiring to commit bribery by giving money to an unidentified military contracting officer in Iraq in return for that officer’s aid in perpetrating fraud on the United States. With respect to that charge, the indictment states that, among other things:

An unidentified military contracting officer canceled contracts that were already awarded to, and often had been performed by, third-party contractors;

The unidentified military contracting officer re-awarded those contracts to Raman and fraudulently verified that Raman had performed the requisite service or delivered the requisite goods;

Chidiac and the unidentified military contracting officer forged various contracting documents and fraudulently modified the military contracting database in order to create the appearance of propriety with respect to these canceled and re-awarded contracts;

The unidentified military contracting officer authorized Chidiac to receive cash payment on those contracts, which Chidiac did, despite the fact that neither Chidiac nor Raman performed any work, provided any service, or delivered any good with respect to these contracts;

Upon receipt of cash payment from the United States, typically in U.S. $100 bills, Chidiac remitted a portion of the money back to the unidentified military contracting officer, often delivering the money to the officer at Raman’s compound, adjacent to Camp Victory; and

The unidentified military contracting officer sent money received from Chidiac via U.S. Postal Service to a family member in Midwest City, Okla.

A violation of the conspiracy statute carries a maximum sentence of five years imprisonment and a fine of $250,000 for an individual and a fine of $500,000 for a corporation. The fines could be increased to twice the gain from the offense or twice the loss incurred by the victims of the crime.

“It’s critical for everyone to know that if they work with or for the U.S. Army and are considering defrauding the government we have mechanisms and personnel in place to defeat and fully investigate fraud,” said Brigadier General Rodney Johnson, the commanding general of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command. “This type of illegal activity, no matter what the extent, will not be tolerated and violators will be brought to justice.”

Today’s charges are examples of the Department’s commitment to protect U.S. taxpayers from procurement fraud through its creation of the National Procurement Fraud Task Force. The National Procurement Fraud Initiative announced in October 2006 is designed to promote the early detection, investigation, and prosecution of procurement fraud associated with the increase in contracting activity for national security and other government programs.

marinejcksn
11-08-2008, 12:08 AM
I post this story for the following reason:

The company caught making the brides caught my eye. I'm a Logistics man by trade; as such I deal in supply issues and ordering things for my unit. We deal with this "Raman Corporation" all the time. They're extremely unprofessional, deliver piss-poor equipment (which arrives broken half the time) and always quote an item 1 & 1/2 to 2 times the cost of what I could purchase it for online. For example:

We recently needed to buy an internal data storage to maintain our Maintenance records. The online order price through a respectable, AMERICAN electronics company lists the cost at $605.72, plus 100 dollars shipping, for a total of $705.72.

Raman Corp charged us 1043.00 plus 111.00 in shipping for a grand total of 1153 bucks.

When I acknowledged this to Superiors involved in the Chain of Command, the response was that we had to deal with Iraqi companies, not cheaper American companies so we can stimulate and help the Iraqi economy.

But one question: Didn't the above story say Raman Corp is based in TEXAS?

That's right folks, the US Government (which I'm sworn to defend) pisses away OUR tax dollars continuing to fund a company that's been PROVEN to be fraudulent, greedy and disgusting.

I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this any more. :mad: