View Full Version : Even Cindy McCain doesn't trust John, otherwise their would be no prenup.
Kimberly
06-18-2008, 08:27 PM
Low count poster thinks he's got a scandal (Even Cindy McCain doesn't trust John, otherwise their would be no prenup.)
MattP (423 posts) Wed Jun-18-08 07:39 PM
Original message
Even Cindy McCain doesn't trust John, otherwise their would be no prenup.
Advertisements [?]In her ABC interview tomorrow Cindy attacks Michelle over her the proud comment and says she trusts her Husband with our country's safety more but I guess her money is more important.
But then, maybe not.
juajen (1000+ posts) Wed Jun-18-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. You do remember that Teresa Heinz Kerry required a prenup
before she married John, don't you?
Haaahahaha!
megimoo
06-18-2008, 08:34 PM
Low count poster thinks he's got a scandal (Even Cindy McCain doesn't trust John, otherwise their would be no prenup.)
But then, maybe not.
Haaahahaha!If you have that kind of money and are without a pre-nupt.You are out of your mind.
juajen (1000+ posts) Wed Jun-18-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. You do remember that Teresa Heinz Kerry required a prenup
before she married John, don't you?
Oh Snap !!
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/119/294168009_b25decaddf.jpg
SaintLouieWoman
06-18-2008, 10:53 PM
Low count poster thinks he's got a scandal (http://Even Cindy McCain doesn't trust John, otherwise their would be no prenup.)
But then, maybe not.
Haaahahaha!If you have that kind of money and are without a pre-nupt.You are out of your mind.
Exactly. With her money, she'd be a fool to not have one. Look how much it cost Paul McCartney to be so trusting.
[quote=megimoo;10014]
Exactly. With her money, she'd be a fool to not have one. Look how much it cost Paul McCartney to be so trusting.
Actually Sir Paul did have a prenup. The greedy wench tried an end run around it to get more and ended up with less.
As far as the prenups with Cindy & Terresa because of their financial holdings the prenup would be more of a protection of shareholder interests than lack of faith in a spouse. Also has tax implications involved, separate property in community property states.
linda22003
06-19-2008, 07:50 AM
As far as the prenups with Cindy & Terresa because of their financial holdings the prenup would be more of a protection of shareholder interests than lack of faith in a spouse. Also has tax implications involved, separate property in community property states.
Quite true. This is way beyond "I trust him/I don't trust him". This is not a question of romance.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.