PDA

View Full Version : Even Cindy McCain doesn't trust John, otherwise their would be no prenup.



Kimberly
06-18-2008, 08:27 PM
Low count poster thinks he's got a scandal (Even Cindy McCain doesn't trust John, otherwise their would be no prenup.)


MattP (423 posts) Wed Jun-18-08 07:39 PM
Original message
Even Cindy McCain doesn't trust John, otherwise their would be no prenup.
Advertisements [?]In her ABC interview tomorrow Cindy attacks Michelle over her the proud comment and says she trusts her Husband with our country's safety more but I guess her money is more important.

But then, maybe not.


juajen (1000+ posts) Wed Jun-18-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. You do remember that Teresa Heinz Kerry required a prenup
before she married John, don't you?

Haaahahaha!

megimoo
06-18-2008, 08:34 PM
Low count poster thinks he's got a scandal (Even Cindy McCain doesn't trust John, otherwise their would be no prenup.)



But then, maybe not.



Haaahahaha!If you have that kind of money and are without a pre-nupt.You are out of your mind.

BSR
06-18-2008, 08:35 PM
juajen (1000+ posts) Wed Jun-18-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. You do remember that Teresa Heinz Kerry required a prenup
before she married John, don't you?

Oh Snap !!

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/119/294168009_b25decaddf.jpg

SaintLouieWoman
06-18-2008, 10:53 PM
Low count poster thinks he's got a scandal (http://Even Cindy McCain doesn't trust John, otherwise their would be no prenup.)



But then, maybe not.



Haaahahaha!If you have that kind of money and are without a pre-nupt.You are out of your mind.

Exactly. With her money, she'd be a fool to not have one. Look how much it cost Paul McCartney to be so trusting.

Zeus
06-19-2008, 12:25 AM
[quote=megimoo;10014]

Exactly. With her money, she'd be a fool to not have one. Look how much it cost Paul McCartney to be so trusting.

Actually Sir Paul did have a prenup. The greedy wench tried an end run around it to get more and ended up with less.

As far as the prenups with Cindy & Terresa because of their financial holdings the prenup would be more of a protection of shareholder interests than lack of faith in a spouse. Also has tax implications involved, separate property in community property states.

linda22003
06-19-2008, 07:50 AM
As far as the prenups with Cindy & Terresa because of their financial holdings the prenup would be more of a protection of shareholder interests than lack of faith in a spouse. Also has tax implications involved, separate property in community property states.

Quite true. This is way beyond "I trust him/I don't trust him". This is not a question of romance.