PDA

View Full Version : The Chinese faked their spacewalk



Cosmored
12-17-2008, 01:59 PM
It looks like the Chinese faked their space walk in a water tank.

http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=NVbBFwdmldA

Lars1701a
12-17-2008, 02:17 PM
Oh my God can you please go peddle your crazy shit somewhere else? we are all stocked up here.

I just cant believe someone is as crazy as you and still can walk the streets.

Zathras
12-17-2008, 02:19 PM
It looks like the Chinese faked their space walk in a water tank.

http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=NVbBFwdmldA

And nobody here cares about anything you have to say. Go away Cosmoron.

Cosmored
12-17-2008, 02:24 PM
Oh my God can you please go peddle your crazy shit somewhere else? we are all stocked up here.

I just cant believe someone is as crazy as you and still can walk the streets.
What you're supposed to do is explain why the evidence presented is wrong.

Look at the 10 second segment starting at the 6:47 time mark in this video.
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM

The safety cables are buoyant; they want to float up. This footage was taken in a water tank.

Sonnabend
12-17-2008, 02:26 PM
What you're supposed to do is explain why the evidence presented is wrong.

What we're supposed to do is whatever we want.


Look at the 10 second segment starting at the 6:47 time mark in this video.

You go look at it. I'm looking at the latest bikini contest from Brazil.

wilbur
12-17-2008, 02:26 PM
What you're supposed to do is explain why the evidence presented is wrong.

Look at the 10 second segment starting at the 6:47 time mark in this video.
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM

The safety cables are buoyant; they want to float up. This footage was taken in a water tank.

As far as government conspiracies go.... faking a spacewalk or even a moon landing is pretty benign... and not worth the energy you guys pour into it.

Who the hell cares?

linda22003
12-17-2008, 02:27 PM
What you're supposed to do is explain why the evidence presented is wrong.


I think I see the disconnect here. We're only "supposed" to do that if we find the topic interesting rather than insane.

biccat
12-17-2008, 02:34 PM
This does make me wonder, did the Soviets fake sending Yuri Gagarin into space?

Was the Challenger explosion a clever ploy by the US government to prove the dangers of space travel to the Soviets?

Did the space shuttle Columbia really explode from a suicide bomber, instead of faulty insulation?

Sonnabend
12-17-2008, 02:35 PM
I think I see the disconnect here. We're only "supposed" to do that if we find the topic interesting rather than insane.

Lemme see here,...girls in skimpy bikinis or a Cosmored crap video..

Gee, that's a tough choice....:D:D

enslaved1
12-17-2008, 02:36 PM
Ok, they faked the little girl singing at the Olympics, they faked the initial reports from the astronauts after lift off, why on earth would we be shocked if they faked a spacewalk?



And nobody here cares about anything you have to say. Go away Cosmoron.

We don't care, we just need to vent. :D

Sonnabend
12-17-2008, 02:38 PM
Was the Challenger explosion a clever ploy by the US government to prove the dangers of space travel to the Soviets?

Did the space shuttle Columbia really explode from a suicide bomber, instead of faulty insulation?

What was the best thing before sliced bread?

When you close the refrigerator door, does the light go out?

Why is it that a bird can fly, but a fly cant bird?

When you turn the light out, where does the light go?

Cosmored
12-17-2008, 02:38 PM
As far as government conspiracies go.... faking a spacewalk or even a moon landing is pretty benign... and not worth the energy you guys pour into it.

Who the hell cares?
If people realize that the Apollo moon missions were faked, they'll wake up the the fact that the government lies to the people on a regular basis.
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showthread.php?t=9002

Maybe they'll be more objective about the idea that 9/11 was an inside job and maybe wake up.

http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8989407671184881047

http://video.google.es/videosearch?hl=en&q=terror%20storm&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wv#

PoliCon
12-17-2008, 02:40 PM
If people realize that the Apollo moon missions were faked, they'll wake up the the fact that the government lies to the people on a regular basis.
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showthread.php?t=9002

Maybe they'll be more objective about the idea that 9/11 was an inside job and maybe wake up.

http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8989407671184881047

http://video.google.es/videosearch?hl=en&q=terror%20storm&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wv#

another 9/11 truther. Don't these guys get banned on sight? If not - they should.

linda22003
12-17-2008, 02:41 PM
another 9/11 truther. Don't these guys get banned on sight? If not - they should.

And now, along with Truthers, we have Birthers. :D

Sonnabend
12-17-2008, 02:42 PM
Maybe they'll be more objective about the idea that 9/11 was an inside job and maybe wake up.

http://zapatopi.net/afdb/afdbhead.jpg

The Night Owl
12-17-2008, 02:42 PM
If people realize that the Apollo moon missions were faked, they'll wake up the the fact that the government lies to the people on a regular basis.



If the Apollo missions were faked then who put mirrors on the moon?

biccat
12-17-2008, 02:43 PM
If people realize that the Apollo moon missions were faked, they'll wake up the the fact that the government lies to the people on a regular basis.

Why aren't you answering my questions? Did the Soviets lie about Gagarin? Did the US government cover up foreign acts of war against our space vehicles?

Zathras
12-17-2008, 02:44 PM
Lemme see here,...girls in skimpy bikinis or a Cosmored crap video..

Gee, that's a tough choice....:D:D

You realise this post is worthless without pictures Sonna.

patriot45
12-17-2008, 02:47 PM
He has a point! I did some research and it seems the first trp to the moon was actually in the 40s!!!!






http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHZv-evF26I

Zathras
12-17-2008, 02:48 PM
What was the best thing before sliced bread?

When you close the refrigerator door, does the light go out?

Why is it that a bird can fly, but a fly cant bird?

When you turn the light out, where does the light go?

And the most important question of all...

Does your chewing gum lose its flavor on the bedpost overnight?

PoliCon
12-17-2008, 02:49 PM
He has a point! I did some research and it seems the first trp to the moon was actually in the 40s!!!!






http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHZv-evF26I
Marvin is the BEST looneytoons character EVER!!

Cosmored
12-17-2008, 02:50 PM
If the Apollo missions were faked then who put mirrors on the moon?
Unmanned robotic craft that had mirrors attached to their sides could have been soft-landed. Those mirrors are not proof that there were people on the moon.


Why aren't you answering my questions? Did the Soviets lie about Gagarin? Did the US government cover up foreign acts of war against our space vehicles?
I thought you were just being sarcastic. I don't know the answers to those questions. In the documentary "What Happened on the Moon" they talk about Gagarin. I don't remember what was said.

Zathras
12-17-2008, 02:51 PM
If people realize that the Apollo moon missions were faked, they'll wake up the the fact that the government lies to the people on a regular basis.
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showthread.php?t=9002

Maybe they'll be more objective about the idea that 9/11 was an inside job and maybe wake up.

http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8989407671184881047

http://video.google.es/videosearch?hl=en&q=terror%20storm&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wv#

And when people realise that "shit happens" maybe the intelligent quotient of the US will come back to the level it was before these "truthers" (god, what an oximoron) reared their ignorant heads.

Cosmored
12-17-2008, 02:56 PM
And when people realise that "shit happens" maybe the intelligent quotient of the US will come back to the level it was before these "truthers" (god, what an oximoron) reared their ignorant heads.
You don't analyze evidence. You just spout insults.

Look at the picture of the nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg

That ain't the nose of a 757.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Boeing_757-256_-_Iberia_-_EC-HIS_-_LEMD_-_200503051655.jpg

biccat
12-17-2008, 03:00 PM
I thought you were just being sarcastic. I don't know the answers to those questions. In the documentary "What Happened on the Moon" they talk about Gagarin. I don't remember what was said.
Well if you're not going to give my unfounded assertions and vague references regarding proof any weight, I don't see why yours deserve any better.

FlaGator
12-17-2008, 03:03 PM
Deja vous. Wasn't this discussed a month or two ago? Next thing you know the OP will be bringing up Kooktrails.

FlaGator
12-17-2008, 03:04 PM
You don't analyze evidence. You just spout insults.

Look at the picture of the nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg

That ain't the nose of a 757.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Boeing_757-256_-_Iberia_-_EC-HIS_-_LEMD_-_200503051655.jpg

Looks kind of like Jimmy Durante's

Cosmored
12-17-2008, 03:05 PM
You people are either suffering from cognitive dissonance, or you just aren't equipped to deal with these subjects.

http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/dissonance.htm

linda22003
12-17-2008, 03:09 PM
You people are either suffering from cognitive dissonance, or you just aren't equipped to deal with these subjects.

Or we just think you're a goofball. I'd give THAT option some serious consideration.

Zathras
12-17-2008, 03:32 PM
You don't analyze evidence. You just spout insults.

Your "evidence" is an insult so I treat it as such.


Look at the picture of the nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg

That ain't the nose of a 757.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Boeing_757-256_-_Iberia_-_EC-HIS_-_LEMD_-_200503051655.jpg

Wow, so tell us, oh moronic one. If it's not a 757, what is it that eye witnesses saw hitting the Pentagon that day? And while you're at it tell us where the aircraft that supposedly didn't hit the Pentagon is? Her crew? The passengers? I'm sure the families of them would love to know.

linda22003
12-17-2008, 03:34 PM
Wow, so tell us, oh moronic one. If it's not a 757, what is it that eye witnesses saw hitting the Pentagon that day? And while you're at it tell us where the aircraft that supposedly didn't hit the Pentagon is? Her crew? The passengers? I'm sure the families of them would love to know.

While he's at it, he can explain why a colleague of mine, the Pentagon librarian, wrote a disaster recovery article on what it's like to have to get a landing gear out of your Reference Section. :(

Zathras
12-17-2008, 03:34 PM
You people are either suffering from cognitive dissonance, or you just aren't equipped to deal with these subjects.

http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/dissonance.htm

Oh, we're equiped to deal with these subjects. It's called laughing our colective asses off at morons like you who put forward such stupidity.

Zathras
12-17-2008, 03:36 PM
While he's at it, he can explain why a colleague of mine, the Pentagon librarian, wrote a disaster recovery article on what it's like to have to get a landing gear out of your Reference Section. :(

Oh, he'll probably say they're lying or were paid off to say what the government wants. Some BS like that.

So...when is this thread going to moved to where it belongs? Into the forum it deserves to be in...Stupid Liberal Tricks. And can we restrict Cosmoron to just that forum so as not to pollute the others with his stupidity?

linda22003
12-17-2008, 03:37 PM
Oh, he'll probably say they're lying or were paid off to say what the government wants. Some BS like that.

You're right. And yet, she was there. I'll bet he wasn't.

Zathras
12-17-2008, 03:39 PM
You're right. And yet, she was there. I'll bet he wasn't.

Just like with every other thing that did happen and he says didn't.

enslaved1
12-17-2008, 04:08 PM
You people are either suffering from cognitive dissonance, or you just aren't equipped to deal with these subjects.

http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/dissonance.htm

You are absolutely correct, we are not equipped to deal with these subjects because we lack a cranial cavity full of bovine fecal matter.

Get over it dude. The earth is round, man has walked on the moon, a small group of determined extremists hijacked and flew commercial airliners into the WTC and Pentagon, and the world is not run by the Freemasons, Illuminate, or the jews.

The Night Owl
12-17-2008, 05:41 PM
Unmanned robotic craft that had mirrors attached to their sides could have been soft-landed. Those mirrors are not proof that there were people on the moon.

So, let me get this straight...

In the 1960s and 1970s we could land robots on the moon and have them deploy mirrors but we couldn't land a man there?

:rolleyes:

ironhorsedriver
12-17-2008, 06:02 PM
Your "evidence" is an insult so I treat it as such.



Wow, so tell us, oh moronic one. If it's not a 757, what is it that eye witnesses saw hitting the Pentagon that day? And while you're at it tell us where the aircraft that supposedly didn't hit the Pentagon is? Her crew? The passengers? I'm sure the families of them would love to know.

It was that missing Navy flight of Avengers that was lost in the Bermuda Triangle. They have been in the air since the 1940's, they where getting a little low on fuel.

Zathras
12-17-2008, 06:22 PM
It was that missing Navy flight of Avengers that was lost in the Bermuda Triangle. They have been in the air since the 1940's, they where getting a little low on fuel.

It can't be them. They found those back in 1977 in the Mexican dessert.

ralph wiggum
12-17-2008, 06:26 PM
It can't be them. They found those back in 1977 in the Mexican dessert.

What kind of dessert was it? :D :D

FlaGator
12-17-2008, 07:03 PM
What kind of dessert was it? :D :D

A mexican dessert. Taco ala mo

asdf2231
12-17-2008, 07:24 PM
What you're supposed to do is explain why the evidence presented is wrong.

The safety cables are buoyant; they want to float up. This footage was taken in a water tank.

It was posted by a fucking retard?

Mythic
12-17-2008, 07:36 PM
Hey comsored, I would love to have an intelligent debate with you. (well, on my part anyway). But your "evidence" is just a ton of videos and pictures you found. You never actual analyze any of it. So how about you actual post some arguments not just videos.

SarasotaRepub
12-17-2008, 09:19 PM
So, let me get this straight...

In the 1960s and 1970s we could land robots on the moon and have them deploy mirrors but we couldn't land a man there?

:rolleyes:


OMG, even TNO is making fun of you. :eek::D

Oh...and you're a day late and a few bucks short, we already have a thread about the ChiCom spacewalk a few weeks ago.

Sonnabend
12-18-2008, 02:40 AM
Ask and ye shall receive

http://tips.webdesign10.com/files/flavia.jpg

Zathras
12-18-2008, 03:32 AM
Ask and ye shall receive

http://tips.webdesign10.com/files/flavia.jpg

Hmmm...what, did you say something?

Lars1701a
12-18-2008, 03:53 AM
Ask and ye shall receive

http://tips.webdesign10.com/files/flavia.jpg

me likey :)

Moon
12-18-2008, 06:13 AM
What you're supposed to do is explain why the evidence presented is wrong.

Look at the 10 second segment starting at the 6:47 time mark in this video.
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=gMxQEHfU6hM

The safety cables are buoyant; they want to float up. This footage was taken in a water tank.

Think about the bolded statement for just a moment...

Cosmored
12-18-2008, 11:27 AM
Wow, so tell us, oh moronic one. If it's not a 757, what is it that eye witnesses saw hitting the Pentagon that day? And while you're at it tell us where the aircraft that supposedly didn't hit the Pentagon is? Her crew? The passengers? I'm sure the families of them would love to know.
The evidence shows that it wasn't a 757 so there are lots of plausible scenarios. We just can't be sure which one reflects reality.

In this link there's a documentary called "Painful Deceptions".
http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm

A theory that explains what might have happened to the passengers is put forth in the last five minutes of part one.

That picture of the nose if the plane trumps what we read about witnesses as the press is owned. All the evidence points to a smaller craft.
http://physics911.net/missingwings

If you look at the first picture on this page, you can see the tail of the craft.
http://0911.site.voila.fr/index3.htm

If you allow for the angle and compare the side of the wall of the Pentagon to the length of the plane, we can see that the plane is too short to be a 757. If a 757 were behind that box, the nose would be protruding. Whatever is behind that box is too short to be a 757.

We read about witnesses. In a conspiracy this big, it's not implausible that there would be planted witnesses all around the area. The compliant press wouldn't report what anyone else said. Anyone who thinks the press wouldn't cooperate with a conspiracy should watch the videos and read the articles below.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbnxsPgcsH0
(8 parts)

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=chomsky+media&search_type=&aq=f

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Media/media_watch.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Propaganda/Propaganda_page.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Media_control_propaganda/Media_Control.html

Cosmored
12-18-2008, 11:39 AM
If anyone wants to do some serious investigation into 9/11, there's a lot of good stuff in the 9/11 threads of these three forums. The first two are the old ones which are read-only. The last one is active.
.
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/index/

wiegenlied
12-18-2008, 11:42 AM
Where were you on that day? You didn't read newspaper? Didn't watch TV?

wiegenlied
12-18-2008, 11:44 AM
If anyone wants to do some serious investigation into 9/11, there's a lot of good stuff in the 9/11 threads of these three forums. The first two are the old ones which are read-only. The last one is active.
.
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/index/

Cosmored you are insane

crockspot
12-18-2008, 12:04 PM
I watched the video. I wouldn't put it past the Chinese to fake it.

I would like to point out though that at about 7:40, when they are comparing video of US vs. Chinese space walks, and wondering why the chinese are so clear, you see a bubble float up in the US video.

Hmmmmmmmm.....

wiegenlied
12-18-2008, 12:13 PM
I watched the video. I wouldn't put it past the Chinese to fake it.

I would like to point out though that at about 7:40, when they are comparing video of US vs. Chinese space walks, and wondering why the chinese are so clear, you see a bubble float up in the US video.

Hmmmmmmmm.....

So you are saying that... ? Which 7.40 one?

wiegenlied
12-18-2008, 12:17 PM
Cosmored argued upon so many things: the moon landing, the 9/11, the Bill Clinton, the imperialism. I myself confused. He himself should wonder why under his theories everything is wrong.

Zathras
12-18-2008, 01:44 PM
If anyone wants to do some serious investigation into 9/11, there's a lot of good stuff in the 9/11 threads of these three forums. The first two are the old ones which are read-only. The last one is active.
.
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/index/

Sorry DUmbass, I have better things to do than go snipe hunting. I'll leave that to the certifiably insane such as yourself.

Zathras
12-18-2008, 01:48 PM
Where were you on that day? You didn't read newspaper? Didn't watch TV?

According to Cosmoron what we all saw on 09-11-01 was faked and we can't believe our eyes. Personally I think the idiot snorted too much model glue as a kid and is lacking in the brain cell department.

PoliCon
12-18-2008, 01:56 PM
Sorry DUmbass, I have better things to do than go snipe hunting. I'll leave that to the certifiably insane such as yourself.
oh but Snipe tastes soooo good when you catch'em :)

wiegenlied
12-18-2008, 02:31 PM
I watched the video. I wouldn't put it past the Chinese to fake it.

I would like to point out though that at about 7:40, when they are comparing video of US vs. Chinese space walks, and wondering why the chinese are so clear, you see a bubble float up in the US video.

Hmmmmmmmm.....

crockspot, you meant the US one is faked or the Chinese one is faked? Cosmored said both are faked.

On that note, neither one is faked.

Rebel Yell
12-18-2008, 03:12 PM
So, let me get this straight...

In the 1960s and 1970s we could land robots on the moon and have them deploy mirrors but we couldn't land a man there?

:rolleyes:

When TNO sees you as crazy........well ;):D

Rebel Yell
12-18-2008, 03:17 PM
Looney Toons are the best way to represent all our trolls.





Cosmonuthttp://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm311/razer2901/Marvin-01.jpg



Meet.......



Blinky http://i261.photobucket.com/albums/ii59/Cane_Nation/inki-1.jpg

asdf2231
12-18-2008, 03:46 PM
If anyone wants to do some serious investigation into 9/11, there's a lot of good stuff in the 9/11 threads of these three forums. The first two are the old ones which are read-only. The last one is active.
.
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/index/

Okay... you just hit Fuck Off And Die territory you glass licking mongoloid homunculus.

Mythic
12-18-2008, 05:17 PM
Cosmored! I want to help you! I feel bad that you are making yourself look like an idiot! There is a smart person in (almost) anyone!

Ok first off time to debunk your "explosion" theory.

Could transformers or other electrical equipment explain some of what the firemen saw and heard? What about an acre of concrete floor slamming into another? Would steel bolts snapping under tremendous tension make a pop or explosive sound? Assuming the towers weren't in the vacuum of space, I think that a loud banging noise could be something else. Don't go shout "BOMB!"

Also, if you want to see an electrical transformer catch on fire and blow up, watch this video.
http://www.stupidcollege.com/items/Electric-Transformer-Explosion

I recommend this site.
http://www.debunking911.com/index.html
It debunks everything conspiracy about 9/11. Of course you wont visit it because you are biased and ignorant, and would like to remain so.

Cosmored
12-21-2008, 11:41 AM
Ok first off time to debunk your "explosion" theory.

Simply providing another possible explanation doesn't constitute "Debunking". Now we have two plausible explanations for the noise--that's all.


I recommend this site.
http://www.debunking911.com/index.html
It debunks everything conspiracy about 9/11. Of course you wont visit it because you are biased and ignorant, and would like to remain so.
I scanned it but I haven't had time to look at everything. From what I saw though, this looks like a typical government damage-control site. They put forth other explanations for the evidence of an inside job and then just consider the evidence to be debunked. I didn't see any explanation for the picture of the nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon?http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg

If there is one, could you post it?

If there are two plausible explanations for lots of the evidence and there is one piece of evidence that is impossible to explain, all of those plausible explanations put forward by the pro-government site fall by the wayside as they are not conclusive proof.

Choose something from that site you provided that you consider to be conclusive proof that 9/11 wasn't an inside job and we can talk about whether it's conclusive proof. I consider that picture of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon to be conclusive proof that 9/11 was an inside job.

Cosmored
12-21-2008, 03:52 PM
They're addressing the faked Chinese space walk at the "Clavius" and "Bad Astronomy" forums.

http://apollohoax.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=othertheories&action=display&thread=2206
http://www.bautforum.com/conspiracy-theories/79327-congratulations-china-but-live-tv-launch-broadcast.html

Click where it says "Web forum" in this site, and you'll get the first forum above.
http://www.clavius.org/

Both of those sites are government damage-control sites and all the regular posters on those sites know that the moon missions were faked. They seem to have been started because so many people are finding out that the Apollo moon missions were faked.

http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showthread.php?t=9002

They're really having a hard time dealing with the evidence that the Chinese space walk was faked in a water tank. They aren't even discussing the evidence that it was faked. They are good at obfuscating evidence but some evidence is so clear that it can't be obfuscated. Those threads are laughable.

newshutr
12-21-2008, 05:11 PM
Is this the same douche bag that was here a long time ago that claimed Aspbergers syndrome?

My Lord this person is a grade A this.. (http://www.drinkstreet.com/searchresults.cgi?drinkid=1908&drinkname=category:34)

Zathras
12-22-2008, 03:06 AM
Those threads are laughable.

Gee what a coincidence. So are yours.

Sonnabend
12-22-2008, 03:50 AM
They're really having a hard time dealing with the evidence that the Chinese space walk was faked in a water tank.

We're having a hard time working out why the men with the butterfly nets haven't come to get you yet.

enslaved1
12-22-2008, 09:51 AM
We're having a hard time working out why the men with the butterfly nets haven't come to get you yet.

They are posted outside the door, figuring as long as he stays in the basement, he's only hurting himself.

FlaGator
12-22-2008, 10:48 AM
They're addressing the faked Chinese space walk at the "Clavius" and "Bad Astronomy" forums.

http://apollohoax.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=othertheories&action=display&thread=2206
http://www.bautforum.com/conspiracy-theories/79327-congratulations-china-but-live-tv-launch-broadcast.html

Click where it says "Web forum" in this site, and you'll get the first forum above.
http://www.clavius.org/

Both of those sites are government damage-control sites and all the regular posters on those sites know that the moon missions were faked. They seem to have been started because so many people are finding out that the Apollo moon missions were faked.

http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showthread.php?t=9002

They're really having a hard time dealing with the evidence that the Chinese space walk was faked in a water tank. They aren't even discussing the evidence that it was faked. They are good at obfuscating evidence but some evidence is so clear that it can't be obfuscated. Those threads are laughable.

Actually it's we're not having a hard time dealing with the evidence. A lot of us here just plain don't care.

Mythic
12-26-2008, 02:55 PM
I cannot even see what you claim isnt a plane in that picture
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg
Cosmored, do you know who released that picture? The government. Why would the government release a picture that would be used as evidence against them?

asdf2231
12-26-2008, 03:08 PM
They're addressing the faked Chinese space walk at the "Clavius" and "Bad Astronomy" forums.

http://apollohoax.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=othertheories&action=display&thread=2206
http://www.bautforum.com/conspiracy-theories/79327-congratulations-china-but-live-tv-launch-broadcast.html

Click where it says "Web forum" in this site, and you'll get the first forum above.
http://www.clavius.org/

Both of those sites are government damage-control sites and all the regular posters on those sites know that the moon missions were faked. They seem to have been started because so many people are finding out that the Apollo moon missions were faked.

http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum505/showthread.php?t=9002

They're really having a hard time dealing with the evidence that the Chinese space walk was faked in a water tank. They aren't even discussing the evidence that it was faked. They are good at obfuscating evidence but some evidence is so clear that it can't be obfuscated. Those threads are laughable.

http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l307/asdf2231/Blogstuff/thestupiditburns.jpg

patriot45
12-26-2008, 03:49 PM
Unmanned robotic craft that had mirrors attached to their sides could have been soft-landed. Those mirrors are not proof that there were people on the moon.


I thought you were just being sarcastic. I don't know the answers to those questions. In the documentary "What Happened on the Moon" they talk about Gagarin. I don't remember what was said.



http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i230/patriot45270/pepsismart.jpg

Sonnabend
12-26-2008, 06:09 PM
All of Cosmotards threads go here in future.

asdf2231
12-26-2008, 07:13 PM
All of Cosmotards threads go here in future.

http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l307/asdf2231/smileys%20and%20fun/LOL-Monty_Python_Applause.gif

Cosmored
12-27-2008, 12:56 PM
I cannot even see what you claim isnt a plane in that picture
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg

I said it was a plane that was smaller than a 757. I didn't say it wasn't a plane.

Read this analysis of the crash.
http://physics911.net/missingwings

It's consistent with the picture of the nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon.


Cosmored, do you know who released that picture? The government. Why would the government release a picture that would be used as evidence against them?
Evidently they did release evidence that could be used against them. Who knows what they were thinking. That picture is of the nose of a craft that is clearly not a 757.

Read this.
http://killtown.911review.org/pentalawn.html

In this picture the craft is behind the box.
http://0911.site.voila.fr/index3.htm

The tail can be seen but not the nose. If you compare the length of the side of the Pentagon where the plane hit to the space behind the box at the same distance from the camera from the crash site, you'll see that a 757 couldn't fit behind the box.

http://www.aviewoncities.com/buildings/washington/pentagon.htm
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/757family/pf/pf_200tech.html

A 757 stood on its tail next to the Pentagon would be twice as tall as the Pentagon. Try putting something that long behind the box in the picture. Even allowing for the angle, it wouldn't fit without the nose protruding. Whatever is behind the box is way too short to be a 757.

Zathras
12-27-2008, 01:04 PM
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l307/asdf2231/Blogstuff/thestupiditburns.jpg

fixed.....

Sonnabend
12-27-2008, 08:57 PM
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f62/Cerriadh/FLOWCHART.png

Cosmored
12-30-2008, 01:26 PM
I'd like to hear everyone's opinion on this.

http://en.epochtimes.com/n2/content/view/8332/
(excerpt)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NASA Engineer Finds More Evidence

Dr. Qu Zheng, Senior Physics Engineer of the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, analyzed the inconsistencies in the live video-feed. The questionable points include that earth’s atmosphere was not visible. A cloud suddenly changed in an obvious fashion, there was no background noise as in past conversations between the astronauts in the spacecraft and regime leader Hu Jintao on earth. The video showed the craft flying over the ocean while it was supposed to be over land according orbit calculations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://en.epochtimes.com/n2/content/view/5809/

Sonnabend
12-30-2008, 03:40 PM
I'd like to hear everyone's opinion on this.

http://www.toonjokes.com/data/media/9/30.jpg

Well..you asked...

PoliCon
12-30-2008, 04:58 PM
I'd like to hear everyone's opinion on this.http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y280/kidwicked/super_retard_stfu.jpg

asdf2231
12-30-2008, 05:53 PM
I'd like to hear everyone's opinion on this.




http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k143/TatersGirl/look_at_my_fuckin_balls.jpg

SarasotaRepub
12-30-2008, 08:04 PM
Why do I leave this idiot here? Can anyone tell me??? :confused::D

asdf2231
12-30-2008, 08:46 PM
Why do I leave this idiot here? Can anyone tell me??? :confused::D

To provoke funny picture of cat nards? :D

Zathras
12-31-2008, 02:01 AM
I'd like to hear everyone's opinion on this.

It's a combo of...

http://www.angelzofevil.de/2004/photos/albums/userpics/normal_WorstAttentionWhore.jpg

and....

http://www.aceofbase.org/james/forumfun/smells_like_bullshit.jpg

Hey Cosmoron, you asked.