The stupid is strong on "Rational"wiki

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gingersnap

Well, wouldn't that apply to virtually all women? I wasn't drafted or eligible for it or even the right age group and I certainly didn't enlist but I have opinions about good or bad wars. Would all women be chicken hawks, then? :confused:

---

I guess if you "strongly" support it. :confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Goldwater

I guess if you "strongly" support it. :confused:

---

What? As opposed to supporting it but faking it? It seems like different rules apply to the gender divide here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gingersnap

What? As opposed to supporting it but faking it? It seems like different rules apply to the gender divide here.

---

It has to because I know no way of defining the term for women.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Goldwater

It has to because I know no way of defining the term for women.

---

Well, if over 50% of the population can't be defined this way, maybe it's a pretty fake term to begin with. It's not like we're talking about ovarian cysts or prostrate enlargement. :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gingersnap

Well, if over 50% of the population can't be defined this way, maybe it's a pretty fake term to begin with. It's not like we're talking about ovarian cysts or prostrate enlargement. :p

---

Perhaps, but I feel the term applies to a coward who wants others to fight in situations they would never ever do so in.

Abraham Lincoln, famous chickenhawk. Ditto for FDR. Or is it only applied to people I dont like, it is confusing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gingersnap

Well, wouldn't that apply to virtually all women? I wasn't drafted or eligible for it or even the right age group and I certainly didn't enlist but I have opinions about good or bad wars. Would all women be chicken hawks, then? :confused:

---

Whoops. Logic rears its ugly head once again. ;)