Then explain why you posted it? There is no gray area in this situation, you either leave the kid alone or you don't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Arroyo_Doble
Printable View
Then explain why you posted it? There is no gray area in this situation, you either leave the kid alone or you don't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Arroyo_Doble
I doubt it. Most liberals when confronted by a real man resort to their favorite hate target; the police. They are Brave Sir Robins until faced with physical confrontation. I suspect you are no different.:cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by Arroyo_Doble
What's your point? That we should allow the Occupistas to threaten children on their way to school? For that matter, do you have a point, besides being snarky?Quote:
Originally Posted by Arroyo_Doble
Then why don't you tell us what you are trying to say.Quote:
Originally Posted by Arroyo_Doble
Again, not clear. You are either calling everyone who objects to the activities in the article pussies, or you are saying that this proves that you aren't one. Neither is supported by the facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Arroyo_Doble
Give him plenty of time to come up with a quibbling explanation. He has to find a liberal manner to weasel out of his nasty remarks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Odysseus
If somebody followed my kids in the name of protest, I'd end up in jail for beating them within an inch of their life.
He's saying it's not okay to target children.Quote:
Originally Posted by Odysseus
You know, just once, can you go by what a liberal actually says instead of trying to nail them to the ground for being a liberal?
No, he's being a snarky asshole.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanie
Searching, searching,,, Nope, can't find the evidence.:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanie
He posted a pic saying "Why can't anybody think about the children."Quote:
Originally Posted by AmPat
Somebody asked him if he was supportive of the protesters by posting that pic?
He said no, just the opposite.
Reading Comprehension classes. Try them sometime.
I know what he said, it's the evidence of the cartoon that makes his words meaningless and a lie. Contextual clues, try them sometime.:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanie
For the record, here is what he actually said:
He merely responded to the attack on children claim with his post. He then said this:Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
So by posting this you're saying that it's OK to attack children.
Nope.
Attacking children is the subject to which he was labeled a "pussy." He responded to the label "pussy" by saying he was the opposite. I think he is calling himself a dick.Quote:
Quote:
This makes you a pussy.
Actually, just the opposite.
Hows that "comprehension" working out for you?:rolleyes: