We have a winna!
Ding, ding, ding!
I don't see how anyone could think Tebow is evil. He doesn't do drugs, he isn't a womanizer, and he's outspoken about his religious beliefs. He's not involved in politics of any kind, which should make his religion irrelevant to the more radical atheists among the DU posters.
Muhammed Ali is all those things, and I don't hear any DUers claiming he's evil. Maybe that's not a fair comparison, as Ali is old and from a different generation, but he is the athlete held up for my generation to view as a role model.
Not only is Tebow not a womanizer, he's a virgin who has professed that he is saving sex for marriage.
Unlike many DUmmies who are celibate because they can't get laid in the first place. That loser Steve numbers comes to mind.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
That depends. Are the producers of Pokemon liberals?
http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ly...5ftxo1_500.jpg
First of all, if you don't know the difference between Jehovah's Witnesses and baptists, then the discussion is over your head already.Quote:
How come no one ever gets his panties in a knot when you have something negative to say about Jehovah's Witnesses or Door to Door Mormons, but when the same attitude and opinion is applied to someone like Tebow it's a character flaw or shot across the bow of all Christians? Missionary Baptists are far from defining Christianity, they're just noisy.
Secondly, is it not a shot across the bow of all Christians? If you replace "Tim Tebow" with any other name, would the reaction from the retards be any different? Of course not. "Liberalism" has been all about this since the beginning, but it's out in the open now.