Read the definition of the word "infringe" and then say that with a straight face.Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterS
Printable View
Read the definition of the word "infringe" and then say that with a straight face.Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterS
Media is supposed to cover ALL sides of an issue and not support one side over the other unlike the vast majority of the media does today.Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterS
Take, for example, the ex-LAPD that's they're hunting for. Take a look at his manefesto. In it there is mantion of how much he loves Obama and other liberals. Have we heard anything about this from the MSM? Not one word but you could bet your life savings that if he mentioned any love for people such as Sara Palin, Rush Limbaugh or his hatred for liberals it would lead every newscast from the MSM.
Little peter knows what it means, they all do but don't give a rats ass about the constitution. They won't stop with the second amendment, the rest will fall soon after if they are allowed to dismantle it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zathras
In a communist country the little peters are the first ones to be executed, dictators don't like idiots either, they just use the stupid fucks to achieve their purpose and then dump them in trenches.
Since you know his manifesto you learned it somewhere didn't you? What do you care what the MSM reports as long as you get the news you want the way you want. Is't this part of a free-market economy where everyone has access to the news they want?Quote:
Originally Posted by Zathras
Read the words "well regulated"!Quote:
Originally Posted by Zathras
What part of "shall not be infringed" is ambiguous to you?Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterS
If you don't know the answer to this question then there's no point in explaining it to you.Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterS
Logical thought is totally foreign to little peter he has a job spewing progressive mantra and that is all he is equipped for.Quote:
Originally Posted by NJCardFan
Any discussion is intellectual masturbation for him because he can only grasp his side of the argument.
As do you. I am sure you know the clause was put in there out of the founders fear of a free standing army and therefore reasoned that we should turn to a citizen militia. So do you want to disband our free standing armies and start up a well regulated citizen militia. If so, I would agree we should be issued the appropriate arms. Untlil that time though an arm sufficient for self defense should do. After of course, you pass a back ground check...Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockntractor
What part of "well regulated milita" is foreign to you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockntractor