Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58

Hybrid View

  1. #1 What tool did Bush need ... 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    to fight terror that FISA didn't provide ?

    In short, why did Bush need to go around FISA ?

    Hint...It's not to save my ass, as most of you cowboys are getting ready to type.

    Is there a legit answer ? ..can we debate this ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Super Moderator BadCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In your dreams
    Posts
    15,616
    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo View Post
    to fight terror that FISA didn't provide ?

    In short, why did Bush need to go around FISA ?

    Hint...It's not to save my ass, as most of you cowboys are getting ready to type.

    Is there a legit answer ? ..can we debate this ?
    How long does it take to get a FISA approved warrant?
    There's your answer.

    rm -rf obama*
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by BadCat View Post
    How long does it take to get a FISA approved warrant?
    There's your answer.
    A FISA warrant isn't needed to wiretap a suspect. It can be obtained later ...after the wiretap has taken place. There's your answer.

    Thanks for playing
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Super Moderator BadCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In your dreams
    Posts
    15,616
    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo View Post
    A FISA warrant isn't needed to wiretap a suspect. It can be obtained later ...after the wiretap has taken place. There's your answer.

    Thanks for playing
    And if, for some stupid liberal reason, the tap is denied? The information obtained is thrown out?

    "Yeah, he's going to blow up Chicago, but that was an illegal wiretap, so you can't arrest him"

    I've seen the decisions of some of the moonbat courts, this would have a high probability of happening.

    rm -rf obama*
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by BadCat View Post
    And if, for some stupid liberal reason, the tap is denied? The information obtained is thrown out?

    "Yeah, he's going to blow up Chicago, but that was an illegal wiretap, so you can't arrest him"

    I've seen the decisions of some of the moonbat courts, this would have a high probability of happening.

    If the info is about a crime or criminal, it wouldn't be thrown out. And 99% of the taps are approved.

    So ...what does that leave us with ? Why did Bush go around FISA ?

    It's not they are taking to long to issue a warrant

    It's not because the intel keeps getting thrown out

    Why ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Super Moderator BadCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In your dreams
    Posts
    15,616
    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo View Post
    If the info is about a crime or criminal, it wouldn't be thrown out. And 99% of the taps are approved.

    So ...what does that leave us with ? Why did Bush go around FISA ?

    It's not they are taking to long to issue a warrant

    It's not because the intel keeps getting thrown out

    Why ?
    Oh please.

    We got a "president" who thinks the murderers at Gitmo deserve the same Constitutional protections offered to US citizens.

    Many of them would have been thrown out. The Ninth Circus Court thinks that whales have rights.

    rm -rf obama*
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Constitutionally Speaking's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    4,301
    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo View Post
    A FISA warrant isn't needed to wiretap a suspect. It can be obtained later ...after the wiretap has taken place. There's your answer.

    Thanks for playing

    You really don't know do you???


    President Bush's policy was nothing new and the courts have affirmed he acted legally. Pissant.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1232...mEditorialPage
    I long for the days when our President actually liked our country.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by Constitutionally Speaking View Post
    You really don't know do you???


    President Bush's policy was nothing new and the courts have affirmed he acted legally. Pissant.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1232...mEditorialPage
    Look at that, the namecalling mod opened his mouth...

    And you couldn't be MORE WRONG. The link you provided shows us the FISA court approved Bush to collect FOREIGN intel....not domestic.

    The FISA appeals court said in its 2002 opinion In re Sealed Case that the President has "inherent authority to conduct warrantless searches to obtain foreign intelligence information" and took "for granted" that "FISA could not encroach on the President's constitutional power
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    HR Corporate Scum patriot45's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Plant City, Florida
    Posts
    10,892
    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo View Post
    to fight terror that FISA didn't provide ?

    In short, why did Bush need to go around FISA ?

    Hint...It's not to save my ass, as most of you cowboys are getting ready to type.

    Is there a legit answer ? ..can we debate this ?
    Its been debated to death, so no.

    Take this,


    : “Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal.”
    ” Obummercare, 20 percent of the time it works everytime.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo View Post
    to fight terror that FISA didn't provide ?

    In short, why did Bush need to go around FISA ?

    Hint...It's not to save my ass, as most of you cowboys are getting ready to type.

    Is there a legit answer ? ..can we debate this ?
    Not until you learn something about the subject. Until then - shouldn't you be at recess?
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •