Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58
  1. #1 What tool did Bush need ... 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    to fight terror that FISA didn't provide ?

    In short, why did Bush need to go around FISA ?

    Hint...It's not to save my ass, as most of you cowboys are getting ready to type.

    Is there a legit answer ? ..can we debate this ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Super Moderator BadCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In your dreams
    Posts
    15,616
    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo View Post
    to fight terror that FISA didn't provide ?

    In short, why did Bush need to go around FISA ?

    Hint...It's not to save my ass, as most of you cowboys are getting ready to type.

    Is there a legit answer ? ..can we debate this ?
    How long does it take to get a FISA approved warrant?
    There's your answer.

    rm -rf obama*
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by BadCat View Post
    How long does it take to get a FISA approved warrant?
    There's your answer.
    A FISA warrant isn't needed to wiretap a suspect. It can be obtained later ...after the wiretap has taken place. There's your answer.

    Thanks for playing
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Super Moderator BadCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In your dreams
    Posts
    15,616
    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo View Post
    A FISA warrant isn't needed to wiretap a suspect. It can be obtained later ...after the wiretap has taken place. There's your answer.

    Thanks for playing
    And if, for some stupid liberal reason, the tap is denied? The information obtained is thrown out?

    "Yeah, he's going to blow up Chicago, but that was an illegal wiretap, so you can't arrest him"

    I've seen the decisions of some of the moonbat courts, this would have a high probability of happening.

    rm -rf obama*
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    HR Corporate Scum patriot45's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Plant City, Florida
    Posts
    10,929
    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo View Post
    to fight terror that FISA didn't provide ?

    In short, why did Bush need to go around FISA ?

    Hint...It's not to save my ass, as most of you cowboys are getting ready to type.

    Is there a legit answer ? ..can we debate this ?
    Its been debated to death, so no.

    Take this,


    : “Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal.”
    ” Obummercare, 20 percent of the time it works everytime.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by BadCat View Post
    And if, for some stupid liberal reason, the tap is denied? The information obtained is thrown out?

    "Yeah, he's going to blow up Chicago, but that was an illegal wiretap, so you can't arrest him"

    I've seen the decisions of some of the moonbat courts, this would have a high probability of happening.

    If the info is about a crime or criminal, it wouldn't be thrown out. And 99% of the taps are approved.

    So ...what does that leave us with ? Why did Bush go around FISA ?

    It's not they are taking to long to issue a warrant

    It's not because the intel keeps getting thrown out

    Why ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Super Moderator BadCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In your dreams
    Posts
    15,616
    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo View Post
    If the info is about a crime or criminal, it wouldn't be thrown out. And 99% of the taps are approved.

    So ...what does that leave us with ? Why did Bush go around FISA ?

    It's not they are taking to long to issue a warrant

    It's not because the intel keeps getting thrown out

    Why ?
    Oh please.

    We got a "president" who thinks the murderers at Gitmo deserve the same Constitutional protections offered to US citizens.

    Many of them would have been thrown out. The Ninth Circus Court thinks that whales have rights.

    rm -rf obama*
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by BadCat View Post
    Oh please.

    We got a "president" who thinks the murderers at Gitmo deserve the same Constitutional protections offered to US citizens.

    Many of them would have been thrown out. The Ninth Circus Court thinks that whales have rights.
    If there are murderers at Gitmo ...then why did Bush release hundreds of murderers from there ?

    LOL ...I own you.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by BadCat View Post
    Oh please.

    We got a "president" who thinks the murderers at Gitmo deserve the same Constitutional protections offered to US citizens.

    Many of them would have been thrown out. The Ninth Circus Court thinks that whales have rights.
    But again ....

    Why did Bush go around FISA ? ...what tool was he lacking ?

    LOL ...I own all of you.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    "A wiretap requires a court order" -GWB

    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •