What tool did Bush need ...

[Ringo]

to fight terror that FISA didn't provide ?

In short, why did Bush need to go around FISA ?

Hint...It's not to save my ass, as most of you cowboys are getting ready to type.

Is there a legit answer ? ..can we debate this ?

[BadCat]

to fight terror that FISA didn't provide ?

In short, why did Bush need to go around FISA ?

Hint...It's not to save my ass, as most of you cowboys are getting ready to type.

Is there a legit answer ? ..can we debate this ?

How long does it take to get a FISA approved warrant?
There's your answer.

[Ringo]

How long does it take to get a FISA approved warrant?
There's your answer.

A FISA warrant isn't needed to wiretap a suspect. It can be obtained later ...after the wiretap has taken place. There's your answer.

Thanks for playing

[BadCat]

A FISA warrant isn't needed to wiretap a suspect. It can be obtained later ...after the wiretap has taken place. There's your answer.

Thanks for playing

And if, for some stupid liberal reason, the tap is denied? The information obtained is thrown out?

"Yeah, he's going to blow up Chicago, but that was an illegal wiretap, so you can't arrest him"

I've seen the decisions of some of the moonbat courts, this would have a high probability of happening.

[patriot45]

to fight terror that FISA didn't provide ?

In short, why did Bush need to go around FISA ?

Hint...It's not to save my ass, as most of you cowboys are getting ready to type.

Is there a legit answer ? ..can we debate this ?

Its been debated to death, so no.

Take this,

[Ringo]

And if, for some stupid liberal reason, the tap is denied? The information obtained is thrown out?

"Yeah, he's going to blow up Chicago, but that was an illegal wiretap, so you can't arrest him"

I've seen the decisions of some of the moonbat courts, this would have a high probability of happening.

If the info is about a crime or criminal, it wouldn't be thrown out. And 99% of the taps are approved.

So ...what does that leave us with ? Why did Bush go around FISA ?

It's not they are taking to long to issue a warrant

It's not because the intel keeps getting thrown out

Why ?

[BadCat]

If the info is about a crime or criminal, it wouldn't be thrown out. And 99% of the taps are approved.

So ...what does that leave us with ? Why did Bush go around FISA ?

It's not they are taking to long to issue a warrant

It's not because the intel keeps getting thrown out

Why ?

Oh please.

We got a "president" who thinks the murderers at Gitmo deserve the same Constitutional protections offered to US citizens.

Many of them would have been thrown out. The Ninth Circus Court thinks that whales have rights.

[Ringo]

Oh please.

We got a "president" who thinks the murderers at Gitmo deserve the same Constitutional protections offered to US citizens.

Many of them would have been thrown out. The Ninth Circus Court thinks that whales have rights.

If there are murderers at Gitmo ...then why did Bush release hundreds of murderers from there ?

LOL ...I own you.

[Ringo]

Oh please.

We got a "president" who thinks the murderers at Gitmo deserve the same Constitutional protections offered to US citizens.

Many of them would have been thrown out. The Ninth Circus Court thinks that whales have rights.

But again ....

Why did Bush go around FISA ? ...what tool was he lacking ?

LOL ...I own all of you.

[Ringo]

"A wiretap requires a court order" -GWB