Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 35
  1. #11  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo View Post
    We already know where DEMOCRATS stand. For 8 years they have taken a position against our constitution, and against our nation. They want the nation to fail with new taxes, socialized Meds, handing over our sovereignty to the UN, letting terrorists go free, promoting gay marriage and abortions, etc. etc.


    Very predictable.
    FIXED......
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member Zathras's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    San Jose, California
    Posts
    6,378
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    Against the constitution? Which article? which Amendment? Which passage? Be specific please or SHUT THE FUCK UP.
    Oh, now you've done it. Asking the DUmbass known as Ringo to defend his rantings with impartial facts is like going to war with the French...useless.
    Solve a man's problem with violence and help him for a day. Teach a man how to solve his problems with violence, help him for a lifetime - Belkar Bitterleaf
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    Against the constitution? Which article? which Amendment? Which passage? Be specific please or SHUT THE FUCK UP.
    Habeas Corpus. Here is video of the AG telling Congress that we don't have Habeas Corpus rights.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIFqYVAOosM

    The Constitution says Habaes Corpus can only be suspended in time of revolution, or invasion.

    Be specific ? ... Article One, Section 9

    So ...who rebelled ? ...who invaded ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo View Post
    Habeas Corpus. Here is video of the AG telling Congress that we don't have Habeas Corpus rights.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIFqYVAOosM

    The Constitution says Habaes Corpus can only be suspended in time of revolution, or invasion.

    Be specific ? ... Article One, Section 9

    So ...who rebelled ? ...who invaded ?
    And since when do Habeas corpus rights apply to non-citizens held outside of America? And is there any historical example of Habeas corpus ever being granted to prisoners of war?
    Last edited by PoliCon; 01-22-2009 at 01:18 PM.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    And since when do Habeas corpus rights apply to non-citizens held outside of America? And is there any historical example of Habeas corpus ever being granted to prisoners of war?
    You didn't watch the video buddy, the part you need to see is around 2:10 and on ...

    Gonzo is talking about American citizens ...and says so clearly.

    Look here as well....

    "The Constitution doesn't say every individual in the United States or every citizen is hereby granted or assured the right of habeas,'' Gonzales told Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Jan. 17. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NGDONO11O1.DTL

    You couldn't be more wrong .....again.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Ringo View Post
    You didn't watch the video buddy, the part you need to see is around 2:10 and on ...

    Gonzo is talking about American citizens ...and says so clearly.

    Look here as well....

    "The Constitution doesn't say every individual in the United States or every citizen is hereby granted or assured the right of habeas,'' Gonzales told Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Jan. 17. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NGDONO11O1.DTL

    You couldn't be more wrong .....again.
    answer the questions you TOOL.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member Molon Labe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Jihad Me At Hello
    Posts
    4,771
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    And since when do Habeas corpus rights apply to non-citizens held outside of America?
    I once thought that way.....

    But if our rights are "natural and inalienable"....then how do they "not" apply?
    Gun Control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound - Unknown


    The problem is Empty People, Not Loaded Guns - Linda Schrock Taylor
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by Molon Labe View Post
    I once thought that way.....

    But if our rights are "natural and inalienable"....then how do they "not" apply?
    The Supreme Court ruled that non-citizens have the rights as well.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #19  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Molon Labe View Post
    I once thought that way.....

    But if our rights are "natural and inalienable"....then how do they "not" apply?
    During times of War when you're talking about illegal combatants. BESIDED - prisoners of war have always been held until the end of the war or until an exchange can take place between combatant governments.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #20  
    Senior Member Molon Labe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Jihad Me At Hello
    Posts
    4,771
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    During times of War when you're talking about illegal combatants. BESIDED - prisoners of war have always been held until the end of the war or until an exchange can take place between combatant governments.
    I guess that's one of the problems of a war with ill defined goals as to when and how the end of the GWOT is reached. It's ubiquitous at best....like war on drugs etc.
    The best figure I can come up with is the one McCain set. What was it....a 100 years? Kinda leaves it wide open to me.

    Which government will they be released to?
    Gun Control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound - Unknown


    The problem is Empty People, Not Loaded Guns - Linda Schrock Taylor
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •