Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1 New Rain Forests Anger Eco-Nazis. 
    New Jungles Prompt a Debate on Rain Forests

    By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
    Published: January 29, 2009

    CHILIBRE, Panama — The land where Marta Ortega de Wing raised hundreds of pigs until 10 years ago is being overtaken by galloping jungle — palms, lizards and ants.

    Jungle is developing again on old holdings around Chilibre. Instead of farming, she now shops at the supermarket and her grown children and grandchildren live in places like Panama City and New York.

    Here, and in other tropical countries around the world, small holdings like Ms. Ortega de Wing’s — and much larger swaths of farmland — are reverting to nature, as people abandon their land and move to the cities in search of better livings.

    These new “secondary” forests are emerging in Latin America, Asia and other tropical regions at such a fast pace that the trend has set off a serious debate about whether saving primeval rain forest — an iconic environmental cause — may be less urgent than once thought. By one estimate, for every acre of rain forest cut down each year, more than 50 acres of new forest are growing in the tropics on land that was once farmed, logged or ravaged by natural disaster.

    “There is far more forest here than there was 30 years ago,” said Ms. Ortega de Wing, 64, who remembers fields of mango trees and banana plants.

    The new forests, the scientists argue, could blunt the effects of rain forest destruction by absorbing carbon dioxide, the leading heat-trapping gas linked to global warming, one crucial role that rain forests play. They could also, to a lesser extent, provide habitat for endangered species.

    The idea has stirred outrage among environmentalists who believe that vigorous efforts to protect native rain forest should remain a top priority. But the notion has gained currency in mainstream organizations like the Smithsonian Institution and the United Nations, which in 2005 concluded that new forests were “increasing dramatically” and “undervalued” for their environmental benefits. The United Nations is undertaking the first global catalog of the new forests, which vary greatly in their stage of growth.

    “Biologists were ignoring these huge population trends and acting as if only original forest has conservation value, and that’s just wrong,” said Joe Wright, a senior scientist at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute here, who set off a firestorm two years ago by suggesting that the new forests could substantially compensate for rain forest destruction.
    LMAO! :D

    NYT
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Celtic Rose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    459
    Wait, you mean that new rain forest areas count just as much as old rain forest areas! What a concept :p
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Celtic Rose View Post
    Wait, you mean that new rain forest areas count just as much as old rain forest areas! What a concept :p
    That plus less money for these liberal bleeding heart organizations to suck out of stupid eco-wienies.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Power CUer FlaGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Swamps of N. Florida
    Posts
    22,268
    Amazing! These forests sprout up and grow with no liberal assistance or reforesting program needed. Who'd have thought that the Earth could take care of itself?

    I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.
    C. S. Lewis
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •