Thread: Firefighters Flaming Over Tat Ban.

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Hybrid View

  1. #1 Firefighters Flaming Over Tat Ban. 
    Firefighters fired up over tattoo rules

    By Kerry Cavanaugh, Staff Writer
    Article Last Updated: 06/23/2008 10:48:56 PM PDT

    Los Angeles city firefighters are heated up over a new policy that requires them to cover all visible tattoos while on the job, no matter whether they're responding to a call or making dinner in the firehouse.
    Since the policy took effect May 1, firefighters complain they've had to wear sweat shirts, long sleeves, and even skin patches to hide their body art.

    Firefighter David Navarro, 50, developed a rash from the patch he wears over the American eagle imprinted on his forearm.

    The veteran got the tattoo while serving in the Marine Corps and said he never once heard a complaint from the public about his or other firefighters' tattoos. In fact, he said, he now gets more questions from people about the patch; they ask whether he was burned or hurt on the job.

    "A tattoo isn't a safety issue. They just say it's about appearance," Navarro said.

    "I find it offensive in a way. You're making me hide my pride for the military. I served my country for 27 years and now they're saying, `Your eagle is no good'?"

    But LAFD officials said they're simply following the lead of other public-safety agencies that have cracked down on personnel who come to work covered in body art.
    (snip)

    Last week, the union filed a grievance after one chief officer instructed captains to check firefighters to make sure their tattoos were covered while they were in bed sleeping.

    The policy change especially bothered some longtime firefighters who suddenly found that their tattoos were offensive and should be covered.

    "I have lived, eaten and breathed the fire service for 20 years and all of a sudden management does not consider my appearance professional. I'm a black sheep," said John O'Connor, a longtime firefighter who has flames and fire-service tattoos over most of his arms.

    O'Connor said he wants the Fire Department to change the policy so the prohibition on exposed tattoos would only apply to new body art. Or at least, he said, loosen the restrictions in the firehouse.

    (more)
    I'm not wild about viewing body art involuntarily but I think it's nuts to make them cover up when they are in the firehouse.

    Tats
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Quote Originally Posted by Gingersnap View Post
    I'm not wild about viewing body art involuntarily but I think it's nuts to make them cover up when they are in the firehouse.

    Tats
    The LAPD has already gone through the new Mayors policy changes amid much grumbling and moaning.The LAFD will also adjust to the forced mindless changes.

    The Mayor being a sensitive critter has just officiated at one of the first 'gay' weddings in the state so that's alright with him.
    I await the first discrimination lawsuit by a Bi-sexual transvestite with tattooed eyebrown and a tongue and nose studs.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Junebug68's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    345
    This is just plain stupid - if someone comes to put my flaming house out, I'm not going to send them away because they have a tatoo
    They're not people, they're hippies!! -Cartman

    It is nothing against you to fall down flat, but to lie there - that's disgrace
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •