Though my post count in low, I do spend a good amount of time surfing between here and DU to anger up my blood on a daily basis. With that said, I would like to offer you my DU-esque tinfoil hat conspiracy of the day:
There's a thread over there (sorry, link not provided) wherein the DUmmies are discussing whether or not resodding the National Mall is an appropriate item in the Stimulus Bill. One poster goes on to CTRL+C/V a transcript of Michael Steel attempting to explain to George Steponallofus that there is a difference between the "temporary work" in Obama's bill and creating jobs.
Has anyone given any thought to the possibility that all of these onsee-twosee little government projects in the Stimulus Bill is INTENDED to result in creating a large number of government employees?
Call me crazy, but once the jobs in THIS stimulus bill are gone, all these new UNION government workers will be laid off, put on unemployment bennies (paid by you and I) and end up being a defacto population of government serfs at the loyal beck & call of Obama to provide them new jobs or continue their benefits.
I don't think they want to create jobs at all. They want workers. Dependant, loyal, voting workers.
What say you, Comrade?