06-27-2008, 06:54 PM
- Join Date
- May 2008
06-27-2008, 07:14 PM
At Coretta Scott King's funeral in early 2006, Ethel Kennedy, the widow of Robert Kennedy, leaned over to him and whispered, "The torch is being passed to you." "A chill went up my spine," Obama told an aide. (Newsweek)
06-27-2008, 09:34 PM--Odysseus
Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.
Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
06-27-2008, 10:01 PM
As for your second statement, I think we level headed conservatives know the policymakers in this country have succumedto the totalitarian temptation a long time ago...after all Fascism wont come to America with Black Shirts and Jackboots. Happy, nice Fascism is the liberal order of the day. Smiley smiley:D
Just look at the recent decisions of San Fransicko DA Kamala Harris and how she decides prosecuting GangBangers isn't such a great idea, then a father and his 2 sons get slaughtered over a roadside dispute by a gun toting illegal alien. Me thinks we should round up a posse and do things how they did in the Old West.
More info on the story here, linked from Dr. Savage's website:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...BAV711FM4F.DTL"Don't vote. It only encourages the bastards." -PJ O'Roarke
06-28-2008, 03:01 AM
Israel (we know they have them but we don't admit it)
States Formerly Possessing or Pursuing Nuclear Weapons:
Former Soviet States
Other Nuclear Capable States:
Now, which of these do you claim the Russians armed? Even if the Russians armed them, how does a past wrong negate a present wrong?
The Russians have little to do with the current state of nuclear states... at least they have no more culpability than we do.
I don't mean to suggest that we don't have an active interest in what goes on between the N.K. and S.K....I'm just not convinced that we do more good than harm in negotiations between the two. And I see little strategic value of an insiginficant peninsula.
We ultimately agree on the last point you made.
If direct intervention with a nuclear state that threatens to rain fire on your western seaboard isn't rational, what exactly is?
Last edited by Full-Auto; 06-28-2008 at 03:06 AM.I like to shoot people with my CANON.
SonnabendGuest06-28-2008, 04:11 AMOther Nuclear Capable States:
We have ONE reactor, used for making nucleonic particles for radiation medicine. We have no delivery systems, no programs, no long range bombers, no missile sites, no research...
06-28-2008, 04:20 AM
Australia is not currently known or believed to possess weapons of mass destruction, although it has participated in extensive research into nuclear, biological and chemical weapons in the past.
Last edited by Full-Auto; 06-28-2008 at 04:23 AM.I like to shoot people with my CANON.
06-28-2008, 05:20 AM
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Woodland Park, Colorado, United States
Big Lie 1: It is impossible to deport 12 million illegals.
Easy Answer: The Mexicans did it.
Big Lie 2: It is impossible to secure our southern border.
Easy Answer: We secured the northern border of South Korea for the last 55 years.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|