Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1 NASA satellite crashes minutes after launch 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    793
    It was carrying a carbon-monitoring satellite into orbit...let the conspiracies begin!

    NASA satellite crashes minutes after launch
    Link
    (CNN) -- A NASA satellite crashed back to Earth about three minutes after launch early Tuesday, officials said.

    "We could not make orbit," NASA program manager John Brunschwyler said. "Initial indications are the vehicle did not have enough [force] to reach orbit and landed just short of Antarctica in the ocean."

    "Certainly for the science community, it's a huge disappointment."

    The satellite, which would have monitored greenhouse gases to study how they affect the Earth's climate, was launched on a Taurus XL rocket from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California at 1:55 a.m. PT (4:55 a.m. ET).

    But the payload fairing -- a clamshell-shaped structure that allows the satellite to travel through space -- failed to separate from the rocket, NASA officials said. See video of launch »

    The weight of the fairing caused the rocket and the satellite to come crashing down to Earth about three minutes later.

    A team of investigators will look into what caused the payload fairing to fail to separate.

    "We'll get back to flying at a pace that allows us to do so successfully," said Chuck Dovale, NASA Launch Director, at a press briefing after the failed launch.

    The $273 million satellite, called the Orbiting Carbon Observatory, would have collected global measurements of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth's atmosphere to help better forecast changes in carbon-dioxide levels and their effect on the Earth's climate.

    Carbon dioxide is considered a greenhouse gas because it traps heat, which scientists believe contributes to the warming of the planet. Carbon dioxide also absorbs wavelengths of light, and the NASA observatory would have measured levels of the gas partly by using instruments to analyze light reflected off the Earth.

    The OCO also would have provided information about CO2 "sinks" -- areas, like oceans or landfills, that absorb and store carbon dioxide. NASA officials said all measurements would be combined with the findings of ground observation stations, providing a more complete account of the human and natural sources of CO2.

    The OCO project took eight years to develop, said Michael Frelich, director of the NASA Earth Science Division. Its failure is a great loss for the science community, he said.
    "Because we're a great nation, our challenges seem complex; it will always be this way. But as long as we remember our first principals and believe in ourselves, the future will always be ours." -Reagan
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    TANSTAAFL. asdf2231's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    The greatest country on Earth.
    Posts
    2,619
    Anybody happen to know what the Carbon Footprint of a failed rocket launch might be? :D
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member stsinner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,525
    Time to scrap that stupid and wasteful organization.. How many millions did that debacle just cost us?
    Obama-if you're being run out of town, get out in front and pretend that it's a parade!!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •