So does this FINALLY mean that the good, law abiding people of D.C. can legally have a firearm in their possession?
The NRA said Shitcago is next, not sure where the folks affiliated with the CATO institute are going next.
This leads to an interesting series of decisions. On the one hand, the states cannot execute child rapists, on the other hand, individuals can own firearms. Obviously, if you read between the lines, there's an implied right for individuals to shoot child rapists. :D
From this, the answer is yes. This strengthens the case here as well, now that this question has been well and truly answered.I and a lot of others were never happy with the gun laws here, and maybe this will help us overturn them eventually.So does this FINALLY mean that the good, law abiding people of D.C. can legally have a firearm in their possession?
I am happy for you all..and wish we had the same rights.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|