Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1 When Democrats derailed a GOP Latino nominee 
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    When Democrats derailed a GOP Latino nominee
    snip
    ...Them Libbers always change the rules then P&M about them Evil Repukes !"

    Unless something entirely unforeseen happens, confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor will be a lovefest for the Democrats who run the Senate Judiciary Committee.
    snip
    ..............................
    For some Republicans, however, it will be hard to avoid thinking back a few years, to a confirmation hearing that didn't end happily at all. In 2001, President George W. Bush nominated former Justice Department lawyer Miguel Estrada to a seat on the federal courts of appeals. In that instance, as today, the nominee was was a Hispanic with a compelling story and impressive qualifications.
    ............................
    And some of the very people who are today praising Sotomayor spent their time devising extraordinary measures to kill Estrada's chances, Durbin, (Kennedy),Schumer and Reid !
    .......................
    Born in Honduras, Estrada came to the United States at 17, not knowing a word of English. He learned the language almost instantly, and within a few years was graduating with honors from Columbia University and heading off to Harvard Law School. He clerked for Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, was a prosecutor in New York, and worked at the Justice Department in Washington before entering private practice.
    ...................
    Estrada's nomination for a federal judgeship set off alarm bells among Democrats.
    .........................
    There is a group of left-leaning organizations -- People for the American Way, NARAL, the Alliance for Justice, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, the NAACP, and others -- that work closely with Senate Democrats to promote Democratic judicial nominations and kill Republican ones.
    ............................
    They were particularly concerned about Estrada.
    ...........................
    In November, 2001, representatives of those groups met with Democratic Senate staff. One of those staffers then wrote a memo to Democratic Sen. Richard Durbin, informing Durbin that the groups wanted to stall Bush nominees, particularly three they had identified as good targets. "They also identified Miguel Estrada as especially dangerous," the staffer added, "because he has a minimal paper trail, he is Latino(Pro-Life Catholic), and the White House seems to be grooming him for a Supreme Court appointment. They want to hold Estrada off as long as possible."
    .......................
    It was precisely the fact that Estrada was Hispanic that made Democrats and their activist allies want to kill his nomination. They were determined to deny a Republican White House credit, political and otherwise, for putting a first-rate Hispanic nominee on the bench.

    Durbin and his colleagues did as they were instructed. But they had nothing with which to kill the nomination -- no outrageous statement by Estrada, no ethical lapse, no nothing. What to do?

    They brainstormed. Estrada had once worked in the Justice Department's Office of Solicitor General, right? (Appointed under the first President Bush, Estrada stayed to serve several years under Clinton.) That office decides which cases the government will pursue in the Supreme Court, right? And that process involves confidential legal memoranda, right? Well, why don't we suggest that there might be something damaging in those memos -- we have no idea whether there is or not -- and demand that they be made public?
    ....................
    Durbin and his colleagues knew the Bush Justice Department would insist the internal legal memos remain confidential, as they always had been. It wasn’t just the Bush Administration that thought releasing the documents was a terrible idea; all seven living former Solicitors General, Republican and Democrat, wrote a letter to Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy begging him to back off.
    ................
    But the Democrats didn't back off. They had a new, very serious question to ask: What is Miguel Estrada hiding?
    ..................
    The answer was nothing, of course. But the strategy worked. Democrats stonewalled Estrada's nomination, and, after losing control of the Senate in 2002, they began an unprecedented round of filibusters to block an entire slate of Bush appeals-courts nominees, Estrada among them. The confirmation process ground to a halt. More than two years after his nomination was announced, Estrada, tired of what appeared to be an endless runaround, withdrew his name from consideration. Instead of being on the federal bench, he is now in private practice in Washington.

    And that was how Democrats treated the last high-level Hispanic court nominee. Think about that when you watch their lovefest with Sonia Sotomayor.
    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/po...-46407227.html
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    183
    They only called her a dumb racist.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,000
    Quote Originally Posted by nero View Post
    They only called her a dumb racist.
    she is a racist.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,578
    Quote Originally Posted by nero View Post
    They only called her a dumb racist.
    I know you are only here to troll but can you answer me this? What if a white man had said all those things she has said? what would be the reaction of the MSM or liberals?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by Lars1701a View Post
    I know you are only here to troll but can you answer me this? What if a white man had said all those things she has said? what would be the reaction of the MSM or liberals?
    The facts ?

    A white man has said those same things, the white man is Alito, he IS a SC Justice. When he said these same things, the repubs praised him for it.

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/5...dicial-outlook

    OWNED.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    183
    Alito must be a racist.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,000
    dailykos is real reputable source.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Quote Originally Posted by Jfor View Post
    dailykos is real reputable source.
    For a kneeJerker, yes it is !
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,578
    Quote Originally Posted by nero View Post
    The facts ?

    A white man has said those same things, the white man is Alito, he IS a SC Justice. When he said these same things, the repubs praised him for it.

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/5...dicial-outlook

    OWNED.
    EERRRRRR wrong

    Try again loser.


    No where did he say being a white man would make him a better judge then a Latina women


    Like this bitch saying her being a latina women would make her a better judge.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by megimoo View Post
    For a kneeJerker, yes it is !
    Ummm, There is video of alito, did they fake the video ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •