Thread: "Homosexuality is Beginning to Sound like an Infectious Disease !"

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25
  1. #1 "Homosexuality is Beginning to Sound like an Infectious Disease !" 
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    'Gay' family kids 7 times more likely to be homosexual
    But report shows researchers concealing information

    ......................................
    Eight percent of adult children reared by lesbians "had a homosexual relationship even though they weren't sexually attracted to same-sex partners," Hansen wrote
    .......................................
    "Concealing and/or downplaying research findings that suggest differences between children reared by homosexuals and those reared by heterosexuals, changes the way some citizens vote and judges rule on issues related to same-sex marriage, homosexual adoption, etc. And many of those who conduct those studies know that," she continued.
    .................................
    "No one should be surprised that homosexual parents are more likely to raise homosexual children.

    As one of the few forthright pro-homosexual advocates proclaimed, 'Of course our children are going to be different,'" Hansen said.

    "No one knows for sure by what complex mechanisms homosexual parents disproportionately rear homosexual children
    ...............................
    A licensed psychologist with both clinical and forensic practice outreaches is warning that it appears children of homosexual couples are seven times more likely to develop (Homosexual) "non-heterosexual preferences" than other children, but lawmakers establishing policy often don't know that because the researchers have concealed their discoveries.
    .....................
    "Research although not definitive, suggests that children reared by openly homosexual parents are far more likely to engage in homosexual behavior than children raised by others," said the online report .
    ...........................
    Studies she reviewed suggest children raised by homosexual or bisexual parents "are approximately seven times more likely than the general population to develop a non-heterosexual
    (Homosexual) sexual preference."

    The "studies thus far find that between 8 percent and 21 percent of homosexually parented children ultimately identify as (Homosexual) non-heterosexual ," the psychologist wrote. "For comparison purposes, approximately 2 percent of the general population are non-heterosexual. Therefore, if these percentages continue to hold true, children of homosexuals have a 4 to 10 times greater likelihood of developing a non-heterosexual (Homosexual) preference than other children."

    However, those researchers who found such differences "nonetheless declared in their research summaries that no differences were found," the report said.

    ...............................
    "Many believe they concealed their findings so as not to harm their own pro-homosexual, sociopolitical agendas," the report said.
    ......................
    For example, Among the numerous studies Hansen reviewed was the 1996 work by Golombok and Tasker.

    The authors of the study specifically looking at children of homosexual parents found "the large majority of children who grew up in lesbian families identified as heterosexual."
    .........................
    However, Hansen said in the study, in order for an adult child to be classified as (Homosexual) non-heterosexual, "the adult child had to currently identify as non-heterosexual and commit to a future identity as a (Homosexual) non-heterosexual a very unusual method for coding (Homosexual) non-heterosexuality."

    She continued, "The authors didn't mention this point or offer any explanations or comments about it. Nonetheless, 16 percent of those reared by lesbians had homosexual or bisexual levels of same-sex attraction, while 0 percent of the children of heterosexuals did. That's 16 percent compared to 0 percent. Additionally, 67 percent of the children from lesbian family backgrounds said that they had 'previously considered, or thought it a future possibility, that they might experience same-gender attraction or have a same-gender sexual relationship or both' compared to 14 percent of children from heterosexual families. That's 67 percent compared to 14 percent."
    ........................
    Eight percent of adult children reared by lesbians "had a homosexual relationship even though they weren't sexually attracted to same-sex partners," Hansen wrote.
    .........................
    Hansen, who works with marriage, parenting, male-female difference issues, told WND that there is little scientific research on the long-term impact of homosexual parenting on children, and no definitive conclusions can be drawn.

    However, she said what information is available suggests children raised by homosexuals have different sexual orientation, gender identity and gender role behaviors from those children raised by heterosexual couples.

    The concealment of information is no surprise, either.

    "Most of the researchers involved in the study of homosexually-parented children are self-proclaimed pro-homosexual parenting researchers," Hansen told WND. "Many of these researchers, as well as others, admit that acknowledging differences between homosexually- and heterosexually-parented children would be detrimental to their goals of wide-spread social acceptance of same-sex marriage, homosexual adoption, homosexual foster parenting, etc.

    "Concealing and/or downplaying research findings that suggest differences between children reared by homosexuals and those reared by heterosexuals, changes the way some citizens vote and judges rule on issues related to same-sex marriage, homosexual adoption, etc. And many of those who conduct those studies know that," she continued.

    Policymakers need that information to make reasonable policy, too.

    "The circumstances under which children are reared are immensely important to a civilization. Earlier social experiments, such as no-fault divorce and the broad acceptance of single motherhood, resulted in disaster by increasing the number of fatherless children, many who now fill our prisons and welfare rolls. Policy makers, judges, and citizens need to know the truth: children need fathers and changing legal standards such as the definition of marriage will deliberately deprive even more children of them," her report said.

    "Homosexuals, and others who support their cause, understandably desire social and legal acceptance of their lifestyles and partnerships. One of the methods for achieving that goal is to convince the public that homosexual parenting isn't detrimental to children. Concealing and/or downplaying research findings which reveal that children raised by homosexuals are different in fundamental ways from other children, is part of that socio-political agenda intended to sway voters and judges," she said.

    Hansen suggested all scientists have biases especially when such an "emotionally-charged" issue is at hand.

    But if the authors of these studies want to be regarded as scientists, and not activists, "they must set aside their biases and straightforwardly present their findings," she wrote.

    "No one should be surprised that homosexual parents are more likely to raise homosexual children. As one of the few forthright pro-homosexual advocates proclaimed, 'Of course our children are going to be different,'" Hansen said. "No one knows for sure by what complex mechanisms homosexual parents disproportionately rear homosexual children. But regardless of how, it appears they do.
    ...................................
    The public needs to be made aware of the findings of these studies so that when courts adjudicate and citizens vote on issues related to homosexuality, they're fully informed as to the possible consequences of those decisions on children."

    Hansen's review encompassed nine studies, virtually all of the documentation available on the subject for her selected class of children.


    http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=100593
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,852
    Hey, maybe there is a 'gay gene' after all?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Quote Originally Posted by wilbur View Post
    Hey, maybe there is a 'gay gene' after all?
    Doubtful. A lot of these kids will be adopted. In any event, if a 'gay gene' was found, you can bet that the vast majority of pro-choice heterosexual women would elect to "try again".
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Power CUer FlaGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Swamps of N. Florida
    Posts
    22,172
    Quote Originally Posted by wilbur View Post
    Hey, maybe there is a 'gay gene' after all?
    More likely a gay Gene.

    I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.
    C. S. Lewis
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    41,073
    I wonder if they pick it up from what they see going on around them. You think?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    LTC Member Odysseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    FT Belvoir, VA
    Posts
    15,639
    Quote Originally Posted by megimoo View Post
    Eight percent of adult children reared by lesbians "had a homosexual relationship even though they weren't sexually attracted to same-sex partners," Hansen wrote
    Clearly, the operative term is "reared." :D
    --Odysseus
    Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.

    Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    41,073
    Quote Originally Posted by Odysseus View Post
    Clearly, the operative term is "reared." :D
    I wonder how old they are when they "send um packin".
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by wilbur View Post
    Hey, maybe there is a 'gay gene' after all?
    If there is - will the left finally find a reason to oppose abortions?
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    LTC Member Odysseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    FT Belvoir, VA
    Posts
    15,639
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockntractor View Post
    I wonder how old they are when they "send um packin".
    Depends on the age of consent?
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    If there is - will the left finally find a reason to oppose abortions?
    Liberal moral dilemma: If there is a gay gene, and it is detectable in-utero, is it acceptable to abort a fetus because it will grow up to be gay? The funny thing is, the religious pro-lifers will say no, unequivocably, while liberal gays will berate the mother for homophobia while feminists will stand by abortion on demand at all times, under all circumstances. Meanwhile, if gay activists attempt to make the case that aborting a baby for being gay is like aborting a baby for being black, the whole civil rights argument will collapse. I can't wait to hear Wilbur's response to this one.
    --Odysseus
    Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.

    Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Super Moderator BadCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In your dreams
    Posts
    15,600
    Quote Originally Posted by Odysseus View Post
    Depends on the age of consent?

    Liberal moral dilemma: If there is a gay gene, and it is detectable in-utero, is it acceptable to abort a fetus because it will grow up to be gay? The funny thing is, the religious pro-lifers will say no, unequivocably, while liberal gays will berate the mother for homophobia while feminists will stand by abortion on demand at all times, under all circumstances. Meanwhile, if gay activists attempt to make the case that aborting a baby for being gay is like aborting a baby for being black, the whole civil rights argument will collapse. I can't wait to hear Wilbur's response to this one.
    I've pointed this out before.

    I'm really hoping that it IS genetic, so this scenario will come to pass. It will cut down on the number of fags considerably.

    rm -rf obama*
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •