Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1 Obama Proposes PAYGO Law 
    Moderate Commie Lib
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    277
    http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/09/obama.paygo/

    Sort of a fluff weight article, but useful as a conversation starter.

    <snip>Any extra cost that lacks payment authorized by Congress would require the president to find money within the budget to pay it, while any tax cut would require a corresponding increase in tax revenue.

    Some costs would be exempt, including Medicare payments to doctors, the estate and gift tax, and tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2002, the White House statement said.[end of article]
    Kinda like shutting the barn doors after the herd (TARP, budget) got out, but hey, never too late to start, right?
    You determine how the conversation goes. Keep it clean, and you'll get nothing but honest discussion. Start flaming, and it's party time. :D
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    42,123
    He still doesn't realize that lowering taxes can bring in more revinue.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,970
    What this means is that Obama and the Democrats will use smoke and mirrors for their spending but that same method can not be used for tax cuts. For example, the health care plan will use projected saving which may or not be accurate but extrapolation of tax cuts is a no go. Obama and the Democraps are clever.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Does the article tell which items would not be included in paygo? You know like - entitlements - bailouts - those sorts of things . . . .This is nothing more than a way for them to justify raising taxes.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Moderate Commie Lib
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    277
    States that it will affect all spending going forward, but not specific items mentioned and also no retroactive balancing. Like I said, closing the barn doors after the herd got out.
    You determine how the conversation goes. Keep it clean, and you'll get nothing but honest discussion. Start flaming, and it's party time. :D
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,970
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    . . . .This is nothing more than a way for them to justify raising taxes.
    True, doubling the Fed gasoline tax is next. These monkeys in DC would like to add a buck or two onto the 18.4 cents per gal tax. Gotta pay for all that green energy.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by lacarnut View Post
    True, doubling the Fed gasoline tax is next. These monkeys in DC would like to add a buck or two onto the 18.4 cents per gal tax. Gotta pay for all that green energy.
    Of course! Because it's too stupid and backwards and inefficient to pay for itself. FUNNY THING that Barry says that these terrorist supporting nations have the right to nuclear power - and yet - we don't.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •